Evaluation of Mandibular Buccal Shelf Area for Mini Screw Placement in Different Sagittal and Vertical Skeletal Pattern: A CBCT Study
Background: The continuous evolution in orthodontics introduces innovative materials and methods to enhance treatment efficacy. Among these advancements, orthodontic anchorage screws, particularly miniscrews, have revolutionized treatments by offering diverse nonsurgical solutions for managing space...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_669_24 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841543441306091520 |
|---|---|
| author | A Abhijith Anshu Sahu Raghu Ranjan Shovan Roy Parul Priya Monalisa Goswami |
| author_facet | A Abhijith Anshu Sahu Raghu Ranjan Shovan Roy Parul Priya Monalisa Goswami |
| author_sort | A Abhijith |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background:
The continuous evolution in orthodontics introduces innovative materials and methods to enhance treatment efficacy. Among these advancements, orthodontic anchorage screws, particularly miniscrews, have revolutionized treatments by offering diverse nonsurgical solutions for managing space discrepancies and certain skeletal malocclusions. The success of miniscrews is influenced by various factors including patient-related factors (age, sex, skeletal pattern, and oral hygiene), miniscrew-related factors (diameter, length, shape), and treatment-related factors (technique, applied forces, and insertion site).
Materials and Methods:
This study used Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) to evaluate the mandibular buccal shelf area for miniscrew placement across different sagittal and vertical skeletal patterns in 63 subjects, categorized based on the ANB angle and Jarabak ratio into Class I, II, III, and horizontal, average, and vertical growth patterns, respectively. Measurements were taken at specific sites related to the mandibular first and second molars, focusing on angulation, buccal bone depth (4mm and 6mm from the cementoenamel junction), and buccal bone thickness (6mm and 11mm from the cementoenamel junction).
Results:
There were no significant statistical differences in any measurement between the right and left hemiarches. The values for the bone around the distal root of the mandibular second molar were significantly greater than the other values. With regard to Sagittal Skeletal Pattern, Class I cases showed greater values as compared to Class II and Class III with a significant difference in the angulation, bone depth, and thickness at 11 mm from CEJ. Although values tended to be greater in patients with horizontal growth pattern, the difference was not statistically significant.
Conclusion:
Mandibular buccal shelf provides an optimal bone site for miniscrew insertion with better osseous characteristics at the distal root of the mandibular second molar. Subjects with skeletal Class I and horizontal growth pattern exhibit the most favorable osseous characteristics in the MBS area. However, in terms of bone thickness at 6 mm from CEJ Class III cases showed significant difference compared to Class I and Class II. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-15fa8672fb1e49df89c4156fb1a0cefb |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 0976-4879 0975-7406 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences |
| spelling | doaj-art-15fa8672fb1e49df89c4156fb1a0cefb2025-01-13T10:43:12ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences0976-48790975-74062024-12-0116Suppl 4S3986S399110.4103/jpbs.jpbs_669_24Evaluation of Mandibular Buccal Shelf Area for Mini Screw Placement in Different Sagittal and Vertical Skeletal Pattern: A CBCT StudyA AbhijithAnshu SahuRaghu RanjanShovan RoyParul PriyaMonalisa GoswamiBackground: The continuous evolution in orthodontics introduces innovative materials and methods to enhance treatment efficacy. Among these advancements, orthodontic anchorage screws, particularly miniscrews, have revolutionized treatments by offering diverse nonsurgical solutions for managing space discrepancies and certain skeletal malocclusions. The success of miniscrews is influenced by various factors including patient-related factors (age, sex, skeletal pattern, and oral hygiene), miniscrew-related factors (diameter, length, shape), and treatment-related factors (technique, applied forces, and insertion site). Materials and Methods: This study used Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) to evaluate the mandibular buccal shelf area for miniscrew placement across different sagittal and vertical skeletal patterns in 63 subjects, categorized based on the ANB angle and Jarabak ratio into Class I, II, III, and horizontal, average, and vertical growth patterns, respectively. Measurements were taken at specific sites related to the mandibular first and second molars, focusing on angulation, buccal bone depth (4mm and 6mm from the cementoenamel junction), and buccal bone thickness (6mm and 11mm from the cementoenamel junction). Results: There were no significant statistical differences in any measurement between the right and left hemiarches. The values for the bone around the distal root of the mandibular second molar were significantly greater than the other values. With regard to Sagittal Skeletal Pattern, Class I cases showed greater values as compared to Class II and Class III with a significant difference in the angulation, bone depth, and thickness at 11 mm from CEJ. Although values tended to be greater in patients with horizontal growth pattern, the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Mandibular buccal shelf provides an optimal bone site for miniscrew insertion with better osseous characteristics at the distal root of the mandibular second molar. Subjects with skeletal Class I and horizontal growth pattern exhibit the most favorable osseous characteristics in the MBS area. However, in terms of bone thickness at 6 mm from CEJ Class III cases showed significant difference compared to Class I and Class II.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_669_24anchoragebone thicknesscbctmandibular buccal shelfminiscrewsorthodonticsskeletal patterns |
| spellingShingle | A Abhijith Anshu Sahu Raghu Ranjan Shovan Roy Parul Priya Monalisa Goswami Evaluation of Mandibular Buccal Shelf Area for Mini Screw Placement in Different Sagittal and Vertical Skeletal Pattern: A CBCT Study Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences anchorage bone thickness cbct mandibular buccal shelf miniscrews orthodontics skeletal patterns |
| title | Evaluation of Mandibular Buccal Shelf Area for Mini Screw Placement in Different Sagittal and Vertical Skeletal Pattern: A CBCT Study |
| title_full | Evaluation of Mandibular Buccal Shelf Area for Mini Screw Placement in Different Sagittal and Vertical Skeletal Pattern: A CBCT Study |
| title_fullStr | Evaluation of Mandibular Buccal Shelf Area for Mini Screw Placement in Different Sagittal and Vertical Skeletal Pattern: A CBCT Study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Mandibular Buccal Shelf Area for Mini Screw Placement in Different Sagittal and Vertical Skeletal Pattern: A CBCT Study |
| title_short | Evaluation of Mandibular Buccal Shelf Area for Mini Screw Placement in Different Sagittal and Vertical Skeletal Pattern: A CBCT Study |
| title_sort | evaluation of mandibular buccal shelf area for mini screw placement in different sagittal and vertical skeletal pattern a cbct study |
| topic | anchorage bone thickness cbct mandibular buccal shelf miniscrews orthodontics skeletal patterns |
| url | https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_669_24 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT aabhijith evaluationofmandibularbuccalshelfareaforminiscrewplacementindifferentsagittalandverticalskeletalpatternacbctstudy AT anshusahu evaluationofmandibularbuccalshelfareaforminiscrewplacementindifferentsagittalandverticalskeletalpatternacbctstudy AT raghuranjan evaluationofmandibularbuccalshelfareaforminiscrewplacementindifferentsagittalandverticalskeletalpatternacbctstudy AT shovanroy evaluationofmandibularbuccalshelfareaforminiscrewplacementindifferentsagittalandverticalskeletalpatternacbctstudy AT parulpriya evaluationofmandibularbuccalshelfareaforminiscrewplacementindifferentsagittalandverticalskeletalpatternacbctstudy AT monalisagoswami evaluationofmandibularbuccalshelfareaforminiscrewplacementindifferentsagittalandverticalskeletalpatternacbctstudy |