Exploring Motor Recovery Differences in Paretic Upper and Lower Extremity after Stroke: A Cross-sectional Analytical Study

Introduction: Stroke globally cause permanent disability, often impairing upper and lower limb function. Poststroke rehabilitation focuses on enhancing functional outcomes, but limb recovery differs and has various contributing factors. Understanding these differences and their clinical and demograp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rathinasabapathy Sampath Pulimoot, CKV Bhuvaneswari, Annadurai Kabilan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited 2025-01-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.jcdr.net/articles/PDF/20431/75309_CE(Ra1)_F(Sh)_QC(PS_OM)_PF1(AG_IS)_PFA(IS)_PN(IS).pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841556210034147328
author Rathinasabapathy Sampath Pulimoot
CKV Bhuvaneswari
Annadurai Kabilan
author_facet Rathinasabapathy Sampath Pulimoot
CKV Bhuvaneswari
Annadurai Kabilan
author_sort Rathinasabapathy Sampath Pulimoot
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Stroke globally cause permanent disability, often impairing upper and lower limb function. Poststroke rehabilitation focuses on enhancing functional outcomes, but limb recovery differs and has various contributing factors. Understanding these differences and their clinical and demographic relationships helps develop comprehensive or individualised rehabilitation plans for better outcomes. Aim: To compare the motor recovery of paretic upper and lower extremities in poststroke patients and analyse their relationship with demographic and clinical factors. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Physiotherapy, Government Medical College and Hospital, Annamalai Nagar, Chidambaram, Tamil Nadu, India. A total of 41 stroke participants were recruited through purposive sampling. The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) scale was used to evaluate both Upper Limb (FMA-UL) and Lower Limb (FMA-LL) motor recovery. Statistical tools such as t-tests and Chi-square tests were used for data analysis. Results: The mean age of the participants was 52.15±13.51 years, with a mean stroke duration of 21.17±16.96 months. Most participants were males (63.41%) with right-sided involvement (75.6%), and the most common subtype was ischaemic stroke (78%). The mean FMA-LL score was 23.88±5.13 (70.2%), which was significantly higher than the FMA-UL mean score of 28.07±11.13 (42.5%), indicating better motor recovery in the lower extremity. Most patients had moderate to severe strokes, with 14.6% experiencing very severe impairment. Gender differences were statistically significant for lower-limb recovery (p-value =0.024), with males showing a mean score of 24.73±5.59, indicating greater recovery. Differences in stroke type were also statistically significant for lower-limb recovery (p-value <0.001), with ischaemic stroke patients having a mean score of 25.50±3.90, demonstrating greater improvements. No significant relationship was observed between age and duration of stroke with recovery patterns. Conclusion: Lower extremity demonstrated better motor recovery than upper extremity in poststroke patients. Ischaemic and male stroke subjects showed better lower extremity recovery than haemorrhagic and female stroke survivors respectively. The results indicate the implications for customised therapeutic plans in poststroke rehabilitation.
