L’encadrement collégial : complexité et enjeux pour la professionnalisation de l’accompagnement doctoral
In a context of professionalization of doctoral training, doctoral supervision refers to a decompartmentalization of the doctoral student-supervisor pair. If team supervision has become an international standard and a common practice in France, the literature in the field remains focused on the dual...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fra |
| Published: |
Association Internationale de Pédagogie Universitaire
2023-01-01
|
| Series: | Revue Internationale de Pédagogie de l’Enseignement Supérieur |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/ripes/4476 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841546555366047744 |
|---|---|
| author | Nathalie Girard |
| author_facet | Nathalie Girard |
| author_sort | Nathalie Girard |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In a context of professionalization of doctoral training, doctoral supervision refers to a decompartmentalization of the doctoral student-supervisor pair. If team supervision has become an international standard and a common practice in France, the literature in the field remains focused on the dual relationship between a doctoral student and their supervisor. The objective of this article is to describe the diversity of organizational configurations of doctoral supervision teams. From a training system at INRAE, we have built a database on 76 theses, with the structural characteristics of the thesis and its support, but also the difficulties expressed by the PhD students and supervisors. The analysis of these data allows us to identify four types of doctoral supervision teams, beyond the pairs between a doctoral student and a supervisor. The organizational forms thus identified, sometimes classic, others more complex constituting multidisciplinary and/or multi-institutional teams around the doctoral student, sometimes extended to socio-economic actors, are described and confronted with the difficulties expressed by the stakeholders of these theses. The cross-sectional analysis of these results allows us to identify avenues for the training of doctoral students and supervisors, critical issues for the institutions that host these theses, but also research perspectives in the field of doctoral support. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-184ecff9e23c4e15a732fa16dbfdf606 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2076-8427 |
| language | fra |
| publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
| publisher | Association Internationale de Pédagogie Universitaire |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Revue Internationale de Pédagogie de l’Enseignement Supérieur |
| spelling | doaj-art-184ecff9e23c4e15a732fa16dbfdf6062025-01-10T16:18:23ZfraAssociation Internationale de Pédagogie UniversitaireRevue Internationale de Pédagogie de l’Enseignement Supérieur2076-84272023-01-013910.4000/ripes.4476L’encadrement collégial : complexité et enjeux pour la professionnalisation de l’accompagnement doctoralNathalie GirardIn a context of professionalization of doctoral training, doctoral supervision refers to a decompartmentalization of the doctoral student-supervisor pair. If team supervision has become an international standard and a common practice in France, the literature in the field remains focused on the dual relationship between a doctoral student and their supervisor. The objective of this article is to describe the diversity of organizational configurations of doctoral supervision teams. From a training system at INRAE, we have built a database on 76 theses, with the structural characteristics of the thesis and its support, but also the difficulties expressed by the PhD students and supervisors. The analysis of these data allows us to identify four types of doctoral supervision teams, beyond the pairs between a doctoral student and a supervisor. The organizational forms thus identified, sometimes classic, others more complex constituting multidisciplinary and/or multi-institutional teams around the doctoral student, sometimes extended to socio-economic actors, are described and confronted with the difficulties expressed by the stakeholders of these theses. The cross-sectional analysis of these results allows us to identify avenues for the training of doctoral students and supervisors, critical issues for the institutions that host these theses, but also research perspectives in the field of doctoral support.https://journals.openedition.org/ripes/4476interdisciplinaritétypologieencadrement doctoral collégialconfiguration organisationnellerecherches finalisées |
| spellingShingle | Nathalie Girard L’encadrement collégial : complexité et enjeux pour la professionnalisation de l’accompagnement doctoral Revue Internationale de Pédagogie de l’Enseignement Supérieur interdisciplinarité typologie encadrement doctoral collégial configuration organisationnelle recherches finalisées |
| title | L’encadrement collégial : complexité et enjeux pour la professionnalisation de l’accompagnement doctoral |
| title_full | L’encadrement collégial : complexité et enjeux pour la professionnalisation de l’accompagnement doctoral |
| title_fullStr | L’encadrement collégial : complexité et enjeux pour la professionnalisation de l’accompagnement doctoral |
| title_full_unstemmed | L’encadrement collégial : complexité et enjeux pour la professionnalisation de l’accompagnement doctoral |
| title_short | L’encadrement collégial : complexité et enjeux pour la professionnalisation de l’accompagnement doctoral |
| title_sort | l encadrement collegial complexite et enjeux pour la professionnalisation de l accompagnement doctoral |
| topic | interdisciplinarité typologie encadrement doctoral collégial configuration organisationnelle recherches finalisées |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/ripes/4476 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT nathaliegirard lencadrementcollegialcomplexiteetenjeuxpourlaprofessionnalisationdelaccompagnementdoctoral |