Evolutions of Anisotropic Hydraulic Properties of Rough-Walled Rock Fractures under Different Shear Displacements

Four cylindrical sandstone samples were extracted from the original rectangular sample with a rough-walled fracture. Each drilling angle (θ) of cylindrical sandstone samples is different to consider the anisotropies of rough-walled rock fractures. For each sample, different flow velocities ranging f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dapeng Lu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-01-01
Series:Geofluids
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/8841361
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849308812524126208
author Dapeng Lu
author_facet Dapeng Lu
author_sort Dapeng Lu
collection DOAJ
description Four cylindrical sandstone samples were extracted from the original rectangular sample with a rough-walled fracture. Each drilling angle (θ) of cylindrical sandstone samples is different to consider the anisotropies of rough-walled rock fractures. For each sample, different flow velocities ranging from 0 m/s to 13 m/s were designed. For a given flow velocity, a series of different confining pressures (σn), including 1.5 MPa, 2.5 MPa, and 3.5 MPa, were applied on the fractured samples. The hydraulic properties of each cylindrical sandstone sample were tested under different shear displacements (us) and σn. The results show that the hydraulic gradient (J) shows an increasing trend with the increment of σn. With the increment of the Reynolds number (Re), the transmissivity (T) decreases in the form of the quadratic function. The normalized transmissivity (T/T0) decreases with the increment of J. The variations in T/T0 with J can be divided into three stages. The first stage is that T/T0 approximately holds a constant value of 1.0 when J is small indicating that the fluid flow is in the linear regime. The last two stages are that T/T0 decreases with the continuous increase of J, and the reduction rate first increases and then decreases. The critical Reynolds’ number (Rec) of the sample angle with a drilling angle of 90° is different from that of other samples. The corresponding Rec is 6.52, 28.73, and 32.1 when the shear displacement us=2 mm, 3 mm, and 4 mm, respectively. The variations in Rec and J along different drilling angles are significantly obvious. When the confining pressure is large, the effect of anisotropy on Rec is much greater than that of confining pressure.
format Article
id doaj-art-17e8a5b82c724e85add422d3b100cac0
institution Kabale University
issn 1468-8123
language English
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Geofluids
spelling doaj-art-17e8a5b82c724e85add422d3b100cac02025-08-20T03:54:20ZengWileyGeofluids1468-81232023-01-01202310.1155/2023/8841361Evolutions of Anisotropic Hydraulic Properties of Rough-Walled Rock Fractures under Different Shear DisplacementsDapeng Lu0China Railway No. 10 Engineering Group Co. Ltd.Four cylindrical sandstone samples were extracted from the original rectangular sample with a rough-walled fracture. Each drilling angle (θ) of cylindrical sandstone samples is different to consider the anisotropies of rough-walled rock fractures. For each sample, different flow velocities ranging from 0 m/s to 13 m/s were designed. For a given flow velocity, a series of different confining pressures (σn), including 1.5 MPa, 2.5 MPa, and 3.5 MPa, were applied on the fractured samples. The hydraulic properties of each cylindrical sandstone sample were tested under different shear displacements (us) and σn. The results show that the hydraulic gradient (J) shows an increasing trend with the increment of σn. With the increment of the Reynolds number (Re), the transmissivity (T) decreases in the form of the quadratic function. The normalized transmissivity (T/T0) decreases with the increment of J. The variations in T/T0 with J can be divided into three stages. The first stage is that T/T0 approximately holds a constant value of 1.0 when J is small indicating that the fluid flow is in the linear regime. The last two stages are that T/T0 decreases with the continuous increase of J, and the reduction rate first increases and then decreases. The critical Reynolds’ number (Rec) of the sample angle with a drilling angle of 90° is different from that of other samples. The corresponding Rec is 6.52, 28.73, and 32.1 when the shear displacement us=2 mm, 3 mm, and 4 mm, respectively. The variations in Rec and J along different drilling angles are significantly obvious. When the confining pressure is large, the effect of anisotropy on Rec is much greater than that of confining pressure.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/8841361
spellingShingle Dapeng Lu
Evolutions of Anisotropic Hydraulic Properties of Rough-Walled Rock Fractures under Different Shear Displacements
Geofluids
title Evolutions of Anisotropic Hydraulic Properties of Rough-Walled Rock Fractures under Different Shear Displacements
title_full Evolutions of Anisotropic Hydraulic Properties of Rough-Walled Rock Fractures under Different Shear Displacements
title_fullStr Evolutions of Anisotropic Hydraulic Properties of Rough-Walled Rock Fractures under Different Shear Displacements
title_full_unstemmed Evolutions of Anisotropic Hydraulic Properties of Rough-Walled Rock Fractures under Different Shear Displacements
title_short Evolutions of Anisotropic Hydraulic Properties of Rough-Walled Rock Fractures under Different Shear Displacements
title_sort evolutions of anisotropic hydraulic properties of rough walled rock fractures under different shear displacements
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/8841361
work_keys_str_mv AT dapenglu evolutionsofanisotropichydraulicpropertiesofroughwalledrockfracturesunderdifferentsheardisplacements