Effect of blindfolding the lead resuscitator on frequency of closed-loop communication during veterinary cardio-pulmonary resuscitation training: a randomized, controlled pilot study
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of blindfolding the lead resuscitator during veterinary cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) simulation training sessions on frequency of completed closed-loop communication statements (CLC).DesignTen groups of staff volunteers were recruited for a prospective, randomi...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2025-01-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Veterinary Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2024.1484506/full |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1841555063170924544 |
---|---|
author | Olivia X. Walesby Giacomo Stanzani Lindsay Kellett-Gregory Mayank Seth Emily K. Thomas |
author_facet | Olivia X. Walesby Giacomo Stanzani Lindsay Kellett-Gregory Mayank Seth Emily K. Thomas |
author_sort | Olivia X. Walesby |
collection | DOAJ |
description | ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of blindfolding the lead resuscitator during veterinary cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) simulation training sessions on frequency of completed closed-loop communication statements (CLC).DesignTen groups of staff volunteers were recruited for a prospective, randomized, blinded, observational pilot study over a 6-month period. Additionally, two associated online questionnaires were completed by participants.SettingPrivate veterinary referral hospital in the United Kingdom.InterventionForty volunteers were randomly allocated into ten groups of four. Each group was randomized as either control (CG) or blindfolded (BG) with the lead resuscitator always a veterinarian. The intervention involved the lead resuscitator wearing a blindfold during the third of four CPR simulation scenarios for the BG groups only.Measurements and main resultsVideo footage of Scenarios 2 (before) and 4 (after) the intervention was reviewed to quantify complete CLCs. Quantitative data were analyzed, and descriptive statistics calculated using GraphPadPrism (GraphPadPrism, Version9.3.1(350) forMacOSX, GraphPadSoftware, SanDiego, CA). Information from questionnaire responses was also analyzed. Statistical differences between the BGs and CGs were analyzed and there was no statistical difference in frequency of CLCs between the BGs and CGs during Scenario 2 (p = 0.76). In Scenario 4, however, following the intervention, there was a significant difference between BGs and CGs (p = 0.03), with a greater number of CLCs for the BGs compared with the CGs.ConclusionBlindfolding the lead resuscitator in veterinary CPR training scenarios may be an effective method to increase the incidence of complete CLCs. Further studies would be required to investigate whether this finding is replicated and retained in the longer term. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-1c9d6b133f374e1a9524b95f23dd8bf5 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2297-1769 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | Article |
series | Frontiers in Veterinary Science |
spelling | doaj-art-1c9d6b133f374e1a9524b95f23dd8bf52025-01-08T06:11:51ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Veterinary Science2297-17692025-01-011110.3389/fvets.2024.14845061484506Effect of blindfolding the lead resuscitator on frequency of closed-loop communication during veterinary cardio-pulmonary resuscitation training: a randomized, controlled pilot studyOlivia X. Walesby0Giacomo Stanzani1Lindsay Kellett-Gregory2Mayank Seth3Emily K. Thomas4The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies and the Roslin Institute, Easter Bush Campus, The University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, United KingdomDick White Referrals, part of Linnaeus Veterinary Limited, Cambridgeshire, United KingdomDick White Referrals, part of Linnaeus Veterinary Limited, Cambridgeshire, United KingdomStansted Veterinary Services, Unit 7, Stansted Courtyard, Bishop's Stortford, United KingdomDick White Referrals, part of Linnaeus Veterinary Limited, Cambridgeshire, United KingdomObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of blindfolding the lead resuscitator during veterinary cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) simulation training sessions on frequency of completed closed-loop communication statements (CLC).DesignTen groups of staff volunteers were recruited for a