Comparison of a Neutral Density Model With the SET HASDM Density Database

Abstract The EXospheric TEMperatures on a PoLyhedrAl gRid (EXTEMPLAR) method predicts the neutral densities in the thermosphere. The performance of this model has been evaluated through a comparison with the Air Force High Accuracy Satellite Drag Model (HASDM). The Space Environment Technologies (SE...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel R. Weimer, W. Kent Tobiska, Piyush M. Mehta, R. J. Licata, Douglas P. Drob, Jean Yoshii
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-12-01
Series:Space Weather
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2021SW002888
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841536384766050304
author Daniel R. Weimer
W. Kent Tobiska
Piyush M. Mehta
R. J. Licata
Douglas P. Drob
Jean Yoshii
author_facet Daniel R. Weimer
W. Kent Tobiska
Piyush M. Mehta
R. J. Licata
Douglas P. Drob
Jean Yoshii
author_sort Daniel R. Weimer
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The EXospheric TEMperatures on a PoLyhedrAl gRid (EXTEMPLAR) method predicts the neutral densities in the thermosphere. The performance of this model has been evaluated through a comparison with the Air Force High Accuracy Satellite Drag Model (HASDM). The Space Environment Technologies (SET) HASDM database that was used for this test spans the 20 years 2000 through 2019, containing densities at 3 hr time intervals at 25 km altitude steps, and a spatial resolution of 10° latitude by 15° longitude. The upgraded EXTEMPLAR that was tested uses the newer Naval Research Laboratory MSIS 2.0 model to convert global exospheric temperature values to neutral density as a function of altitude. The revision also incorporated time delays that varied as a function of location, between the total Poynting flux in the polar regions and the exospheric temperature response. The density values from both models were integrated on spherical shells at altitudes ranging from 200 to 800 km. These sums were compared as a function of time. The results show an excellent agreement at temporal scales ranging from hours to years. The EXTEMPLAR model performs best at altitudes of 400 km and above, where geomagnetic storms produce the largest relative changes in neutral density. In addition to providing an effective method to compare models that have very different spatial resolutions, the use of density totals at various altitudes presents a useful illustration of how the thermosphere behaves at different altitudes, on time scales ranging from hours to complete solar cycles.
format Article
id doaj-art-161f3f1414b84154b4ca57a4a571ef4f
institution Kabale University
issn 1542-7390
language English
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Space Weather
spelling doaj-art-161f3f1414b84154b4ca57a4a571ef4f2025-01-14T16:27:22ZengWileySpace Weather1542-73902021-12-011912n/an/a10.1029/2021SW002888Comparison of a Neutral Density Model With the SET HASDM Density DatabaseDaniel R. Weimer0W. Kent Tobiska1Piyush M. Mehta2R. J. Licata3Douglas P. Drob4Jean Yoshii5Center for Space Science and Engineering Research Virginia Tech Blacksburg VA USASpace Environment Technologies Los Angeles CA USADepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Statler College of Engineering and Mineral Resources West Virginia University Morgantown WV USADepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Statler College of Engineering and Mineral Resources West Virginia University Morgantown WV USASpace Science Division U.S. Naval Research Laboratory Washington DC USASpace Environment Technologies Los Angeles CA USAAbstract The EXospheric TEMperatures on a PoLyhedrAl gRid (EXTEMPLAR) method predicts the neutral densities in the thermosphere. The performance of this model has been evaluated through a comparison with the Air Force High Accuracy Satellite Drag Model (HASDM). The Space Environment Technologies (SET) HASDM database that was used for this test spans the 20 years 2000 through 2019, containing densities at 3 hr time intervals at 25 km altitude steps, and a spatial resolution of 10° latitude by 15° longitude. The upgraded EXTEMPLAR that was tested uses the newer Naval Research Laboratory MSIS 2.0 model to convert global exospheric temperature values to neutral density as a function of altitude. The revision also incorporated time delays that varied as a function of location, between the total Poynting flux in the polar regions and the exospheric temperature response. The density values from both models were integrated on spherical shells at altitudes ranging from 200 to 800 km. These sums were compared as a function of time. The results show an excellent agreement at temporal scales ranging from hours to years. The EXTEMPLAR model performs best at altitudes of 400 km and above, where geomagnetic storms produce the largest relative changes in neutral density. In addition to providing an effective method to compare models that have very different spatial resolutions, the use of density totals at various altitudes presents a useful illustration of how the thermosphere behaves at different altitudes, on time scales ranging from hours to complete solar cycles.https://doi.org/10.1029/2021SW002888space weatherthermospheremodelsforecastingsatellite drag
spellingShingle Daniel R. Weimer
W. Kent Tobiska
Piyush M. Mehta
R. J. Licata
Douglas P. Drob
Jean Yoshii
Comparison of a Neutral Density Model With the SET HASDM Density Database
Space Weather
space weather
thermosphere
models
forecasting
satellite drag
title Comparison of a Neutral Density Model With the SET HASDM Density Database
title_full Comparison of a Neutral Density Model With the SET HASDM Density Database
title_fullStr Comparison of a Neutral Density Model With the SET HASDM Density Database
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of a Neutral Density Model With the SET HASDM Density Database
title_short Comparison of a Neutral Density Model With the SET HASDM Density Database
title_sort comparison of a neutral density model with the set hasdm density database
topic space weather
thermosphere
models
forecasting
satellite drag
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2021SW002888
work_keys_str_mv AT danielrweimer comparisonofaneutraldensitymodelwiththesethasdmdensitydatabase
AT wkenttobiska comparisonofaneutraldensitymodelwiththesethasdmdensitydatabase
AT piyushmmehta comparisonofaneutraldensitymodelwiththesethasdmdensitydatabase
AT rjlicata comparisonofaneutraldensitymodelwiththesethasdmdensitydatabase
AT douglaspdrob comparisonofaneutraldensitymodelwiththesethasdmdensitydatabase
AT jeanyoshii comparisonofaneutraldensitymodelwiththesethasdmdensitydatabase