Evaluation of five questionnaires for obstructive sleep apnea screening in the elderly

Abstract Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) often leads to complications in the elderly. This study compares the usefulness of five screening tools for OSA in elderly patients. Data from elderly patients diagnosed with OSA, collected from the Sleep Medicine Center of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guan...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Riken Chen, Jinru Zhu, Yitian Yang, Weifeng Liao, Weilong Ye, Lianfang Du, Mingdi Chen, Yuan Zhang, Weimin Yao, Zhenzhen Zheng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-01-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-86041-8
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841544565095399424
author Riken Chen
Jinru Zhu
Yitian Yang
Weifeng Liao
Weilong Ye
Lianfang Du
Mingdi Chen
Yuan Zhang
Weimin Yao
Zhenzhen Zheng
author_facet Riken Chen
Jinru Zhu
Yitian Yang
Weifeng Liao
Weilong Ye
Lianfang Du
Mingdi Chen
Yuan Zhang
Weimin Yao
Zhenzhen Zheng
author_sort Riken Chen
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) often leads to complications in the elderly. This study compares the usefulness of five screening tools for OSA in elderly patients. Data from elderly patients diagnosed with OSA, collected from the Sleep Medicine Center of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from January 2012 to June 2017, is analyzed. The sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, area under the curve (AUC), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of the five screening tools are computed and compared. 273 elderly patients with suspected OSA are included, of whom 189 are male (69.2%). The Berlin Questionnaire has an AUC of 0.670 (95%CI: 0.611–0.725) at different cut-off points. The sensitivity and specificity of the Berlin Questionnaire are noticeably high at 0.653 (0.587–0.719) and 0.608 (0.497–0.719), 0.699 (0.621–0.776) and 0.533 (0.449–0.616), and 0.803 (0.713–0.892) and 0.503 (0.433–0.572) when the AHI is 5, 15, and 30 times/hour, respectively. The GOAL Questionnaire has the highest DOR at AHI cut-off points of 5 and 15 times/hour, while Berlin has the highest DOR at an AHI cut-off point of 30 times/hour. Comprehensive use of these five screening questionnaires for suspected OSA in elderly patients aged 60 years and older is valuable and worth promoting among the elderly population.
format Article
id doaj-art-17d79888c9434bc99e2274aa8330c79c
institution Kabale University
issn 2045-2322
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj-art-17d79888c9434bc99e2274aa8330c79c2025-01-12T12:24:25ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222025-01-011511910.1038/s41598-025-86041-8Evaluation of five questionnaires for obstructive sleep apnea screening in the elderlyRiken Chen0Jinru Zhu1Yitian Yang2Weifeng Liao3Weilong Ye4Lianfang Du5Mingdi Chen6Yuan Zhang7Weimin Yao8Zhenzhen Zheng9The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical UniversityThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical UniversityThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical UniversityThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical UniversityThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical UniversityThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical UniversityThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical UniversityThe First Clinical School of Medicine, Guangdong Medical UniversityThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical UniversityThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical UniversityAbstract Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) often leads to complications in the elderly. This study compares the usefulness of five screening tools for OSA in elderly patients. Data from elderly patients diagnosed with OSA, collected from the Sleep Medicine Center of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from January 2012 to June 2017, is analyzed. The sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, area under the curve (AUC), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of the five screening tools are computed and compared. 273 elderly patients with suspected OSA are included, of whom 189 are male (69.2%). The Berlin Questionnaire has an AUC of 0.670 (95%CI: 0.611–0.725) at different cut-off points. The sensitivity and specificity of the Berlin Questionnaire are noticeably high at 0.653 (0.587–0.719) and 0.608 (0.497–0.719), 0.699 (0.621–0.776) and 0.533 (0.449–0.616), and 0.803 (0.713–0.892) and 0.503 (0.433–0.572) when the AHI is 5, 15, and 30 times/hour, respectively. The GOAL Questionnaire has the highest DOR at AHI cut-off points of 5 and 15 times/hour, while Berlin has the highest DOR at an AHI cut-off point of 30 times/hour. Comprehensive use of these five screening questionnaires for suspected OSA in elderly patients aged 60 years and older is valuable and worth promoting among the elderly population.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-86041-8Obstructive sleep apneaElderly patientsNoSAS scoreEpworth Sleepiness ScaleGOAL questionnaireSTOP-Bang Questionnaire
spellingShingle Riken Chen
Jinru Zhu
Yitian Yang
Weifeng Liao
Weilong Ye
Lianfang Du
Mingdi Chen
Yuan Zhang
Weimin Yao
Zhenzhen Zheng
Evaluation of five questionnaires for obstructive sleep apnea screening in the elderly
Scientific Reports
Obstructive sleep apnea
Elderly patients
NoSAS score
Epworth Sleepiness Scale
GOAL questionnaire
STOP-Bang Questionnaire
title Evaluation of five questionnaires for obstructive sleep apnea screening in the elderly
title_full Evaluation of five questionnaires for obstructive sleep apnea screening in the elderly
title_fullStr Evaluation of five questionnaires for obstructive sleep apnea screening in the elderly
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of five questionnaires for obstructive sleep apnea screening in the elderly
title_short Evaluation of five questionnaires for obstructive sleep apnea screening in the elderly
title_sort evaluation of five questionnaires for obstructive sleep apnea screening in the elderly
topic Obstructive sleep apnea
Elderly patients
NoSAS score
Epworth Sleepiness Scale
GOAL questionnaire
STOP-Bang Questionnaire
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-86041-8
work_keys_str_mv AT rikenchen evaluationoffivequestionnairesforobstructivesleepapneascreeningintheelderly
AT jinruzhu evaluationoffivequestionnairesforobstructivesleepapneascreeningintheelderly
AT yitianyang evaluationoffivequestionnairesforobstructivesleepapneascreeningintheelderly
AT weifengliao evaluationoffivequestionnairesforobstructivesleepapneascreeningintheelderly
AT weilongye evaluationoffivequestionnairesforobstructivesleepapneascreeningintheelderly
AT lianfangdu evaluationoffivequestionnairesforobstructivesleepapneascreeningintheelderly
AT mingdichen evaluationoffivequestionnairesforobstructivesleepapneascreeningintheelderly
AT yuanzhang evaluationoffivequestionnairesforobstructivesleepapneascreeningintheelderly
AT weiminyao evaluationoffivequestionnairesforobstructivesleepapneascreeningintheelderly
AT zhenzhenzheng evaluationoffivequestionnairesforobstructivesleepapneascreeningintheelderly