Computing the social costs of carbon through Coase bargaining in the context of an offsetting program in the Venetian lagoon

Abstract The paper adds to the narrow literature on saltmarsh carbon storage. It aims at proposing and testing an original climate policy measure that encompasses other policies limitations, under specific conditions. In particular, the study aims at adopting nonmarket valuation methods (e.g., conti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laura Onofri, Anil Markandya
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer Nature 2024-12-01
Series:Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03870-0
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846137181815439360
author Laura Onofri
Anil Markandya
author_facet Laura Onofri
Anil Markandya
author_sort Laura Onofri
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The paper adds to the narrow literature on saltmarsh carbon storage. It aims at proposing and testing an original climate policy measure that encompasses other policies limitations, under specific conditions. In particular, the study aims at adopting nonmarket valuation methods (e.g., contingent valuation) for assessing the willingness to pay (WTP) of local CO2 polluters to carbon offsetting by refurbishing local stock of natural capital that absorbs CO2. We apply the framework to the Venice Lagoon ecosystem and the Murano artistic glass sector. Murano artistic glass producers are confronted with the choice to internalize CO2 emissions externalities through the reconstruction and conservation of Venetian barene, local saltmarshes that are very productive in carbon sequestration and stocking. Results show that local polluters present a very high WTP to contribute for the natural capital that stocks and absorb the CO2. However, only a small portion of polluters is willing to pay for the public good, even if the stated value exceeds literature and policy estimates of the social costs of carbon. Results suggest that WTP for a global public good could account for a significant part of the social costs of carbon (and could even exceed it) even though it represents only a few people’s WTP. The key is the context in which the payment is made. The experiment and results can support very local policies for carbon offsetting and climate change mitigation based on local Coasian bargaining.
format Article
id doaj-art-1b0fef98cc8148568dd448c31354fed1
institution Kabale University
issn 2662-9992
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Springer Nature
record_format Article
series Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
spelling doaj-art-1b0fef98cc8148568dd448c31354fed12024-12-08T12:22:09ZengSpringer NatureHumanities & Social Sciences Communications2662-99922024-12-011111910.1057/s41599-024-03870-0Computing the social costs of carbon through Coase bargaining in the context of an offsetting program in the Venetian lagoonLaura Onofri0Anil Markandya1University IUAV of VeniceBasque Center of Climate Change (BC3), Scientific Campus of the University of the Basque CountryAbstract The paper adds to the narrow literature on saltmarsh carbon storage. It aims at proposing and testing an original climate policy measure that encompasses other policies limitations, under specific conditions. In particular, the study aims at adopting nonmarket valuation methods (e.g., contingent valuation) for assessing the willingness to pay (WTP) of local CO2 polluters to carbon offsetting by refurbishing local stock of natural capital that absorbs CO2. We apply the framework to the Venice Lagoon ecosystem and the Murano artistic glass sector. Murano artistic glass producers are confronted with the choice to internalize CO2 emissions externalities through the reconstruction and conservation of Venetian barene, local saltmarshes that are very productive in carbon sequestration and stocking. Results show that local polluters present a very high WTP to contribute for the natural capital that stocks and absorb the CO2. However, only a small portion of polluters is willing to pay for the public good, even if the stated value exceeds literature and policy estimates of the social costs of carbon. Results suggest that WTP for a global public good could account for a significant part of the social costs of carbon (and could even exceed it) even though it represents only a few people’s WTP. The key is the context in which the payment is made. The experiment and results can support very local policies for carbon offsetting and climate change mitigation based on local Coasian bargaining.https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03870-0
spellingShingle Laura Onofri
Anil Markandya
Computing the social costs of carbon through Coase bargaining in the context of an offsetting program in the Venetian lagoon
Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
title Computing the social costs of carbon through Coase bargaining in the context of an offsetting program in the Venetian lagoon
title_full Computing the social costs of carbon through Coase bargaining in the context of an offsetting program in the Venetian lagoon
title_fullStr Computing the social costs of carbon through Coase bargaining in the context of an offsetting program in the Venetian lagoon
title_full_unstemmed Computing the social costs of carbon through Coase bargaining in the context of an offsetting program in the Venetian lagoon
title_short Computing the social costs of carbon through Coase bargaining in the context of an offsetting program in the Venetian lagoon
title_sort computing the social costs of carbon through coase bargaining in the context of an offsetting program in the venetian lagoon
url https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03870-0
work_keys_str_mv AT lauraonofri computingthesocialcostsofcarbonthroughcoasebargaininginthecontextofanoffsettingprograminthevenetianlagoon
AT anilmarkandya computingthesocialcostsofcarbonthroughcoasebargaininginthecontextofanoffsettingprograminthevenetianlagoon