Analysis of the project success factor through time, cost, labour, health, safety, environment and quality aspects at PT XYZ
This study aims to analyze the failure factors of PT. XYZ in 2018 – 2020 in terms of time, cost, labor, Health, Safety, and Environment (HSE), and quality based on the Success Project Factor (SPF). It includes 183 projects with the Non-Probability Sampling technique. The researcher uses fishbone and...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universitat Politècnica de València
2022-01-01
|
| Series: | International Journal of Production Management and Engineering |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://polipapers.upv.es/index.php/IJPME/article/view/16021 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1846146871500734464 |
|---|---|
| author | Moh Komarudin Rosalendro Eddy Nugroho |
| author_facet | Moh Komarudin Rosalendro Eddy Nugroho |
| author_sort | Moh Komarudin |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This study aims to analyze the failure factors of PT. XYZ in 2018 – 2020 in terms of time, cost, labor, Health, Safety, and Environment (HSE), and quality based on the Success Project Factor (SPF). It includes 183 projects with the Non-Probability Sampling technique. The researcher uses fishbone and Pareto to identify problems. The results showed Schedule Performance Index (SPI) 1 indicated the project is in the late category, the Cost Performance Index (CPI) 1 indicated cost overrun, Safety Performance Index (SFPI) 0 indicated the K3 target could not be reached, the Client Satisfaction Index (CSI) = 34.03, indicated that it is in the dissatisfied category, then Productivity Coefficient Plan Realization, it meant the workforce was less productive. After the analysis of fishbone and Pareto, the data show that the highest cause was 13% due to lack of supervision, project cost aspects were 13% due to delays, HSE project aspect were 13% due to no K3 process before work begins, the quality aspect was 17% due to no training, and the labor aspect was 17% due to poor worker discipline. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-16829e681ad249a7bb943a36d897f04a |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2340-4876 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2022-01-01 |
| publisher | Universitat Politècnica de València |
| record_format | Article |
| series | International Journal of Production Management and Engineering |
| spelling | doaj-art-16829e681ad249a7bb943a36d897f04a2024-12-02T00:43:52ZengUniversitat Politècnica de ValènciaInternational Journal of Production Management and Engineering2340-48762022-01-01101335010.4995/ijpme.2022.160219231Analysis of the project success factor through time, cost, labour, health, safety, environment and quality aspects at PT XYZMoh Komarudin0Rosalendro Eddy Nugroho1Universitas MercubuanaUniversitas MercubuanaThis study aims to analyze the failure factors of PT. XYZ in 2018 – 2020 in terms of time, cost, labor, Health, Safety, and Environment (HSE), and quality based on the Success Project Factor (SPF). It includes 183 projects with the Non-Probability Sampling technique. The researcher uses fishbone and Pareto to identify problems. The results showed Schedule Performance Index (SPI) 1 indicated the project is in the late category, the Cost Performance Index (CPI) 1 indicated cost overrun, Safety Performance Index (SFPI) 0 indicated the K3 target could not be reached, the Client Satisfaction Index (CSI) = 34.03, indicated that it is in the dissatisfied category, then Productivity Coefficient Plan Realization, it meant the workforce was less productive. After the analysis of fishbone and Pareto, the data show that the highest cause was 13% due to lack of supervision, project cost aspects were 13% due to delays, HSE project aspect were 13% due to no K3 process before work begins, the quality aspect was 17% due to no training, and the labor aspect was 17% due to poor worker discipline.https://polipapers.upv.es/index.php/IJPME/article/view/16021success project factorschedule performancecost performancesafety performanceproductivity coefficientclient satisfaction |
| spellingShingle | Moh Komarudin Rosalendro Eddy Nugroho Analysis of the project success factor through time, cost, labour, health, safety, environment and quality aspects at PT XYZ International Journal of Production Management and Engineering success project factor schedule performance cost performance safety performance productivity coefficient client satisfaction |
| title | Analysis of the project success factor through time, cost, labour, health, safety, environment and quality aspects at PT XYZ |
| title_full | Analysis of the project success factor through time, cost, labour, health, safety, environment and quality aspects at PT XYZ |
| title_fullStr | Analysis of the project success factor through time, cost, labour, health, safety, environment and quality aspects at PT XYZ |
| title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of the project success factor through time, cost, labour, health, safety, environment and quality aspects at PT XYZ |
| title_short | Analysis of the project success factor through time, cost, labour, health, safety, environment and quality aspects at PT XYZ |
| title_sort | analysis of the project success factor through time cost labour health safety environment and quality aspects at pt xyz |
| topic | success project factor schedule performance cost performance safety performance productivity coefficient client satisfaction |
| url | https://polipapers.upv.es/index.php/IJPME/article/view/16021 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mohkomarudin analysisoftheprojectsuccessfactorthroughtimecostlabourhealthsafetyenvironmentandqualityaspectsatptxyz AT rosalendroeddynugroho analysisoftheprojectsuccessfactorthroughtimecostlabourhealthsafetyenvironmentandqualityaspectsatptxyz |