Public involvement and engagement in big data research: protocol for a scoping review and a systematic review of delivery and effectiveness of strategies for involvement and engagement
Introduction Big data research has grown considerably over the last two decades. This presents new ethical challenges around consent, data storage and anonymisation. Big data research projects require public support to succeed and it has been argued that one way to achieve this is through public inv...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021-08-01
|
| Series: | BMJ Open |
| Online Access: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/8/e050167.full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1846136589970833408 |
|---|---|
| author | Lucy Frith Naheed Tahir Saiqa Ahmed Piotr Teodorowski Elisa Jones |
| author_facet | Lucy Frith Naheed Tahir Saiqa Ahmed Piotr Teodorowski Elisa Jones |
| author_sort | Lucy Frith |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Introduction Big data research has grown considerably over the last two decades. This presents new ethical challenges around consent, data storage and anonymisation. Big data research projects require public support to succeed and it has been argued that one way to achieve this is through public involvement and engagement. To better understand the role public involvement and engagement can play in big data research, we will review the current literature. This protocol describes the planned review methods.Methods and analysis Our review will be conducted in two stages. In the first stage, we will conduct a scoping review using Arksey and O’Malley methodology to comprehensively map current evidence on public involvement and engagement in big data research. Databases (CINAHL, Health Research Premium Collection, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science) and grey literature will be searched for eligible papers. We provide a narrative description of the results based on a thematic analysis. In the second stage, out of papers found in the scoping review which discuss involvement and engagement strategies, we will conduct a systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, exploring the delivery and effectiveness of these strategies. We will conduct a qualitative synthesis. Relevant results from the quantitative studies will be extracted and placed under qualitative themes. Individual studies will be appraised through Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), we will then assess the overall confidence in each finding through Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research (GRADE-CERQual). Results will be reported in a thematic and narrative way.Ethics and dissemination This protocol sets out how the review will be conducted to ensure rigour and transparency. Public advisors were involved in its development. Ethics approval is not required. Review findings will be presented at conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-1b005652cff4420e8256a872bc24c05e |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2044-6055 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2021-08-01 |
| publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMJ Open |
| spelling | doaj-art-1b005652cff4420e8256a872bc24c05e2024-12-08T18:25:13ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552021-08-0111810.1136/bmjopen-2021-050167Public involvement and engagement in big data research: protocol for a scoping review and a systematic review of delivery and effectiveness of strategies for involvement and engagementLucy Frith0Naheed Tahir1Saiqa Ahmed2Piotr Teodorowski3Elisa Jones4Centre for Social Ethics & Policy, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UKARC NWC Public Advisor, Liverpool, UKARC NWC Public Advisor, Liverpool, UKInstitute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UKDepartment of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UKIntroduction Big data research has grown considerably over the last two decades. This presents new ethical challenges around consent, data storage and anonymisation. Big data research projects require public support to succeed and it has been argued that one way to achieve this is through public involvement and engagement. To better understand the role public involvement and engagement can play in big data research, we will review the current literature. This protocol describes the planned review methods.Methods and analysis Our review will be conducted in two stages. In the first stage, we will conduct a scoping review using Arksey and O’Malley methodology to comprehensively map current evidence on public involvement and engagement in big data research. Databases (CINAHL, Health Research Premium Collection, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science) and grey literature will be searched for eligible papers. We provide a narrative description of the results based on a thematic analysis. In the second stage, out of papers found in the scoping review which discuss involvement and engagement strategies, we will conduct a systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, exploring the delivery and effectiveness of these strategies. We will conduct a qualitative synthesis. Relevant results from the quantitative studies will be extracted and placed under qualitative themes. Individual studies will be appraised through Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), we will then assess the overall confidence in each finding through Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research (GRADE-CERQual). Results will be reported in a thematic and narrative way.Ethics and dissemination This protocol sets out how the review will be conducted to ensure rigour and transparency. Public advisors were involved in its development. Ethics approval is not required. Review findings will be presented at conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/8/e050167.full |
| spellingShingle | Lucy Frith Naheed Tahir Saiqa Ahmed Piotr Teodorowski Elisa Jones Public involvement and engagement in big data research: protocol for a scoping review and a systematic review of delivery and effectiveness of strategies for involvement and engagement BMJ Open |
| title | Public involvement and engagement in big data research: protocol for a scoping review and a systematic review of delivery and effectiveness of strategies for involvement and engagement |
| title_full | Public involvement and engagement in big data research: protocol for a scoping review and a systematic review of delivery and effectiveness of strategies for involvement and engagement |
| title_fullStr | Public involvement and engagement in big data research: protocol for a scoping review and a systematic review of delivery and effectiveness of strategies for involvement and engagement |
| title_full_unstemmed | Public involvement and engagement in big data research: protocol for a scoping review and a systematic review of delivery and effectiveness of strategies for involvement and engagement |
| title_short | Public involvement and engagement in big data research: protocol for a scoping review and a systematic review of delivery and effectiveness of strategies for involvement and engagement |
| title_sort | public involvement and engagement in big data research protocol for a scoping review and a systematic review of delivery and effectiveness of strategies for involvement and engagement |
| url | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/8/e050167.full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lucyfrith publicinvolvementandengagementinbigdataresearchprotocolforascopingreviewandasystematicreviewofdeliveryandeffectivenessofstrategiesforinvolvementandengagement AT naheedtahir publicinvolvementandengagementinbigdataresearchprotocolforascopingreviewandasystematicreviewofdeliveryandeffectivenessofstrategiesforinvolvementandengagement AT saiqaahmed publicinvolvementandengagementinbigdataresearchprotocolforascopingreviewandasystematicreviewofdeliveryandeffectivenessofstrategiesforinvolvementandengagement AT piotrteodorowski publicinvolvementandengagementinbigdataresearchprotocolforascopingreviewandasystematicreviewofdeliveryandeffectivenessofstrategiesforinvolvementandengagement AT elisajones publicinvolvementandengagementinbigdataresearchprotocolforascopingreviewandasystematicreviewofdeliveryandeffectivenessofstrategiesforinvolvementandengagement |