Diagnostic Performance and Safety of Ultrasound‐Guided Core Needle Biopsy for Diagnosing Lymphoma: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

ABSTRACT Background Lymphoma arises from transformed lymphoid cells. Although surgical excision biopsy is the standard diagnostic tool for patients with lymphoma, image‐guided fine‐needle aspiration (FNA) or core needle biopsy (CNB) is considered an alternative diagnostic option. Objective To assess...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yongmin Kwon, Min Kyoung Lee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-01-01
Series:Cancer Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.70414
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841543389485465600
author Yongmin Kwon
Min Kyoung Lee
author_facet Yongmin Kwon
Min Kyoung Lee
author_sort Yongmin Kwon
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Background Lymphoma arises from transformed lymphoid cells. Although surgical excision biopsy is the standard diagnostic tool for patients with lymphoma, image‐guided fine‐needle aspiration (FNA) or core needle biopsy (CNB) is considered an alternative diagnostic option. Objective To assess the diagnostic accuracy and safety of ultrasound (US)‐guided core needle biopsy (CNB) in patients with lymphoma. Methods A systematic review and meta‐analysis were conducted. A literature search was performed up to January 1, 2024, using the Ovid‐MELIBE and EMBASE databases to identify studies focusing on US‐guided CNB in lymphoma patients. Relevant outcomes, including sensitivity, specificity, and complication rates, were extracted from the included studies. The Der‐Simonian‐Laird random‐effects model was applied to analyze the pooled data. Results The pooled sensitivity of US‐guided CNB in lymphoma patients was 94% (95% CI = 89%–96%), and the specificity was 100% (95% CI = 94%–100%). The pooled complication rate was 1% (95% CI = 0%–3%), with self‐limiting complications being the most common. Conclusion US‐guided CNB demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy and low complication rates in patients with lymphoma, supporting its use as an alternative diagnostic tool.
format Article
id doaj-art-14d55dd28fb042ddb1c2ce9cbb327a85
institution Kabale University
issn 2045-7634
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Cancer Medicine
spelling doaj-art-14d55dd28fb042ddb1c2ce9cbb327a852025-01-13T13:22:38ZengWileyCancer Medicine2045-76342025-01-01141n/an/a10.1002/cam4.70414Diagnostic Performance and Safety of Ultrasound‐Guided Core Needle Biopsy for Diagnosing Lymphoma: A Systematic Review and Meta‐AnalysisYongmin Kwon0Min Kyoung Lee1Department of Radiology, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine The Catholic University of Korea Seoul Republic of KoreaDepartment of Radiology, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine The Catholic University of Korea Seoul Republic of KoreaABSTRACT Background Lymphoma arises from transformed lymphoid cells. Although surgical excision biopsy is the standard diagnostic tool for patients with lymphoma, image‐guided fine‐needle aspiration (FNA) or core needle biopsy (CNB) is considered an alternative diagnostic option. Objective To assess the diagnostic accuracy and safety of ultrasound (US)‐guided core needle biopsy (CNB) in patients with lymphoma. Methods A systematic review and meta‐analysis were conducted. A literature search was performed up to January 1, 2024, using the Ovid‐MELIBE and EMBASE databases to identify studies focusing on US‐guided CNB in lymphoma patients. Relevant outcomes, including sensitivity, specificity, and complication rates, were extracted from the included studies. The Der‐Simonian‐Laird random‐effects model was applied to analyze the pooled data. Results The pooled sensitivity of US‐guided CNB in lymphoma patients was 94% (95% CI = 89%–96%), and the specificity was 100% (95% CI = 94%–100%). The pooled complication rate was 1% (95% CI = 0%–3%), with self‐limiting complications being the most common. Conclusion US‐guided CNB demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy and low complication rates in patients with lymphoma, supporting its use as an alternative diagnostic tool.https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.70414core needle biopsylymphomameta‐analysissystematic reviewultrasound
spellingShingle Yongmin Kwon
Min Kyoung Lee
Diagnostic Performance and Safety of Ultrasound‐Guided Core Needle Biopsy for Diagnosing Lymphoma: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
Cancer Medicine
core needle biopsy
lymphoma
meta‐analysis
systematic review
ultrasound
title Diagnostic Performance and Safety of Ultrasound‐Guided Core Needle Biopsy for Diagnosing Lymphoma: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_full Diagnostic Performance and Safety of Ultrasound‐Guided Core Needle Biopsy for Diagnosing Lymphoma: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_fullStr Diagnostic Performance and Safety of Ultrasound‐Guided Core Needle Biopsy for Diagnosing Lymphoma: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Performance and Safety of Ultrasound‐Guided Core Needle Biopsy for Diagnosing Lymphoma: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_short Diagnostic Performance and Safety of Ultrasound‐Guided Core Needle Biopsy for Diagnosing Lymphoma: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_sort diagnostic performance and safety of ultrasound guided core needle biopsy for diagnosing lymphoma a systematic review and meta analysis
topic core needle biopsy
lymphoma
meta‐analysis
systematic review
ultrasound
url https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.70414
work_keys_str_mv AT yongminkwon diagnosticperformanceandsafetyofultrasoundguidedcoreneedlebiopsyfordiagnosinglymphomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT minkyounglee diagnosticperformanceandsafetyofultrasoundguidedcoreneedlebiopsyfordiagnosinglymphomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis