Influence of implant length on implant primary and secondary stability
Introduction: Implant stability can be measured at the moment of implant placement or once the osseointegration process is in progress. Many factors should be considered, including bone quality, osteotomy preparation, implant design, implant surface enhancement, and implant length and diameter. Obj...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
ECIMED
2022-04-01
|
| Series: | Revista Cubana de Medicina Militar |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://revmedmilitar.sld.cu/index.php/mil/article/view/1917 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841546333699178496 |
|---|---|
| author | Mauricio Toro Javiera Leitao Tomás Yoma Alain Manuel Chaple Gil Eduardo Fernández |
| author_facet | Mauricio Toro Javiera Leitao Tomás Yoma Alain Manuel Chaple Gil Eduardo Fernández |
| author_sort | Mauricio Toro |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
Introduction: Implant stability can be measured at the moment of implant placement or once the osseointegration process is in progress. Many factors should be considered, including bone quality, osteotomy preparation, implant design, implant surface enhancement, and implant length and diameter.
Objective: Determine the influence of implant length on primary and secondary stability in type II and type III bones using resonance frequency analysis method.
Methods: A prospective study was conducted in the department of Oral maxillofacial Implantology at the School of Dentistry of the University of Chile between April 2006 and June 2007. 38 screw type implants were placed in the maxilla and mandible, in type II and type III bones. 21 implants had an average contact area of 237 mm2 including 2 sizes (3.75mm and a length of 13mm and 15mm) and 17 implants had an average contact area of 129 mm 2 (diameter of 3.75mm and a length of 7mm). Implant primary stability was measured by the Implant Stability Quotient value. Resonance frequency measurements were recorded using Osstell™ Mentor. Secondary implant stability was recorded between 4 to 6 months after the implant placement.
Results: For implants with an average contact area of 237 mm2 the stability 1 average value was 71,37 and the stability 2 average value was 66,6. For implants with an average contact area of 129 mm2 the stability 1 average value was 67,47 and the stability 2 average value was 68,08.
Conclusion: Implant length does not influence primary and secondary stability in type II and type III bones.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-1ceebacdd5e74202b42268a4f473f873 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1561-3046 |
| language | Spanish |
| publishDate | 2022-04-01 |
| publisher | ECIMED |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Revista Cubana de Medicina Militar |
| spelling | doaj-art-1ceebacdd5e74202b42268a4f473f8732025-01-10T19:05:11ZspaECIMEDRevista Cubana de Medicina Militar1561-30462022-04-01512Influence of implant length on implant primary and secondary stabilityMauricio Toro0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5333-3640Javiera Leitao1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8791-239XTomás Yoma2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4617-0040Alain Manuel Chaple Gil3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8571-4429Eduardo Fernández4https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2616-1510Departamento de Prótesis, Facultad de OdontologÃa, Universidad de Chile. Santiago, Chile.Departamento de Prótesis, Facultad de OdontologÃa, Universidad de Chile. Santiago, Chile.Departamento de Prótesis, Facultad de OdontologÃa, Universidad de Chile. Santiago, Chile.Universidad Ciencias Médicas de La Habana. Facultad de Ciencias Médicas “Victoria de Girónâ€. Departamento Carrera de EstomatologÃa. La Habana, Cuba. Universidad Autónoma de Chile. Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud. Temuco, Chile.Universidad de Chile. Facultad de OdontologÃa. Departamento de OdontologÃa Restauradora. Santiago de Chile, Chile. Universidad Autónoma de Chile. Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas. Santiago de Chile, Chile. Introduction: Implant stability can be measured at the moment of implant placement or once the osseointegration process is in progress. Many factors should be considered, including bone quality, osteotomy preparation, implant design, implant surface enhancement, and implant length and diameter. Objective: Determine the influence of implant length on primary and secondary stability in type II and type III bones using resonance frequency analysis method. Methods: A prospective study was conducted in the department of Oral maxillofacial Implantology at the School of Dentistry of the University of Chile between April 2006 and June 2007. 38 screw type implants were placed in the maxilla and mandible, in type II and type III bones. 21 implants had an average contact area of 237 mm2 including 2 sizes (3.75mm and a length of 13mm and 15mm) and 17 implants had an average contact area of 129 mm 2 (diameter of 3.75mm and a length of 7mm). Implant primary stability was measured by the Implant Stability Quotient value. Resonance frequency measurements were recorded using Osstell™ Mentor. Secondary implant stability was recorded between 4 to 6 months after the implant placement. Results: For implants with an average contact area of 237 mm2 the stability 1 average value was 71,37 and the stability 2 average value was 66,6. For implants with an average contact area of 129 mm2 the stability 1 average value was 67,47 and the stability 2 average value was 68,08. Conclusion: Implant length does not influence primary and secondary stability in type II and type III bones. https://revmedmilitar.sld.cu/index.php/mil/article/view/1917ental implantsprimary stabilityimplant length. |
| spellingShingle | Mauricio Toro Javiera Leitao Tomás Yoma Alain Manuel Chaple Gil Eduardo Fernández Influence of implant length on implant primary and secondary stability Revista Cubana de Medicina Militar ental implants primary stability implant length. |
| title | Influence of implant length on implant primary and secondary stability |
| title_full | Influence of implant length on implant primary and secondary stability |
| title_fullStr | Influence of implant length on implant primary and secondary stability |
| title_full_unstemmed | Influence of implant length on implant primary and secondary stability |
| title_short | Influence of implant length on implant primary and secondary stability |
| title_sort | influence of implant length on implant primary and secondary stability |
| topic | ental implants primary stability implant length. |
| url | https://revmedmilitar.sld.cu/index.php/mil/article/view/1917 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mauriciotoro influenceofimplantlengthonimplantprimaryandsecondarystability AT javieraleitao influenceofimplantlengthonimplantprimaryandsecondarystability AT tomasyoma influenceofimplantlengthonimplantprimaryandsecondarystability AT alainmanuelchaplegil influenceofimplantlengthonimplantprimaryandsecondarystability AT eduardofernandez influenceofimplantlengthonimplantprimaryandsecondarystability |