An analysis of physical activity coping plans: mapping barriers and coping strategies based on user ratings

Introduction: Personalising recommendations for physical activity coping plans can help bridging the physical activity intention-behaviour gap. Data-driven ‘black-box’ approaches result in recommendations that prove difficult to explain, and may have undesired consequences. This study aimed to expli...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maya Braun, Geert Crombez, Femke De Backere, Emma Tack, Annick L. De Paepe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2024-12-01
Series:Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/21642850.2024.2434140
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846140252748513280
author Maya Braun
Geert Crombez
Femke De Backere
Emma Tack
Annick L. De Paepe
author_facet Maya Braun
Geert Crombez
Femke De Backere
Emma Tack
Annick L. De Paepe
author_sort Maya Braun
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Personalising recommendations for physical activity coping plans can help bridging the physical activity intention-behaviour gap. Data-driven ‘black-box’ approaches result in recommendations that prove difficult to explain, and may have undesired consequences. This study aimed to explicitly link barriers and coping strategies using end-user input.Method: 152 participants (85 female) took part in an online task. Participants were asked to judge the relevance of coping strategies for barriers to physical activity, and under which circumstances coping strategies were relevant for a given barrier. Data was aggregated and heat maps were produced. Necessary conditions for the relevance of each combination were coded and their frequencies were reported.Results: Relevance of 1570 combinations of barriers and coping strategies were assessed, with 2 combinations rated ‘always relevant’ by all participants, and 37 combinations rated as ‘always relevant’ by no participants. Barriers differ strongly in how many coping strategies are relevant for them, and coping strategies differ strongly in how many barriers they are relevant for. Resulting aggregates concerning the average rating as ‘never relevant’, ‘always relevant’ and ‘relevant under certain conditions’ are shared for each barrier coping strategy combination, as are the conditions associated with different barriers and coping strategies.Discussion: This study introduces a novel method to create rules for recommendations using input from stakeholders. The datasets created throughout this research are available for re-use in future research, as well as for clinical practice and (digital) intervention development. This data can be used as a base for explainable personalised recommendations for physical activity coping plans.
format Article
id doaj-art-1ac8a3c465084531967e404fdec3d9df
institution Kabale University
issn 2164-2850
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine
spelling doaj-art-1ac8a3c465084531967e404fdec3d9df2024-12-05T15:52:33ZengTaylor & Francis GroupHealth Psychology and Behavioral Medicine2164-28502024-12-0112110.1080/21642850.2024.2434140An analysis of physical activity coping plans: mapping barriers and coping strategies based on user ratingsMaya Braun0Geert Crombez1Femke De Backere2Emma Tack3Annick L. De Paepe4Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, BelgiumDepartment of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, BelgiumDepartment of Information technology, Ghent University – imec, Ghent, BelgiumDepartment of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, BelgiumDepartment of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, BelgiumIntroduction: Personalising recommendations for physical activity coping plans can help bridging the physical activity intention-behaviour gap. Data-driven ‘black-box’ approaches result in recommendations that prove difficult to explain, and may have undesired consequences. This study aimed to explicitly link barriers and coping strategies using end-user input.Method: 152 participants (85 female) took part in an online task. Participants were asked to judge the relevance of coping strategies for barriers to physical activity, and under which circumstances coping strategies were relevant for a given barrier. Data was aggregated and heat maps were produced. Necessary conditions for the relevance of each combination were coded and their frequencies were reported.Results: Relevance of 1570 combinations of barriers and coping strategies were assessed, with 2 combinations rated ‘always relevant’ by all participants, and 37 combinations rated as ‘always relevant’ by no participants. Barriers differ strongly in how many coping strategies are relevant for them, and coping strategies differ strongly in how many barriers they are relevant for. Resulting aggregates concerning the average rating as ‘never relevant’, ‘always relevant’ and ‘relevant under certain conditions’ are shared for each barrier coping strategy combination, as are the conditions associated with different barriers and coping strategies.Discussion: This study introduces a novel method to create rules for recommendations using input from stakeholders. The datasets created throughout this research are available for re-use in future research, as well as for clinical practice and (digital) intervention development. This data can be used as a base for explainable personalised recommendations for physical activity coping plans.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/21642850.2024.2434140Physical activitypersonalisationdigital healthcoping planninghealth behaviour
spellingShingle Maya Braun
Geert Crombez
Femke De Backere
Emma Tack
Annick L. De Paepe
An analysis of physical activity coping plans: mapping barriers and coping strategies based on user ratings
Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine
Physical activity
personalisation
digital health
coping planning
health behaviour
title An analysis of physical activity coping plans: mapping barriers and coping strategies based on user ratings
title_full An analysis of physical activity coping plans: mapping barriers and coping strategies based on user ratings
title_fullStr An analysis of physical activity coping plans: mapping barriers and coping strategies based on user ratings
title_full_unstemmed An analysis of physical activity coping plans: mapping barriers and coping strategies based on user ratings
title_short An analysis of physical activity coping plans: mapping barriers and coping strategies based on user ratings
title_sort analysis of physical activity coping plans mapping barriers and coping strategies based on user ratings
topic Physical activity
personalisation
digital health
coping planning
health behaviour
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/21642850.2024.2434140
work_keys_str_mv AT mayabraun ananalysisofphysicalactivitycopingplansmappingbarriersandcopingstrategiesbasedonuserratings
AT geertcrombez ananalysisofphysicalactivitycopingplansmappingbarriersandcopingstrategiesbasedonuserratings
AT femkedebackere ananalysisofphysicalactivitycopingplansmappingbarriersandcopingstrategiesbasedonuserratings
AT emmatack ananalysisofphysicalactivitycopingplansmappingbarriersandcopingstrategiesbasedonuserratings
AT annickldepaepe ananalysisofphysicalactivitycopingplansmappingbarriersandcopingstrategiesbasedonuserratings
AT mayabraun analysisofphysicalactivitycopingplansmappingbarriersandcopingstrategiesbasedonuserratings
AT geertcrombez analysisofphysicalactivitycopingplansmappingbarriersandcopingstrategiesbasedonuserratings
AT femkedebackere analysisofphysicalactivitycopingplansmappingbarriersandcopingstrategiesbasedonuserratings
AT emmatack analysisofphysicalactivitycopingplansmappingbarriersandcopingstrategiesbasedonuserratings
AT annickldepaepe analysisofphysicalactivitycopingplansmappingbarriersandcopingstrategiesbasedonuserratings