Pas de provenance sans contexte

If one of the aims of art history is to understand better the original meaning of the works studied, then an historical methodology is absolutely essential to the identification and interpretation of precolonial objects. This essay focuses on 16th- and 17th-century ivory carvings identified as ‘Luso...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Peter Mark
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Institut des Mondes Africains 2019-12-01
Series:Afriques
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/afriques/2792
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841552411633647616
author Peter Mark
author_facet Peter Mark
author_sort Peter Mark
collection DOAJ
description If one of the aims of art history is to understand better the original meaning of the works studied, then an historical methodology is absolutely essential to the identification and interpretation of precolonial objects. This essay focuses on 16th- and 17th-century ivory carvings identified as ‘Luso-African’. Both the geographical provenance and the ‘ethnic’ or cultural origins of the presumed artists have been mistakenly identified. Geographical terms associated with the Upper Guinea Coast in the 16th century do not correspond to the region these terms are associated with today. Likewise, the term used to identify the culture of the artists, ‘Sape’, does not correspond to any contemporary group using that designation.
format Article
id doaj-art-1852799a05ec4a11b69064ea14fd358b
institution Kabale University
issn 2108-6796
language deu
publishDate 2019-12-01
publisher Institut des Mondes Africains
record_format Article
series Afriques
spelling doaj-art-1852799a05ec4a11b69064ea14fd358b2025-01-09T13:03:03ZdeuInstitut des Mondes AfricainsAfriques2108-67962019-12-011010.4000/afriques.2792Pas de provenance sans contextePeter MarkIf one of the aims of art history is to understand better the original meaning of the works studied, then an historical methodology is absolutely essential to the identification and interpretation of precolonial objects. This essay focuses on 16th- and 17th-century ivory carvings identified as ‘Luso-African’. Both the geographical provenance and the ‘ethnic’ or cultural origins of the presumed artists have been mistakenly identified. Geographical terms associated with the Upper Guinea Coast in the 16th century do not correspond to the region these terms are associated with today. Likewise, the term used to identify the culture of the artists, ‘Sape’, does not correspond to any contemporary group using that designation.https://journals.openedition.org/afriques/2792styleethnic grouplabelshistorical methodologyprecolonial art
spellingShingle Peter Mark
Pas de provenance sans contexte
Afriques
style
ethnic group
labels
historical methodology
precolonial art
title Pas de provenance sans contexte
title_full Pas de provenance sans contexte
title_fullStr Pas de provenance sans contexte
title_full_unstemmed Pas de provenance sans contexte
title_short Pas de provenance sans contexte
title_sort pas de provenance sans contexte
topic style
ethnic group
labels
historical methodology
precolonial art
url https://journals.openedition.org/afriques/2792
work_keys_str_mv AT petermark pasdeprovenancesanscontexte