Ultimate tensile strength and microhardness of glass ionomer materials

Objective: This study evaluated the ultimate tensile strength (UTS) and microhardness (µKH) of conventional (CO) and hybrid resin-modified glass ionomer (RM). Material and methods: Nine specimens to UTS and twelve for µKHN of glass ionomer materials were obtained using special molds. The materials...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paula Roberta Perondi, Pedro Henrique Cabral Oliveira, Alessandra Cassoni, André Figueiredo Reis, José Augusto Rodrigues
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Estadual Paulista 2014-01-01
Series:Brazilian Dental Science
Online Access:https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/949
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849228631879974912
author Paula Roberta Perondi
Pedro Henrique Cabral Oliveira
Alessandra Cassoni
André Figueiredo Reis
José Augusto Rodrigues
author_facet Paula Roberta Perondi
Pedro Henrique Cabral Oliveira
Alessandra Cassoni
André Figueiredo Reis
José Augusto Rodrigues
author_sort Paula Roberta Perondi
collection DOAJ
description Objective: This study evaluated the ultimate tensile strength (UTS) and microhardness (µKH) of conventional (CO) and hybrid resin-modified glass ionomer (RM). Material and methods: Nine specimens to UTS and twelve for µKHN of glass ionomer materials were obtained using special molds. The materials were manipulated and CO groups were allowed to self-cure for five minutes and RM were subjected to light-activation as indicated by manufactures through a glass slide. All specimens were dark-stored in 100% relative humidity for 24h. For UTS test, specimens were tested in tension in a universal testing machine (crosshead speed of 1 mm/min) until failure. For µKHN test a Knoop diamond indenter was used to make five indentations in the upper/light irradiated surface of the specimens. UTS and µKHN data were submitted to one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s test (?= 5%).  Results: The results for UTS were: Ionomaster: 7.0 (±1.6)A; Maxxion R: 8.8 (±3.7)A Vidrion R: 8.8 (±3.9)A; ChemFil Rock: 10.7 (±4.6)AB; Vitremer: 13.1 (±3.3)BC; Vitrofil R: 14.9 (±7.8)CD; Ionoseal: 14.5 (±8.2)CD; Resiglass: 16.3 (±2.3)D. The results for µKH: Ionomaster: 24.3 (±6.6)B; Maxxion R: 17.7 (±4.7)A, Vidrion R: 31.0 (±9.4) B; ChemFil Rock: 31.1 (±8.5)B; Vitremer: 20.3 (±3.3)A; Vitrofil R: 16.5 (±5.1)A; Ionoseal: 13.1 (±8.5)A; Resiglass: 21.6 (±5.2)A. Conclusion: It was observed that the hybrid resin-modified ionomers generally have higher cohesive strength than conventional ones, but lower microhardness.
format Article
id doaj-art-15f35e7fe501417f8f3f7047a64b81f1
institution Kabale University
issn 2178-6011
language English
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Universidade Estadual Paulista
record_format Article
series Brazilian Dental Science
spelling doaj-art-15f35e7fe501417f8f3f7047a64b81f12025-08-22T17:55:03ZengUniversidade Estadual PaulistaBrazilian Dental Science2178-60112014-01-0117110.14295/bds.2014.v17i1.949Ultimate tensile strength and microhardness of glass ionomer materialsPaula Roberta Perondi0Pedro Henrique Cabral Oliveira1Alessandra Cassoni2André Figueiredo Reis3José Augusto Rodrigues4M.Sc., Camilo Castelo Branco University - Department of Restorative Dentistry. Carolina Fonseca, 584 São Paulo – SP, Brazil - CEP: 08230-030, Phone (Fax): 55(11) 2070-0000M.Sc. student, Guarulhos University – UnG, Department of Restorative Dentistry - Dental Research Division. Praça Teresa Cristina, 229, Centro - Guarulhos - SP, Brazil - CEP 07023-070, Phone (Fax): 55(11) 2087-3594Ph.D., Guarulhos University – UnG, Department of Restorative Dentistry - Dental Research Division. Praça Teresa Cristina, 229, Centro - Guarulhos - SP, Brazil - CEP 07023-070, Phone (Fax): 55(11) 2087-3594Ph.D., Guarulhos University – UnG, Department of Restorative Dentistry - Dental Research Division. Praça Teresa Cristina, 229, Centro - Guarulhos - SP, Brazil - CEP 07023-070, Phone (Fax): 55(11) 2087-3594Ph.D., Guarulhos University – UnG, Department of Restorative Dentistry - Dental Research Division. Praça Teresa Cristina, 229, Centro - Guarulhos - SP, Brazil - CEP 07023-070, Phone (Fax): 55(11) 2087-3594 Objective: This study evaluated the ultimate tensile strength (UTS) and microhardness (µKH) of conventional (CO) and hybrid resin-modified glass ionomer (RM). Material and methods: Nine specimens to UTS and twelve for µKHN of glass ionomer materials were obtained using special molds. The materials were manipulated and CO groups were allowed to self-cure for five minutes and RM were subjected to light-activation as indicated by manufactures through a glass slide. All specimens were dark-stored in 100% relative humidity for 24h. For UTS test, specimens were tested in tension in a universal testing machine (crosshead speed of 1 mm/min) until failure. For µKHN test a Knoop diamond indenter was used to make five indentations in the upper/light irradiated surface of the specimens. UTS and µKHN data were submitted to one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s test (?= 5%).  Results: The results for UTS were: Ionomaster: 7.0 (±1.6)A; Maxxion R: 8.8 (±3.7)A Vidrion R: 8.8 (±3.9)A; ChemFil Rock: 10.7 (±4.6)AB; Vitremer: 13.1 (±3.3)BC; Vitrofil R: 14.9 (±7.8)CD; Ionoseal: 14.5 (±8.2)CD; Resiglass: 16.3 (±2.3)D. The results for µKH: Ionomaster: 24.3 (±6.6)B; Maxxion R: 17.7 (±4.7)A, Vidrion R: 31.0 (±9.4) B; ChemFil Rock: 31.1 (±8.5)B; Vitremer: 20.3 (±3.3)A; Vitrofil R: 16.5 (±5.1)A; Ionoseal: 13.1 (±8.5)A; Resiglass: 21.6 (±5.2)A. Conclusion: It was observed that the hybrid resin-modified ionomers generally have higher cohesive strength than conventional ones, but lower microhardness. https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/949
spellingShingle Paula Roberta Perondi
Pedro Henrique Cabral Oliveira
Alessandra Cassoni
André Figueiredo Reis
José Augusto Rodrigues
Ultimate tensile strength and microhardness of glass ionomer materials
Brazilian Dental Science
title Ultimate tensile strength and microhardness of glass ionomer materials
title_full Ultimate tensile strength and microhardness of glass ionomer materials
title_fullStr Ultimate tensile strength and microhardness of glass ionomer materials
title_full_unstemmed Ultimate tensile strength and microhardness of glass ionomer materials
title_short Ultimate tensile strength and microhardness of glass ionomer materials
title_sort ultimate tensile strength and microhardness of glass ionomer materials
url https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/949
work_keys_str_mv AT paularobertaperondi ultimatetensilestrengthandmicrohardnessofglassionomermaterials
AT pedrohenriquecabraloliveira ultimatetensilestrengthandmicrohardnessofglassionomermaterials
AT alessandracassoni ultimatetensilestrengthandmicrohardnessofglassionomermaterials
AT andrefigueiredoreis ultimatetensilestrengthandmicrohardnessofglassionomermaterials
AT joseaugustorodrigues ultimatetensilestrengthandmicrohardnessofglassionomermaterials