Articuler construction des savoirs, pratiques écrites et orales au lycée : le rôle du débat interprétatif délibératif en classe de français

Despite recommendations outlined in educational curricula over the last decade, the spoken debate form has struggled to establish itself as a standard practice in education. The use of spoken debates has suffered considerably from the contaminating effects of social practices that fail to ensure eff...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marie-France Rossignol, Brigitte Marin
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Nantes Université 2011-10-01
Series:Recherches en Éducation
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/ree/8895
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841548373973270528
author Marie-France Rossignol
Brigitte Marin
author_facet Marie-France Rossignol
Brigitte Marin
author_sort Marie-France Rossignol
collection DOAJ
description Despite recommendations outlined in educational curricula over the last decade, the spoken debate form has struggled to establish itself as a standard practice in education. The use of spoken debates has suffered considerably from the contaminating effects of social practices that fail to ensure effective learning (such as media debates). Yet the debate form has many advantages (particularly in French). Provided they are linked to subject-specific objectives, are based on more constructive social practices, and are incorporated as a standard and highly regulated practice, spoken debates foster the development of a wide range of skill-sets in a context in which differences between pupils tend to be reduced. Based on an analysis of a prototypical deliberative debate conducted in seconde (first year of lycée, or French sixth form college), this paper shows how spoken debates create a safe collaborative space of exchange and encourage lycée pupils to adopt a reflexive attitude that supports learning (particularly in dialogic and interactional areas). While the high-level cognitive activity targeted by spoken debates cannot meet the demands of all learning objectives, the debate form consolidates subject-specific and cross-disciplinary knowledge and skills on a more egalitarian basis. More specifically, spoken debates foster the development of specialized literary reading skills and broader social and civic skills that subtend the process of individual identity construction in a group class context.
format Article
id doaj-art-1a6b72b376d04c75b2962fe73534e04a
institution Kabale University
issn 1954-3077
language fra
publishDate 2011-10-01
publisher Nantes Université
record_format Article
series Recherches en Éducation
spelling doaj-art-1a6b72b376d04c75b2962fe73534e04a2025-01-10T14:06:15ZfraNantes UniversitéRecherches en Éducation1954-30772011-10-0110.4000/ree.8895Articuler construction des savoirs, pratiques écrites et orales au lycée : le rôle du débat interprétatif délibératif en classe de françaisMarie-France RossignolBrigitte MarinDespite recommendations outlined in educational curricula over the last decade, the spoken debate form has struggled to establish itself as a standard practice in education. The use of spoken debates has suffered considerably from the contaminating effects of social practices that fail to ensure effective learning (such as media debates). Yet the debate form has many advantages (particularly in French). Provided they are linked to subject-specific objectives, are based on more constructive social practices, and are incorporated as a standard and highly regulated practice, spoken debates foster the development of a wide range of skill-sets in a context in which differences between pupils tend to be reduced. Based on an analysis of a prototypical deliberative debate conducted in seconde (first year of lycée, or French sixth form college), this paper shows how spoken debates create a safe collaborative space of exchange and encourage lycée pupils to adopt a reflexive attitude that supports learning (particularly in dialogic and interactional areas). While the high-level cognitive activity targeted by spoken debates cannot meet the demands of all learning objectives, the debate form consolidates subject-specific and cross-disciplinary knowledge and skills on a more egalitarian basis. More specifically, spoken debates foster the development of specialized literary reading skills and broader social and civic skills that subtend the process of individual identity construction in a group class context.https://journals.openedition.org/ree/8895language and interactionstudent-teacher relations and interactionswriting and readingfrench (teaching/education/relationship)pedagogy: methods and tools
spellingShingle Marie-France Rossignol
Brigitte Marin
Articuler construction des savoirs, pratiques écrites et orales au lycée : le rôle du débat interprétatif délibératif en classe de français
Recherches en Éducation
language and interaction
student-teacher relations and interactions
writing and reading
french (teaching/education/relationship)
pedagogy: methods and tools
title Articuler construction des savoirs, pratiques écrites et orales au lycée : le rôle du débat interprétatif délibératif en classe de français
title_full Articuler construction des savoirs, pratiques écrites et orales au lycée : le rôle du débat interprétatif délibératif en classe de français
title_fullStr Articuler construction des savoirs, pratiques écrites et orales au lycée : le rôle du débat interprétatif délibératif en classe de français
title_full_unstemmed Articuler construction des savoirs, pratiques écrites et orales au lycée : le rôle du débat interprétatif délibératif en classe de français
title_short Articuler construction des savoirs, pratiques écrites et orales au lycée : le rôle du débat interprétatif délibératif en classe de français
title_sort articuler construction des savoirs pratiques ecrites et orales au lycee le role du debat interpretatif deliberatif en classe de francais
topic language and interaction
student-teacher relations and interactions
writing and reading
french (teaching/education/relationship)
pedagogy: methods and tools
url https://journals.openedition.org/ree/8895
work_keys_str_mv AT mariefrancerossignol articulerconstructiondessavoirspratiquesecritesetoralesaulyceeleroledudebatinterpretatifdeliberatifenclassedefrancais
AT brigittemarin articulerconstructiondessavoirspratiquesecritesetoralesaulyceeleroledudebatinterpretatifdeliberatifenclassedefrancais