Beamline and Flight Comparisons of the ARMAS Flight Module With the Tissue Equivalent Proportional Counter for Improving Atmospheric Radiation Monitoring Accuracy
Abstract Ionizing radiation at aircraft and commercial suborbital spaceflight altitudes is driven by space weather and is a health concern for crew and passengers. We compare the response functions of two radiation detectors that were exposed to four different ground‐based laboratory radiation field...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2020-12-01
|
| Series: | Space Weather |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1029/2020SW002599 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841536307237486592 |
|---|---|
| author | Brad “Buddy” Gersey W. Kent Tobiska William Atwell Dave Bouwer Leonid Didkovsky Kevin Judge Seth Wieman Richard Wilkins |
| author_facet | Brad “Buddy” Gersey W. Kent Tobiska William Atwell Dave Bouwer Leonid Didkovsky Kevin Judge Seth Wieman Richard Wilkins |
| author_sort | Brad “Buddy” Gersey |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Ionizing radiation at aircraft and commercial suborbital spaceflight altitudes is driven by space weather and is a health concern for crew and passengers. We compare the response functions of two radiation detectors that were exposed to four different ground‐based laboratory radiation fields as well as flown alongside each other on aircraft. The detectors were a tissue equivalent proportional counter (TEPC) and a Teledyne silicon micro dosimeter chip that was integrated into an Automated Radiation Measurements for Aerospace Safety Flight Module (ARMAS FM). Both detectors were flown onboard commercial and research aircraft. In addition, both detectors were exposed neutrons at the Los Alamos Neutron Science Center, protons at Loma Linda University Medical Center, 56Fe particles at the NASA Space Radiation Laboratory, and also a gamma radiation source at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The response of each of these instruments as well as derived dosimetric quantities are compared for each radiation exposure and the ratio for converting ARMAS absorbed dose in silicon to an estimated absorbed dose in tissue is obtained. This process resulted in the first definitive calibration of the silicon‐based detector like ARMAS to TEPC. In particular, with seven flights of both instruments together, the ARMAS‐derived dose in tissue was then validated with the TEPC‐measured dose in tissue and these results are reported. This work provides a method for significantly improving the accuracy of radiation measurements relevant to human tissue safety using a silicon detector that is easy to deploy and can report data in real time. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-16850d40b0f34b2db493c160fc3403e3 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1542-7390 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2020-12-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Space Weather |
| spelling | doaj-art-16850d40b0f34b2db493c160fc3403e32025-01-14T16:35:25ZengWileySpace Weather1542-73902020-12-011812n/an/a10.1029/2020SW002599Beamline and Flight Comparisons of the ARMAS Flight Module With the Tissue Equivalent Proportional Counter for Improving Atmospheric Radiation Monitoring AccuracyBrad “Buddy” Gersey0W. Kent Tobiska1William Atwell2Dave Bouwer3Leonid Didkovsky4Kevin Judge5Seth Wieman6Richard Wilkins7Space Weather Division Space Environment Technologies Los Angeles CA USASpace Weather Division Space Environment Technologies Los Angeles CA USASpace Weather Division Space Environment Technologies Los Angeles CA USASpace Weather Division Space Environment Technologies Los Angeles CA USASpace Weather Division Space Environment Technologies Los Angeles CA USASpace Weather Division Space Environment Technologies Los Angeles CA USASpace Weather Division Space Environment Technologies Los Angeles CA USADepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering Prairie View A&M University Prairie View TX USAAbstract Ionizing radiation at aircraft and commercial suborbital spaceflight altitudes is driven by space weather and is a health concern for crew and passengers. We compare the response functions of two radiation detectors that were exposed to four different ground‐based laboratory radiation fields as well as flown alongside each other on