Was the Lhasa Block at Low Latitudes in the Middle Permian? Insights From New Paleomagnetic and Geochronological Data
Abstract The absence of reliable paleomagnetic constraints from the Lhasa Block has led to alternative interpretations of its late Paleozoic position and timing of rifting from Gondwana, reflecting uncertainties in early Neo‐Tethyan paleogeography. This study presents paleomagnetic and geochronologi...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2025-04-01
|
| Series: | Geophysical Research Letters |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL114347 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Abstract The absence of reliable paleomagnetic constraints from the Lhasa Block has led to alternative interpretations of its late Paleozoic position and timing of rifting from Gondwana, reflecting uncertainties in early Neo‐Tethyan paleogeography. This study presents paleomagnetic and geochronological data from the middle Permian Luobadui Formation, providing a new paleogeographic constraint on the Lhasa Block. Despite possible remagnetization, the dual‐polarity magnetization, hosted in different minerals and lithologies, likely represents a middle Permian remanence. This constraint implies the Lhasa Block was located at 16.7 ± 5.3°S at 267.8 ± 5 Ma, following its rifting from Gondwana. New U‐Pb detrital zircon ages from sandstones further suggest the Lhasa Block was located along the northwestern margin of Australia prior to rifting. Integrating other geological evidence, we propose that the Bangong Co‐Nujiang and Yarlung‐Zangbo oceans, now preserved as sutures flanking the Lhasa Block, both opened before the middle Permian, potentially representing branches of the same nascent oceanic corridor (Neo‐Tethys). |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0094-8276 1944-8007 |