Middle sentences: An argument for conceptual structure
Middle sentences in English are only partly described within the Government and Binding theory. Some semantic and discourse generalizations which are integral to the meaning of these constructions are just set aside, if they are mentioned at all. The theory of conceptual semantics developed by Ray J...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universidad de Cádiz
2012-11-01
|
| Series: | Pragmalingüística |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://localhost:8888/ojs-uca.3.3.x/index.php/pragma/article/view/363 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Middle sentences in English are only partly described within the Government and Binding theory. Some semantic and discourse generalizations which are integral to the meaning of these constructions are just set aside, if they are mentioned at all. The theory of conceptual semantics developed by Ray Jackendoff (1983, 1987, 1990) presents the first viable alternative to the syntactic strategies descending from Chomsky’s theory. In this paper I will examine the middle voice and show how several Government and Binding analyses of these constructions fail to account for important parts of the data. I hope to persuade the reader that a conceptual structure analysis of this phenomenon provides a more appealing solution which fully integrates the syntactic and semantic generalizations.
|
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1133-682X 2445-3064 |