Paracetamol did not improve the analgesic efficacy with regional block after video assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract Background Various analgesic techniques have been applied, the pain after video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) is still challenging for anesthesiologists. Paracetamol provide analgesic efficacy in many surgeries. However, clinical evidence in the lung surgery with regional block remain li...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sujin Kim, Seung Woo Song, Haesung Lee, Chun Sung Byun, Ji-Hyoung Park
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-01-01
Series:BMC Anesthesiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-02888-4
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841544338945867776
author Sujin Kim
Seung Woo Song
Haesung Lee
Chun Sung Byun
Ji-Hyoung Park
author_facet Sujin Kim
Seung Woo Song
Haesung Lee
Chun Sung Byun
Ji-Hyoung Park
author_sort Sujin Kim
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Various analgesic techniques have been applied, the pain after video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) is still challenging for anesthesiologists. Paracetamol provide analgesic efficacy in many surgeries. However, clinical evidence in the lung surgery with regional block remain limited. This monocentric double-blind randomized controlled trial investigates the efficacy of paracetamol after VATS with regional block. Methods A total of 90 patients were randomized to receive paracetamol (1 g) or normal saline. Erector Spinae Plane Block and Intercostal Nerve block were applied during the surgery. The Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) pain score was measured in the PACU as well as 6, 12, 24, and 48 h postoperatively. And the total dose of rescue analgesics administered to patients in morphine milligram equivalents (MME), satisfaction score, length of hospital stays, and incidence of nausea and vomiting were also recorded. Results The VAS pain score at each time point, the primary endpoint, did not differ between the groups (3.09 ± 2.14 vs. 2.53 ± 1.67, p = 0.174 at PACU; 4.56 ± 2.80 vs. 4.06 ± 2.46, p = 0.368 at 6 h; 3.07 ± 1.98 vs. 3.44 ± 2.48, p = 0.427 at 12 h; 2.10 ± 2.00 vs. 2.49 ± 2.07, p = 0.368 at 24 h; and 1.93 ± 1.76 vs. 2.39 ± 1.97, p = 0.251 at 48 h postoperatively). Satisfaction scores (4.37 ± 0.76 vs. 4.14 ± 0.88, p = 0.201), nausea (35.6% vs. 37.8%, p = 0.827), hypotension (2.2% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.317), and bradycardia (6.7% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.309) were also reported at similar rates. Conclusions The analgesic efficacy of one gram of paracetamol with ESPB and ICNB after VATS was not proven. Thus, caution should be exercised when prescribing paracetamol for pain control during VATS. Trial registration this trial was registered on Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS), Republic of Korea (KCT0008710). Registration date: 17/08/2023.
format Article
id doaj-art-1e55b4a9a0274266ad6d6c0b30cda64f
institution Kabale University
issn 1471-2253
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Anesthesiology
spelling doaj-art-1e55b4a9a0274266ad6d6c0b30cda64f2025-01-12T12:37:00ZengBMCBMC Anesthesiology1471-22532025-01-012511710.1186/s12871-025-02888-4Paracetamol did not improve the analgesic efficacy with regional block after video assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trialSujin Kim0Seung Woo Song1Haesung Lee2Chun Sung Byun3Ji-Hyoung Park4Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei UniversityDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei UniversityDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei UniversityDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei UniversityDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei UniversityAbstract Background Various analgesic techniques have been applied, the pain after video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) is still challenging for anesthesiologists. Paracetamol provide analgesic efficacy in many surgeries. However, clinical evidence in the lung surgery with regional block remain limited. This monocentric double-blind randomized controlled trial investigates the efficacy of paracetamol after VATS with regional block. Methods A total of 90 patients were randomized to receive paracetamol (1 g) or normal saline. Erector Spinae Plane Block and Intercostal Nerve block were applied during the surgery. The Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) pain score was measured in the PACU as well as 6, 12, 24, and 48 h postoperatively. And the total dose of rescue analgesics administered to patients in morphine milligram equivalents (MME), satisfaction score, length of hospital stays, and incidence of nausea and vomiting were also recorded. Results The VAS pain score at each time point, the primary endpoint, did not differ between the groups (3.09 ± 2.14 vs. 2.53 ± 1.67, p = 0.174 at PACU; 4.56 ± 2.80 vs. 4.06 ± 2.46, p = 0.368 at 6 h; 3.07 ± 1.98 vs. 3.44 ± 2.48, p = 0.427 at 12 h; 2.10 ± 2.00 vs. 2.49 ± 2.07, p = 0.368 at 24 h; and 1.93 ± 1.76 vs. 2.39 ± 1.97, p = 0.251 at 48 h postoperatively). Satisfaction scores (4.37 ± 0.76 vs. 4.14 ± 0.88, p = 0.201), nausea (35.6% vs. 37.8%, p = 0.827), hypotension (2.2% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.317), and bradycardia (6.7% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.309) were also reported at similar rates. Conclusions The analgesic efficacy of one gram of paracetamol with ESPB and ICNB after VATS was not proven. Thus, caution should be exercised when prescribing paracetamol for pain control during VATS. Trial registration this trial was registered on Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS), Republic of Korea (KCT0008710). Registration date: 17/08/2023.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-02888-4ParacetamolVideo assisted thoracic surgeryErector spinae plane blockIntercostal nerve blockAnalgesic efficacyVisual analogue scales
spellingShingle Sujin Kim
Seung Woo Song
Haesung Lee
Chun Sung Byun
Ji-Hyoung Park
Paracetamol did not improve the analgesic efficacy with regional block after video assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial
BMC Anesthesiology
Paracetamol
Video assisted thoracic surgery
Erector spinae plane block
Intercostal nerve block
Analgesic efficacy
Visual analogue scales
title Paracetamol did not improve the analgesic efficacy with regional block after video assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Paracetamol did not improve the analgesic efficacy with regional block after video assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Paracetamol did not improve the analgesic efficacy with regional block after video assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Paracetamol did not improve the analgesic efficacy with regional block after video assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Paracetamol did not improve the analgesic efficacy with regional block after video assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort paracetamol did not improve the analgesic efficacy with regional block after video assisted thoracoscopic surgery a randomized controlled trial
topic Paracetamol
Video assisted thoracic surgery
Erector spinae plane block
Intercostal nerve block
Analgesic efficacy
Visual analogue scales
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-02888-4
work_keys_str_mv AT sujinkim paracetamoldidnotimprovetheanalgesicefficacywithregionalblockaftervideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT seungwoosong paracetamoldidnotimprovetheanalgesicefficacywithregionalblockaftervideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT haesunglee paracetamoldidnotimprovetheanalgesicefficacywithregionalblockaftervideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chunsungbyun paracetamoldidnotimprovetheanalgesicefficacywithregionalblockaftervideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jihyoungpark paracetamoldidnotimprovetheanalgesicefficacywithregionalblockaftervideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial