Comparison of diagnostic performance for pulmonary nodule detection between free-breathing spiral ultrashort echo time and free-breathing radial volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination

Abstract Objective This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of two free-breathing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences—spiral ultrashort echo time (spiral UTE) and radial volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (radial VIBE). Methods Patients were prospectively enrolled between Februar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yehai Jiang, Doudou Pu, Xuyang Zhang, Zhanli Ren, Nan Yu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-01-01
Series:BMC Medical Imaging
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-024-01536-6
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Objective This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of two free-breathing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences—spiral ultrashort echo time (spiral UTE) and radial volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (radial VIBE). Methods Patients were prospectively enrolled between February 2021 and September 2022. All participants underwent both 3T MRI scanning, utilizing the radial VIBE sequence and spiral UTE sequence, as well as standard chest CT imaging. The CT and MRI examinations were conducted within a 7-day interval. Two radiologists assessed the image quality using a visual 5-point ordinal Likert scale, and pulmonary nodules identified on MRI were evaluated through comparison with CT as the reference standard. Results A total of 52 patients participated in this study, during which 82 pulmonary nodules were detected via CT imaging. The image quality scores for depicting pulmonary vasculature and airways using the spiral UTE sequence (4.61 ± 0.63; 4.76 ± 0.48) were significantly higher than those for the radial VIBE sequence (4.27 ± 0.87; 4.14 ± 0.82) (P < 0.05). However, for nodules smaller than 6 mm, the detection rate for the spiral UTE sequence (82.61%) was notably higher than that of the radial VIBE sequence (39.13%) (P < 0.05). Additionally, the detection rate for ground-glass nodules was higher with the spiral UTE sequence (75.00%) compared to the radial VIBE sequence (17.86%) (P < 0.05). The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) between radial VIBE and CT was 0.99 (P < 0.001), and the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) between spiral UTE and CT was also 0.99 (P < 0.001). Conclusion The spiral UTE sequence demonstrates superior capability in visualizing ground glass nodules, blood vessels, and airways. In cases where patients present with ground glass nodules, the spiral UTE sequence is the preferred choice. Conversely, when the nodules are solid or partially solid, it is advisable to opt for radial VIBE sequences that are time-efficient and exhibit fewer artifacts.
ISSN:1471-2342