Evaluating the Shear Bond Strength of Repaired Composites Using Different Surface Treatments and Repair Materials: An In-Vitro Comparative Study

Introduction: Composite resin is commonly used in dental restorations, though it is prone to degradation over time. Repairing these restorations is often preferable for issues such as discoloration, small areas of decay near the restoration margin, or for preserving tooth health without the need for...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Prinaxy Byxyx, Ajay Kumar Nagpal, Prashasti Pandey, Darshan Das, Mihir Anand, Anupama Pradhan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2024-12-01
Series:Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_956_24
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841543519560269824
author Prinaxy Byxyx
Ajay Kumar Nagpal
Prashasti Pandey
Darshan Das
Mihir Anand
Anupama Pradhan
author_facet Prinaxy Byxyx
Ajay Kumar Nagpal
Prashasti Pandey
Darshan Das
Mihir Anand
Anupama Pradhan
author_sort Prinaxy Byxyx
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Composite resin is commonly used in dental restorations, though it is prone to degradation over time. Repairing these restorations is often preferable for issues such as discoloration, small areas of decay near the restoration margin, or for preserving tooth health without the need for complete removal. Method: Sixty acrylic blocks with cavities were restored using FILTEK-Z-250 XT composite resin, which was then light-cured. After 300 thermal cycles, the blocks were divided into three groups: control, diamond bur-abraded, and aluminum oxide air-abraded. Each group was further subdivided into two subgroups, treated with either Ivoclar Tetric N-bond or 3M ESPE Single Bond Universal adhesive. Shear bond strengths (SBSs) were tested after applying additional composite, and the types of fractures were analyzed. Results: The air-abrasion group (Group III) exhibited the highest SBS values compared to the other groups. Specifically, Group IIIb (air-abrasion combined with 3M ESPE Single Bond Universal adhesive) recorded the highest SBS values overall and within its subgroup. Conclusion: Treating the composite material’s surface with mechanical methods, especially air-abrasion, improves its repairability.
format Article
id doaj-art-1fdb38272700486ca7d09513a41627b7
institution Kabale University
issn 0976-4879
0975-7406
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
spelling doaj-art-1fdb38272700486ca7d09513a41627b72025-01-13T09:50:58ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences0976-48790975-74062024-12-0116Suppl 4S3443S344510.4103/jpbs.jpbs_956_24Evaluating the Shear Bond Strength of Repaired Composites Using Different Surface Treatments and Repair Materials: An In-Vitro Comparative StudyPrinaxy ByxyxAjay Kumar NagpalPrashasti PandeyDarshan DasMihir AnandAnupama PradhanIntroduction: Composite resin is commonly used in dental restorations, though it is prone to degradation over time. Repairing these restorations is often preferable for issues such as discoloration, small areas of decay near the restoration margin, or for preserving tooth health without the need for complete removal. Method: Sixty acrylic blocks with cavities were restored using FILTEK-Z-250 XT composite resin, which was then light-cured. After 300 thermal cycles, the blocks were divided into three groups: control, diamond bur-abraded, and aluminum oxide air-abraded. Each group was further subdivided into two subgroups, treated with either Ivoclar Tetric N-bond or 3M ESPE Single Bond Universal adhesive. Shear bond strengths (SBSs) were tested after applying additional composite, and the types of fractures were analyzed. Results: The air-abrasion group (Group III) exhibited the highest SBS values compared to the other groups. Specifically, Group IIIb (air-abrasion combined with 3M ESPE Single Bond Universal adhesive) recorded the highest SBS values overall and within its subgroup. Conclusion: Treating the composite material’s surface with mechanical methods, especially air-abrasion, improves its repairability.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_956_243m espe single bond universal adhesivealuminum oxide air-abrasioncomposite resindental restorationsdiamond bur abrasionfracture analysisivoclar tetric n-bondshear bond strengthsurface treatmentthermal cycling
spellingShingle Prinaxy Byxyx
Ajay Kumar Nagpal
Prashasti Pandey
Darshan Das
Mihir Anand
Anupama Pradhan
Evaluating the Shear Bond Strength of Repaired Composites Using Different Surface Treatments and Repair Materials: An In-Vitro Comparative Study
Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
3m espe single bond universal adhesive
aluminum oxide air-abrasion
composite resin
dental restorations
diamond bur abrasion
fracture analysis
ivoclar tetric n-bond
shear bond strength
surface treatment
thermal cycling
title Evaluating the Shear Bond Strength of Repaired Composites Using Different Surface Treatments and Repair Materials: An In-Vitro Comparative Study
title_full Evaluating the Shear Bond Strength of Repaired Composites Using Different Surface Treatments and Repair Materials: An In-Vitro Comparative Study
title_fullStr Evaluating the Shear Bond Strength of Repaired Composites Using Different Surface Treatments and Repair Materials: An In-Vitro Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the Shear Bond Strength of Repaired Composites Using Different Surface Treatments and Repair Materials: An In-Vitro Comparative Study
title_short Evaluating the Shear Bond Strength of Repaired Composites Using Different Surface Treatments and Repair Materials: An In-Vitro Comparative Study
title_sort evaluating the shear bond strength of repaired composites using different surface treatments and repair materials an in vitro comparative study
topic 3m espe single bond universal adhesive
aluminum oxide air-abrasion
composite resin
dental restorations
diamond bur abrasion
fracture analysis
ivoclar tetric n-bond
shear bond strength
surface treatment
thermal cycling
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_956_24
work_keys_str_mv AT prinaxybyxyx evaluatingtheshearbondstrengthofrepairedcompositesusingdifferentsurfacetreatmentsandrepairmaterialsaninvitrocomparativestudy
AT ajaykumarnagpal evaluatingtheshearbondstrengthofrepairedcompositesusingdifferentsurfacetreatmentsandrepairmaterialsaninvitrocomparativestudy
AT prashastipandey evaluatingtheshearbondstrengthofrepairedcompositesusingdifferentsurfacetreatmentsandrepairmaterialsaninvitrocomparativestudy
AT darshandas evaluatingtheshearbondstrengthofrepairedcompositesusingdifferentsurfacetreatmentsandrepairmaterialsaninvitrocomparativestudy
AT mihiranand evaluatingtheshearbondstrengthofrepairedcompositesusingdifferentsurfacetreatmentsandrepairmaterialsaninvitrocomparativestudy
AT anupamapradhan evaluatingtheshearbondstrengthofrepairedcompositesusingdifferentsurfacetreatmentsandrepairmaterialsaninvitrocomparativestudy