The use of Different Criteria Weighting and Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods for University Ranking: Two-Layer Copeland
Multi-criteria methods have attracted attention in academia and industry applications for effective decision making. Although there are many multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods, none of these methods are perfect and should be chosen according to the decision problem. Choosing the necessary...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Durmus Gunay
2024-03-01
|
| Series: | Üniversite Araştırmaları Dergisi |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/3569857 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841527483729444864 |
|---|---|
| author | Abdulkerim Güler Mesut Polatgil |
| author_facet | Abdulkerim Güler Mesut Polatgil |
| author_sort | Abdulkerim Güler |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Multi-criteria methods have attracted attention in academia and industry applications for effective decision making. Although there are many multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods, none of these methods are perfect and should be chosen according to the decision problem. Choosing the necessary decision support method to find the right solution that is suitable for the decision maker becomes an important problem. To solve this problem, methods such as Copeland and Borda combining the results of different MCDM methods are available and widely used. In this study, a new hybrid model is proposed based on twice combining the results of different MCDM methods with different criterion weighting methods. The proposed model has been tested on student satisfaction data of 20 foundation universities in Turkey. It has been shown that the final model named Ensemble Copeland can be used as a benchmark in MCDM problems |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-16875914d68f487987cfbf5e38541e1e |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2636-7459 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-03-01 |
| publisher | Durmus Gunay |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Üniversite Araştırmaları Dergisi |
| spelling | doaj-art-16875914d68f487987cfbf5e38541e1e2025-01-15T14:25:04ZengDurmus GunayÜniversite Araştırmaları Dergisi2636-74592024-03-0171607310.32329/uad.13983021214The use of Different Criteria Weighting and Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods for University Ranking: Two-Layer CopelandAbdulkerim Güler0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4220-918XMesut Polatgil1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7503-2977SİVAS CUMHURİYET ÜNİVERSİTESİSivas cumhuriyet üniversitesiMulti-criteria methods have attracted attention in academia and industry applications for effective decision making. Although there are many multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods, none of these methods are perfect and should be chosen according to the decision problem. Choosing the necessary decision support method to find the right solution that is suitable for the decision maker becomes an important problem. To solve this problem, methods such as Copeland and Borda combining the results of different MCDM methods are available and widely used. In this study, a new hybrid model is proposed based on twice combining the results of different MCDM methods with different criterion weighting methods. The proposed model has been tested on student satisfaction data of 20 foundation universities in Turkey. It has been shown that the final model named Ensemble Copeland can be used as a benchmark in MCDM problemshttps://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/3569857multi criteria decision makingdecision makinguniversitycopelandbordaçok kriterli karar vermekarar vermeüniversitecopelandborda |
| spellingShingle | Abdulkerim Güler Mesut Polatgil The use of Different Criteria Weighting and Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods for University Ranking: Two-Layer Copeland Üniversite Araştırmaları Dergisi multi criteria decision making decision making university copeland borda çok kriterli karar verme karar verme üniversite copeland borda |
| title | The use of Different Criteria Weighting and Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods for University Ranking: Two-Layer Copeland |
| title_full | The use of Different Criteria Weighting and Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods for University Ranking: Two-Layer Copeland |
| title_fullStr | The use of Different Criteria Weighting and Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods for University Ranking: Two-Layer Copeland |
| title_full_unstemmed | The use of Different Criteria Weighting and Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods for University Ranking: Two-Layer Copeland |
| title_short | The use of Different Criteria Weighting and Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods for University Ranking: Two-Layer Copeland |
| title_sort | use of different criteria weighting and multi criteria decision making methods for university ranking two layer copeland |
| topic | multi criteria decision making decision making university copeland borda çok kriterli karar verme karar verme üniversite copeland borda |
| url | https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/3569857 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT abdulkerimguler theuseofdifferentcriteriaweightingandmulticriteriadecisionmakingmethodsforuniversityrankingtwolayercopeland AT mesutpolatgil theuseofdifferentcriteriaweightingandmulticriteriadecisionmakingmethodsforuniversityrankingtwolayercopeland AT abdulkerimguler useofdifferentcriteriaweightingandmulticriteriadecisionmakingmethodsforuniversityrankingtwolayercopeland AT mesutpolatgil useofdifferentcriteriaweightingandmulticriteriadecisionmakingmethodsforuniversityrankingtwolayercopeland |