Alveolar ridge augmentation using distraction osteogenesis: a clinical trial
ABSTRACT: Background: Severely resorbed ridges present a great challenge to prosthodontic rehabilitation. Available reconstructive options include autologous/alloplastic augmentation with questionable results, or regeneration of new bone under gradual and controlled tension using distraction osteog...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2012-01-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212426812600074 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1846159726002307072 |
|---|---|
| author | Anand Shukla Saumyendra V Singh Sumit Kumar Divya Mehrotra S Mohammad Stuti Singh |
| author_facet | Anand Shukla Saumyendra V Singh Sumit Kumar Divya Mehrotra S Mohammad Stuti Singh |
| author_sort | Anand Shukla |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | ABSTRACT: Background: Severely resorbed ridges present a great challenge to prosthodontic rehabilitation. Available reconstructive options include autologous/alloplastic augmentation with questionable results, or regeneration of new bone under gradual and controlled tension using distraction osteogenesis. This study focused on use of distraction osteogenesis for the treatment of vertically deficient alveolar ridges to assess its feasibility and outcome. Materials and Methods: Alveolar distraction osteogenesis (ADO) was studied at 10 different intra-oral, partial or complete edentulous sites. After a latency period of 5 days, distraction was carried out for 6–7 days at the rate of 0.5 mm every 12 hours (1 mm/day). Distractor was removed after a consolidation period of 12 weeks. Results: The mean height gained at the 10 intra-oral sites was 4.8 mm with standard deviation of ± 0.056. The mean follow-up period was 2 years. Complications of therapy included hardware failure, wound gape and extra-oral scar. The overall complication rate was 10%. Conclusion: Distraction osteogenesis is a promising option to aid uneventful prosthodontic rehabilitation of severe vertically resorbed alveolar ridges. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-196a8e7bb51c4d8da417f03cf9de389f |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2212-4268 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2012-01-01 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research |
| spelling | doaj-art-196a8e7bb51c4d8da417f03cf9de389f2024-11-23T06:26:10ZengElsevierJournal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research2212-42682012-01-01212529Alveolar ridge augmentation using distraction osteogenesis: a clinical trialAnand Shukla0Saumyendra V Singh1Sumit Kumar2Divya Mehrotra3S Mohammad4Stuti Singh5Senior Lecturer, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Rajasthan Dental College, JaipurAssistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, CSM Medical University, Lucknow, IndiaPhD Student, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, CSM Medical University, Lucknow, IndiaProfessor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, CSM Medical University, Lucknow, India; Correspondence: Dr. Divya MehrotraProfessor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, CSM Medical University, Lucknow, IndiaResident, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, CSM Medical University, Lucknow, IndiaABSTRACT: Background: Severely resorbed ridges present a great challenge to prosthodontic rehabilitation. Available reconstructive options include autologous/alloplastic augmentation with questionable results, or regeneration of new bone under gradual and controlled tension using distraction osteogenesis. This study focused on use of distraction osteogenesis for the treatment of vertically deficient alveolar ridges to assess its feasibility and outcome. Materials and Methods: Alveolar distraction osteogenesis (ADO) was studied at 10 different intra-oral, partial or complete edentulous sites. After a latency period of 5 days, distraction was carried out for 6–7 days at the rate of 0.5 mm every 12 hours (1 mm/day). Distractor was removed after a consolidation period of 12 weeks. Results: The mean height gained at the 10 intra-oral sites was 4.8 mm with standard deviation of ± 0.056. The mean follow-up period was 2 years. Complications of therapy included hardware failure, wound gape and extra-oral scar. The overall complication rate was 10%. Conclusion: Distraction osteogenesis is a promising option to aid uneventful prosthodontic rehabilitation of severe vertically resorbed alveolar ridges.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212426812600074Distraction osteogenesisresorbed residual ridgevertical bone gain |
| spellingShingle | Anand Shukla Saumyendra V Singh Sumit Kumar Divya Mehrotra S Mohammad Stuti Singh Alveolar ridge augmentation using distraction osteogenesis: a clinical trial Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research Distraction osteogenesis resorbed residual ridge vertical bone gain |
| title | Alveolar ridge augmentation using distraction osteogenesis: a clinical trial |
| title_full | Alveolar ridge augmentation using distraction osteogenesis: a clinical trial |
| title_fullStr | Alveolar ridge augmentation using distraction osteogenesis: a clinical trial |
| title_full_unstemmed | Alveolar ridge augmentation using distraction osteogenesis: a clinical trial |
| title_short | Alveolar ridge augmentation using distraction osteogenesis: a clinical trial |
| title_sort | alveolar ridge augmentation using distraction osteogenesis a clinical trial |
| topic | Distraction osteogenesis resorbed residual ridge vertical bone gain |
| url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212426812600074 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT anandshukla alveolarridgeaugmentationusingdistractionosteogenesisaclinicaltrial AT saumyendravsingh alveolarridgeaugmentationusingdistractionosteogenesisaclinicaltrial AT sumitkumar alveolarridgeaugmentationusingdistractionosteogenesisaclinicaltrial AT divyamehrotra alveolarridgeaugmentationusingdistractionosteogenesisaclinicaltrial AT smohammad alveolarridgeaugmentationusingdistractionosteogenesisaclinicaltrial AT stutisingh alveolarridgeaugmentationusingdistractionosteogenesisaclinicaltrial |