format Article
id doaj-art-151e5c1d1ba54cdb8bc955ba6d1bd38c
institution Kabale University
issn 2249-782X
0973-709X
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
spelling doaj-art-151e5c1d1ba54cdb8bc955ba6d1bd38c2025-01-07T12:10:00ZengJCDR Research and Publications Private LimitedJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research2249-782X0973-709X2025-01-011901010510.7860/JCDR/2025/75309.20431Exploring Motor Recovery Differences in Paretic Upper and Lower Extremity after Stroke: A Cross-sectional Analytical StudyRathinasabapathy Sampath Pulimoot0CKV Bhuvaneswari1Annadurai Kabilan2Lecturer, Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Government Cuddalore Medical College (RMMCH), Annamalai University, Chidambaram, Tamil Nadu, India.Assistant Professor, Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Government Cuddalore Medical College (RMMCH), Annamalai University, Chidambaram, Tamil Nadu, India.Assistant Professor, Department of Public Health, The Apollo University, Chittoor, Andhra Pradesh, India.Introduction: Stroke globally cause permanent disability, often impairing upper and lower limb function. Poststroke rehabilitation focuses on enhancing functional outcomes, but limb recovery differs and has various contributing factors. Understanding these differences and their clinical and demographic relationships helps develop comprehensive or individualised rehabilitation plans for better outcomes. Aim: To compare the motor recovery of paretic upper and lower extremities in poststroke patients and analyse their relationship with demographic and clinical factors. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Physiotherapy, Government Medical College and Hospital, Annamalai Nagar, Chidambaram, Tamil Nadu, India. A total of 41 stroke participants were recruited through purposive sampling. The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) scale was used to evaluate both Upper Limb (FMA-UL) and Lower Limb (FMA-LL) motor recovery. Statistical tools such as t-tests and Chi-square tests were used for data analysis. Results: The mean age of the participants was 52.15±13.51 years, with a mean stroke duration of 21.17±16.96 months. Most participants were males (63.41%) with right-sided involvement (75.6%), and the most common subtype was ischaemic stroke (78%). The mean FMA-LL score was 23.88±5.13 (70.2%), which was significantly higher than the FMA-UL mean score of 28.07±11.13 (42.5%), indicating better motor recovery in the lower extremity. Most patients had moderate to severe strokes, with 14.6% experiencing very severe impairment. Gender differences were statistically significant for lower-limb recovery (p-value =0.024), with males showing a mean score of 24.73±5.59, indicating greater recovery. Differences in stroke type were also statistically significant for lower-limb recovery (p-value <0.001), with ischaemic stroke patients having a mean score of 25.50±3.90, demonstrating greater improvements. No significant relationship was observed between age and duration of stroke with recovery patterns. Conclusion: Lower extremity demonstrated better motor recovery than upper extremity in poststroke patients. Ischaemic and male stroke subjects showed better lower extremity recovery than haemorrhagic and female stroke survivors respectively. The results indicate the implications for customised therapeutic plans in poststroke rehabilitation.https://www.jcdr.net/articles/PDF/20431/75309_CE(Ra1)_F(Sh)_QC(PS_OM)_PF1(AG_IS)_PFA(IS)_PN(IS).pdfcerebral haemorrhagegender factorshemiplegiaischaemic stroketreatment outcome
spellingShingle Rathinasabapathy Sampath Pulimoot
CKV Bhuvaneswari
Annadurai Kabilan
Exploring Motor Recovery Differences in Paretic Upper and Lower Extremity after Stroke: A Cross-sectional Analytical Study
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
cerebral haemorrhage
gender factors
hemiplegia
ischaemic stroke
treatment outcome
title Exploring Motor Recovery Differences in Paretic Upper and Lower Extremity after Stroke: A Cross-sectional Analytical Study
title_full Exploring Motor Recovery Differences in Paretic Upper and Lower Extremity after Stroke: A Cross-sectional Analytical Study
title_fullStr Exploring Motor Recovery Differences in Paretic Upper and Lower Extremity after Stroke: A Cross-sectional Analytical Study
title_full_unstemmed Exploring Motor Recovery Differences in Paretic Upper and Lower Extremity after Stroke: A Cross-sectional Analytical Study
title_short Exploring Motor Recovery Differences in Paretic Upper and Lower Extremity after Stroke: A Cross-sectional Analytical Study
title_sort exploring motor recovery differences in paretic upper and lower extremity after stroke a cross sectional analytical study
topic cerebral haemorrhage
gender factors
hemiplegia
ischaemic stroke
treatment outcome
url https://www.jcdr.net/articles/PDF/20431/75309_CE(Ra1)_F(Sh)_QC(PS_OM)_PF1(AG_IS)_PFA(IS)_PN(IS).pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT rathinasabapathysampathpulimoot exploringmotorrecoverydifferencesinpareticupperandlowerextremityafterstrokeacrosssectionalanalyticalstudy
AT ckvbhuvaneswari exploringmotorrecoverydifferencesinpareticupperandlowerextremityafterstrokeacrosssectionalanalyticalstudy
AT annaduraikabilan exploringmotorrecoverydifferencesinpareticupperandlowerextremityafterstrokeacrosssectionalanalyticalstudy