aircraft. The detectors were a tissue equivalent proportional counter (TEPC) and a Teledyne silicon micro dosimeter chip that was integrated into an Automated Radiation Measurements for Aerospace Safety Flight Module (ARMAS FM). Both detectors were flown onboard commercial and research aircraft. In addition, both detectors were exposed neutrons at the Los Alamos Neutron Science Center, protons at Loma Linda University Medical Center, 56Fe particles at the NASA Space Radiation Laboratory, and also a gamma radiation source at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The response of each of these instruments as well as derived dosimetric quantities are compared for each radiation exposure and the ratio for converting ARMAS absorbed dose in silicon to an estimated absorbed dose in tissue is obtained. This process resulted in the first definitive calibration of the silicon‐based detector like ARMAS to TEPC. In particular, with seven flights of both instruments together, the ARMAS‐derived dose in tissue was then validated with the TEPC‐measured dose in tissue and these results are reported. This work provides a method for significantly improving the accuracy of radiation measurements relevant to human tissue safety using a silicon detector that is easy to deploy and can report data in real time.https://doi.org/10.1029/2020SW002599ARMASTEPCatmospheric radiationcalibrationvalidationregulatory monitoring |
| spellingShingle | Brad “Buddy” Gersey W. Kent Tobiska William Atwell Dave Bouwer Leonid Didkovsky Kevin Judge Seth Wieman Richard Wilkins Beamline and Flight Comparisons of the ARMAS Flight Module With the Tissue Equivalent Proportional Counter for Improving Atmospheric Radiation Monitoring Accuracy Space Weather ARMAS TEPC atmospheric radiation calibration validation regulatory monitoring |
| title | Beamline and Flight Comparisons of the ARMAS Flight Module With the Tissue Equivalent Proportional Counter for Improving Atmospheric Radiation Monitoring Accuracy |
| title_full | Beamline and Flight Comparisons of the ARMAS Flight Module With the Tissue Equivalent Proportional Counter for Improving Atmospheric Radiation Monitoring Accuracy |
| title_fullStr | Beamline and Flight Comparisons of the ARMAS Flight Module With the Tissue Equivalent Proportional Counter for Improving Atmospheric Radiation Monitoring Accuracy |
| title_full_unstemmed | Beamline and Flight Comparisons of the ARMAS Flight Module With the Tissue Equivalent Proportional Counter for Improving Atmospheric Radiation Monitoring Accuracy |
| title_short | Beamline and Flight Comparisons of the ARMAS Flight Module With the Tissue Equivalent Proportional Counter for Improving Atmospheric Radiation Monitoring Accuracy |
| title_sort | beamline and flight comparisons of the armas flight module with the tissue equivalent proportional counter for improving atmospheric radiation monitoring accuracy |
| topic | ARMAS TEPC atmospheric radiation calibration validation regulatory monitoring |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1029/2020SW002599 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT bradbuddygersey beamlineandflightcomparisonsofthearmasflightmodulewiththetissueequivalentproportionalcounterforimprovingatmosphericradiationmonitoringaccuracy AT wkenttobiska beamlineandflightcomparisonsofthearmasflightmodulewiththetissueequivalentproportionalcounterforimprovingatmosphericradiationmonitoringaccuracy AT williamatwell beamlineandflightcomparisonsofthearmasflightmodulewiththetissueequivalentproportionalcounterforimprovingatmosphericradiationmonitoringaccuracy AT davebouwer beamlineandflightcomparisonsofthearmasflightmodulewiththetissueequivalentproportionalcounterforimprovingatmosphericradiationmonitoringaccuracy AT leoniddidkovsky beamlineandflightcomparisonsofthearmasflightmodulewiththetissueequivalentproportionalcounterforimprovingatmosphericradiationmonitoringaccuracy AT kevinjudge beamlineandflightcomparisonsofthearmasflightmodulewiththetissueequivalentproportionalcounterforimprovingatmosphericradiationmonitoringaccuracy AT sethwieman beamlineandflightcomparisonsofthearmasflightmodulewiththetissueequivalentproportionalcounterforimprovingatmosphericradiationmonitoringaccuracy AT richardwilkins beamlineandflightcomparisonsofthearmasflightmodulewiththetissueequivalentproportionalcounterforimprovingatmosphericradiationmonitoringaccuracy |