Identification of soil texture and color using machine learning algorithms and satellite imagery

Abstract The demand for high-quality and cost-effective soil information is increasing due to its importance in land-use planning and precision agriculture. This study aimed to estimate soil texture and color using satellite imagery as input variables for support vector regression (SVR) and decision...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jiyang Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-08-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-17166-z
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849226405817090048
author Jiyang Wang
author_facet Jiyang Wang
author_sort Jiyang Wang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The demand for high-quality and cost-effective soil information is increasing due to its importance in land-use planning and precision agriculture. This study aimed to estimate soil texture and color using satellite imagery as input variables for support vector regression (SVR) and decision tree regression (DTR) models. Soil properties, including soil texture (clay, silt, and sand) and color components (Hue, Value, and Chroma), were measured. Additionally, a wide range of indices derived from MODIS sensor imagery were calculated. Duncan’s test at a 5% significance level revealed significant temporal differences among the indices, although no significant differences were observed in the mean indices concerning soil texture variability. The results of error metrics, including root mean squared error (RMSE), absolute mean absolute percentage error (AMAPE), mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), and ratio of performance to deviation (RPD), demonstrated the superiority of the SVR method over the DTR method. Soil texture classification using the soil texture triangle and validation methods showed good agreement between measured and predicted data using the SVR approach. The lowest RMSE was observed for Hue, indicating the most accurate prediction, whereas sand showed the highest error. The differences in error metrics, including RMSE, AMAPE, MAE, MSE, and RPD, between SVR and DTR methods were 0, 0.2, 0, 0, and 0.8 for Hue and 0.41, 5, 0.1, 0.1, and 0.87 for sand, respectively. For future research, it is recommended to explore the combination of SVR with optimization techniques such as genetic algorithms to further improve the accuracy of soil texture and color predictions.
format Article
id doaj-art-1ae28ee64e2e4005afe923f40ad2ce0f
institution Kabale University
issn 2045-2322
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj-art-1ae28ee64e2e4005afe923f40ad2ce0f2025-08-24T11:18:03ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222025-08-0115111410.1038/s41598-025-17166-zIdentification of soil texture and color using machine learning algorithms and satellite imageryJiyang Wang0School of Artificial Intelligence, Shenyang University of TechnologyAbstract The demand for high-quality and cost-effective soil information is increasing due to its importance in land-use planning and precision agriculture. This study aimed to estimate soil texture and color using satellite imagery as input variables for support vector regression (SVR) and decision tree regression (DTR) models. Soil properties, including soil texture (clay, silt, and sand) and color components (Hue, Value, and Chroma), were measured. Additionally, a wide range of indices derived from MODIS sensor imagery were calculated. Duncan’s test at a 5% significance level revealed significant temporal differences among the indices, although no significant differences were observed in the mean indices concerning soil texture variability. The results of error metrics, including root mean squared error (RMSE), absolute mean absolute percentage error (AMAPE), mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), and ratio of performance to deviation (RPD), demonstrated the superiority of the SVR method over the DTR method. Soil texture classification using the soil texture triangle and validation methods showed good agreement between measured and predicted data using the SVR approach. The lowest RMSE was observed for Hue, indicating the most accurate prediction, whereas sand showed the highest error. The differences in error metrics, including RMSE, AMAPE, MAE, MSE, and RPD, between SVR and DTR methods were 0, 0.2, 0, 0, and 0.8 for Hue and 0.41, 5, 0.1, 0.1, and 0.87 for sand, respectively. For future research, it is recommended to explore the combination of SVR with optimization techniques such as genetic algorithms to further improve the accuracy of soil texture and color predictions.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-17166-zRegression treeSoil colorSoil textureSupport vector regression
spellingShingle Jiyang Wang
Identification of soil texture and color using machine learning algorithms and satellite imagery
Scientific Reports
Regression tree
Soil color
Soil texture
Support vector regression
title Identification of soil texture and color using machine learning algorithms and satellite imagery
title_full Identification of soil texture and color using machine learning algorithms and satellite imagery
title_fullStr Identification of soil texture and color using machine learning algorithms and satellite imagery
title_full_unstemmed Identification of soil texture and color using machine learning algorithms and satellite imagery
title_short Identification of soil texture and color using machine learning algorithms and satellite imagery
title_sort identification of soil texture and color using machine learning algorithms and satellite imagery
topic Regression tree
Soil color
Soil texture
Support vector regression
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-17166-z
work_keys_str_mv AT jiyangwang identificationofsoiltextureandcolorusingmachinelearningalgorithmsandsatelliteimagery