On the Question of the Imperative or Dispositivity of the Norm of Paragraph 1 of Article 782 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, Which Establishes the Right of the Customer to Unmotivated Refusal of the Contract for the Provision of Paid Services
In this article, the author explores the question of the qualification of Paragraph 1 of Article 782 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, which gives the right to unmotivated refuse to perform a contract for the provision of paid services. The paper considers various approaches to the issue...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
North-West Institute of Management, Branch of Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA)
2022-07-01
|
| Series: | Теоретическая и прикладная юриспруденция |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.taljournal.ru/jour/article/view/184 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841536705390182400 |
|---|---|
| author | S. V. Markin |
| author_facet | S. V. Markin |
| author_sort | S. V. Markin |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In this article, the author explores the question of the qualification of Paragraph 1 of Article 782 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, which gives the right to unmotivated refuse to perform a contract for the provision of paid services. The paper considers various approaches to the issue of dispositivity or imperativeness of this norm. The positions of scientists on the legal nature of 782 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation are considered. The author analyzes judicial practice for the possibility of blocking the right to unilateral refusal. Based on the presented analysis, conclusions are drawn about the dispositivity of 782 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation regarding the inadmissibility of blocking the right to unilateral refusal itself, at the same time, the parties are allowed to establish a different procedure for the implementation of this right. A possible option for improving domestic legislation regulating the termination of a contract for the provision of paid services is also proposed. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-1d68bce21f1b4ff9b150645cdf686504 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 3034-2813 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2022-07-01 |
| publisher | North-West Institute of Management, Branch of Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Теоретическая и прикладная юриспруденция |
| spelling | doaj-art-1d68bce21f1b4ff9b150645cdf6865042025-01-14T11:56:23ZengNorth-West Institute of Management, Branch of Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA)Теоретическая и прикладная юриспруденция3034-28132022-07-0102788310.22394/2686-7834-2022-2-78-83128On the Question of the Imperative or Dispositivity of the Norm of Paragraph 1 of Article 782 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, Which Establishes the Right of the Customer to Unmotivated Refusal of the Contract for the Provision of Paid ServicesS. V. Markin0North-West Institute of Management of the Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian FederationIn this article, the author explores the question of the qualification of Paragraph 1 of Article 782 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, which gives the right to unmotivated refuse to perform a contract for the provision of paid services. The paper considers various approaches to the issue of dispositivity or imperativeness of this norm. The positions of scientists on the legal nature of 782 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation are considered. The author analyzes judicial practice for the possibility of blocking the right to unilateral refusal. Based on the presented analysis, conclusions are drawn about the dispositivity of 782 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation regarding the inadmissibility of blocking the right to unilateral refusal itself, at the same time, the parties are allowed to establish a different procedure for the implementation of this right. A possible option for improving domestic legislation regulating the termination of a contract for the provision of paid services is also proposed.https://www.taljournal.ru/jour/article/view/184freedom of contractdispositivitypermissive method of legal regulationimperativenesscontract for the provision of paid servicesthe take or pay modelunmotivated refusal to perform the contractpayment for the refusal of the contract |
| spellingShingle | S. V. Markin On the Question of the Imperative or Dispositivity of the Norm of Paragraph 1 of Article 782 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, Which Establishes the Right of the Customer to Unmotivated Refusal of the Contract for the Provision of Paid Services Теоретическая и прикладная юриспруденция freedom of contract dispositivity permissive method of legal regulation imperativeness contract for the provision of paid services the take or pay model unmotivated refusal to perform the contract payment for the refusal of the contract |
| title | On the Question of the Imperative or Dispositivity of the Norm of Paragraph 1 of Article 782 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, Which Establishes the Right of the Customer to Unmotivated Refusal of the Contract for the Provision of Paid Services |
| title_full | On the Question of the Imperative or Dispositivity of the Norm of Paragraph 1 of Article 782 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, Which Establishes the Right of the Customer to Unmotivated Refusal of the Contract for the Provision of Paid Services |
| title_fullStr | On the Question of the Imperative or Dispositivity of the Norm of Paragraph 1 of Article 782 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, Which Establishes the Right of the Customer to Unmotivated Refusal of the Contract for the Provision of Paid Services |
| title_full_unstemmed | On the Question of the Imperative or Dispositivity of the Norm of Paragraph 1 of Article 782 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, Which Establishes the Right of the Customer to Unmotivated Refusal of the Contract for the Provision of Paid Services |
| title_short | On the Question of the Imperative or Dispositivity of the Norm of Paragraph 1 of Article 782 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, Which Establishes the Right of the Customer to Unmotivated Refusal of the Contract for the Provision of Paid Services |
| title_sort | on the question of the imperative or dispositivity of the norm of paragraph 1 of article 782 of the civil code of the russian federation which establishes the right of the customer to unmotivated refusal of the contract for the provision of paid services |
| topic | freedom of contract dispositivity permissive method of legal regulation imperativeness contract for the provision of paid services the take or pay model unmotivated refusal to perform the contract payment for the refusal of the contract |
| url | https://www.taljournal.ru/jour/article/view/184 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT svmarkin onthequestionoftheimperativeordispositivityofthenormofparagraph1ofarticle782ofthecivilcodeoftherussianfederationwhichestablishestherightofthecustomertounmotivatedrefusalofthecontractfortheprovisionofpaidservices |