Kesohihan Akidah Di Luar Empirisme: Menjawab Kritik Guru Gembul Melalui Metode Rasional Dan Kausalitas

This study explores the critique of empiricism toward Islamic creed (akidah) as presented by Jafar Rohadi (known as Guru Gembul), who argues that faith, creed, and the concept of divinity are unscientific and subjective because they cannot be empirically proven. Guru Gembul's views on creed ar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bagus Kusumo Hadi, Dewi Setia Wati, Muhammad Alvin Saputra, Abdul Qodir Zaelani, Dino Gautman Raharjo Hadi
Format: Article
Language:Arabic
Published: Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang, Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Pemikiran Islam 2024-12-01
Series:El-Fikr
Online Access:https://jurnal.radenfatah.ac.id/index.php/elfikr/article/view/26416
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841545882399408128
author Bagus Kusumo Hadi
Dewi Setia Wati
Muhammad Alvin Saputra
Abdul Qodir Zaelani
Dino Gautman Raharjo Hadi
author_facet Bagus Kusumo Hadi
Dewi Setia Wati
Muhammad Alvin Saputra
Abdul Qodir Zaelani
Dino Gautman Raharjo Hadi
author_sort Bagus Kusumo Hadi
collection DOAJ
description This study explores the critique of empiricism toward Islamic creed (akidah) as presented by Jafar Rohadi (known as Guru Gembul), who argues that faith, creed, and the concept of divinity are unscientific and subjective because they cannot be empirically proven. Guru Gembul's views on creed are framed as a product of secular epistemological hegemony, which limits knowledge to sensory experience. Through a qualitative-descriptive method based on literature review, this study compares the empiricist perspective with rational arguments from both Muslim and Western philosophers, such as Imam Al-Ghazali and Ramadhan Al-Buthi, who assert that scientific proof is not limited to empirical methods but also includes logic and causality. The study concludes that a rational approach is valid for scientifically proving the Islamic creed and that empiricism has limitations in explaining metaphysical reality. The implications of this research are to broaden the scope of scientific proof to encompass a rational understanding of Islamic creed and to enrich philosophical studies on faith within the context of scientific knowledge. Kata Kunci: Guru Gembul, creed (akidah), scientific proof, empirical method, rational method, causality, Islamic philosophy
format Article
id doaj-art-16e4841f9dd04b18b074eb47d196d79a
institution Kabale University
issn 2809-6657
2809-1728
language Arabic
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang, Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Pemikiran Islam
record_format Article
series El-Fikr
spelling doaj-art-16e4841f9dd04b18b074eb47d196d79a2025-01-11T07:17:37ZaraUniversitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang, Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Pemikiran IslamEl-Fikr2809-66572809-17282024-12-015210.19109/el-fikr.v5i2.26416Kesohihan Akidah Di Luar Empirisme: Menjawab Kritik Guru Gembul Melalui Metode Rasional Dan KausalitasBagus Kusumo Hadi0Dewi Setia Wati 1Muhammad Alvin Saputra2Abdul Qodir Zaelani3Dino Gautman Raharjo Hadi4Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan LampungUniversitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan LampungUniversitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan LampungUniversitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan LampungUniversitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung This study explores the critique of empiricism toward Islamic creed (akidah) as presented by Jafar Rohadi (known as Guru Gembul), who argues that faith, creed, and the concept of divinity are unscientific and subjective because they cannot be empirically proven. Guru Gembul's views on creed are framed as a product of secular epistemological hegemony, which limits knowledge to sensory experience. Through a qualitative-descriptive method based on literature review, this study compares the empiricist perspective with rational arguments from both Muslim and Western philosophers, such as Imam Al-Ghazali and Ramadhan Al-Buthi, who assert that scientific proof is not limited to empirical methods but also includes logic and causality. The study concludes that a rational approach is valid for scientifically proving the Islamic creed and that empiricism has limitations in explaining metaphysical reality. The implications of this research are to broaden the scope of scientific proof to encompass a rational understanding of Islamic creed and to enrich philosophical studies on faith within the context of scientific knowledge. Kata Kunci: Guru Gembul, creed (akidah), scientific proof, empirical method, rational method, causality, Islamic philosophy https://jurnal.radenfatah.ac.id/index.php/elfikr/article/view/26416
spellingShingle Bagus Kusumo Hadi
Dewi Setia Wati
Muhammad Alvin Saputra
Abdul Qodir Zaelani
Dino Gautman Raharjo Hadi
Kesohihan Akidah Di Luar Empirisme: Menjawab Kritik Guru Gembul Melalui Metode Rasional Dan Kausalitas
El-Fikr
title Kesohihan Akidah Di Luar Empirisme: Menjawab Kritik Guru Gembul Melalui Metode Rasional Dan Kausalitas
title_full Kesohihan Akidah Di Luar Empirisme: Menjawab Kritik Guru Gembul Melalui Metode Rasional Dan Kausalitas
title_fullStr Kesohihan Akidah Di Luar Empirisme: Menjawab Kritik Guru Gembul Melalui Metode Rasional Dan Kausalitas
title_full_unstemmed Kesohihan Akidah Di Luar Empirisme: Menjawab Kritik Guru Gembul Melalui Metode Rasional Dan Kausalitas
title_short Kesohihan Akidah Di Luar Empirisme: Menjawab Kritik Guru Gembul Melalui Metode Rasional Dan Kausalitas
title_sort kesohihan akidah di luar empirisme menjawab kritik guru gembul melalui metode rasional dan kausalitas
url https://jurnal.radenfatah.ac.id/index.php/elfikr/article/view/26416
work_keys_str_mv AT baguskusumohadi kesohihanakidahdiluarempirismemenjawabkritikgurugembulmelaluimetoderasionaldankausalitas
AT dewisetiawati kesohihanakidahdiluarempirismemenjawabkritikgurugembulmelaluimetoderasionaldankausalitas
AT muhammadalvinsaputra kesohihanakidahdiluarempirismemenjawabkritikgurugembulmelaluimetoderasionaldankausalitas
AT abdulqodirzaelani kesohihanakidahdiluarempirismemenjawabkritikgurugembulmelaluimetoderasionaldankausalitas
AT dinogautmanraharjohadi kesohihanakidahdiluarempirismemenjawabkritikgurugembulmelaluimetoderasionaldankausalitas