prospective, randomized, blinded, observational pilot study over a 6-month period. Additionally, two associated online questionnaires were completed by participants.SettingPrivate veterinary referral hospital in the United Kingdom.InterventionForty volunteers were randomly allocated into ten groups of four. Each group was randomized as either control (CG) or blindfolded (BG) with the lead resuscitator always a veterinarian. The intervention involved the lead resuscitator wearing a blindfold during the third of four CPR simulation scenarios for the BG groups only.Measurements and main resultsVideo footage of Scenarios 2 (before) and 4 (after) the intervention was reviewed to quantify complete CLCs. Quantitative data were analyzed, and descriptive statistics calculated using GraphPadPrism (GraphPadPrism, Version9.3.1(350) forMacOSX, GraphPadSoftware, SanDiego, CA). Information from questionnaire responses was also analyzed. Statistical differences between the BGs and CGs were analyzed and there was no statistical difference in frequency of CLCs between the BGs and CGs during Scenario 2 (p = 0.76). In Scenario 4, however, following the intervention, there was a significant difference between BGs and CGs (p = 0.03), with a greater number of CLCs for the BGs compared with the CGs.ConclusionBlindfolding the lead resuscitator in veterinary CPR training scenarios may be an effective method to increase the incidence of complete CLCs. Further studies would be required to investigate whether this finding is replicated and retained in the longer term.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2024.1484506/fullclosed-loop communicationCPR (veterinary)CPR training (veterinary)veterinary CPR scenariosveterinary communication skills |
spellingShingle | Olivia X. Walesby Giacomo Stanzani Lindsay Kellett-Gregory Mayank Seth Emily K. Thomas Effect of blindfolding the lead resuscitator on frequency of closed-loop communication during veterinary cardio-pulmonary resuscitation training: a randomized, controlled pilot study Frontiers in Veterinary Science closed-loop communication CPR (veterinary) CPR training (veterinary) veterinary CPR scenarios veterinary communication skills |
title | Effect of blindfolding the lead resuscitator on frequency of closed-loop communication during veterinary cardio-pulmonary resuscitation training: a randomized, controlled pilot study |
title_full | Effect of blindfolding the lead resuscitator on frequency of closed-loop communication during veterinary cardio-pulmonary resuscitation training: a randomized, controlled pilot study |
title_fullStr | Effect of blindfolding the lead resuscitator on frequency of closed-loop communication during veterinary cardio-pulmonary resuscitation training: a randomized, controlled pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of blindfolding the lead resuscitator on frequency of closed-loop communication during veterinary cardio-pulmonary resuscitation training: a randomized, controlled pilot study |
title_short | Effect of blindfolding the lead resuscitator on frequency of closed-loop communication during veterinary cardio-pulmonary resuscitation training: a randomized, controlled pilot study |
title_sort | effect of blindfolding the lead resuscitator on frequency of closed loop communication during veterinary cardio pulmonary resuscitation training a randomized controlled pilot study |
topic | closed-loop communication CPR (veterinary) CPR training (veterinary) veterinary CPR scenarios veterinary communication skills |
url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2024.1484506/full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oliviaxwalesby effectofblindfoldingtheleadresuscitatoronfrequencyofclosedloopcommunicationduringveterinarycardiopulmonaryresuscitationtrainingarandomizedcontrolledpilotstudy AT giacomostanzani effectofblindfoldingtheleadresuscitatoronfrequencyofclosedloopcommunicationduringveterinarycardiopulmonaryresuscitationtrainingarandomizedcontrolledpilotstudy AT lindsaykellettgregory effectofblindfoldingtheleadresuscitatoronfrequencyofclosedloopcommunicationduringveterinarycardiopulmonaryresuscitationtrainingarandomizedcontrolledpilotstudy AT mayankseth effectofblindfoldingtheleadresuscitatoronfrequencyofclosedloopcommunicationduringveterinarycardiopulmonaryresuscitationtrainingarandomizedcontrolledpilotstudy AT emilykthomas effectofblindfoldingtheleadresuscitatoronfrequencyofclosedloopcommunicationduringveterinarycardiopulmonaryresuscitationtrainingarandomizedcontrolledpilotstudy |