Clinically meaningful classes of financial toxicity for patients with diabetes

Abstract Aims This study aims to improve the interpretability and clinical utility of the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity-Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (COST-FACIT) by identifying distinct financial toxicity classes in adults with diabetes. Methods Data included a sampl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Minal R. Patel, Jonathan P. Troost, Michele Heisler, Noelle E. Carlozzi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2025-01-01
Series:Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-024-00834-5
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841544563882196992
author Minal R. Patel
Jonathan P. Troost
Michele Heisler
Noelle E. Carlozzi
author_facet Minal R. Patel
Jonathan P. Troost
Michele Heisler
Noelle E. Carlozzi
author_sort Minal R. Patel
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Aims This study aims to improve the interpretability and clinical utility of the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity-Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (COST-FACIT) by identifying distinct financial toxicity classes in adults with diabetes. Methods Data included a sample of 600 adults with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes and high A1c. Latent Class Analysis was used to identify subgroups of patients based on COST-FACIT score patterns. Results We identified 3 financial toxicity classes (high, medium and low) with strong indicators of membership classification. Multiple indicators of financial stress, maladaptive cost-coping behaviors, more comorbidities, more prescribed medications, more diabetes distress, more depressive symptoms, closer to the federal poverty level, female, having lower educational attainment and being single were all significant predictors of high financial toxicity class membership. A score of 26 on the COST-FACIT was the strongest threshold for sorting high vs. medium/low financial toxicity, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 76% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 93%. Conclusion The COST-FACIT can be used to reliably identify people with diabetes that have high financial toxicity. Integrating this new cut-score into clinical practice may help clinical teams identify people in need of additional support due to financial toxicity.
format Article
id doaj-art-14cef9d3aa7a4775a2617c2b41b6566c
institution Kabale University
issn 2509-8020
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
spelling doaj-art-14cef9d3aa7a4775a2617c2b41b6566c2025-01-12T12:26:03ZengSpringerOpenJournal of Patient-Reported Outcomes2509-80202025-01-019111010.1186/s41687-024-00834-5Clinically meaningful classes of financial toxicity for patients with diabetesMinal R. Patel0Jonathan P. Troost1Michele Heisler2Noelle E. Carlozzi3Department of Health Behavior and Health Equity, University of MichiganMichigan Institute for Clinical Health Research, University of MichiganDepartment of Health Behavior and Health Equity, University of MichiganDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of MichiganAbstract Aims This study aims to improve the interpretability and clinical utility of the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity-Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (COST-FACIT) by identifying distinct financial toxicity classes in adults with diabetes. Methods Data included a sample of 600 adults with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes and high A1c. Latent Class Analysis was used to identify subgroups of patients based on COST-FACIT score patterns. Results We identified 3 financial toxicity classes (high, medium and low) with strong indicators of membership classification. Multiple indicators of financial stress, maladaptive cost-coping behaviors, more comorbidities, more prescribed medications, more diabetes distress, more depressive symptoms, closer to the federal poverty level, female, having lower educational attainment and being single were all significant predictors of high financial toxicity class membership. A score of 26 on the COST-FACIT was the strongest threshold for sorting high vs. medium/low financial toxicity, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 76% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 93%. Conclusion The COST-FACIT can be used to reliably identify people with diabetes that have high financial toxicity. Integrating this new cut-score into clinical practice may help clinical teams identify people in need of additional support due to financial toxicity.https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-024-00834-5Financial toxicityDiabetesFinancial burdenClinical practice
spellingShingle Minal R. Patel
Jonathan P. Troost
Michele Heisler
Noelle E. Carlozzi
Clinically meaningful classes of financial toxicity for patients with diabetes
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Financial toxicity
Diabetes
Financial burden
Clinical practice
title Clinically meaningful classes of financial toxicity for patients with diabetes
title_full Clinically meaningful classes of financial toxicity for patients with diabetes
title_fullStr Clinically meaningful classes of financial toxicity for patients with diabetes
title_full_unstemmed Clinically meaningful classes of financial toxicity for patients with diabetes
title_short Clinically meaningful classes of financial toxicity for patients with diabetes
title_sort clinically meaningful classes of financial toxicity for patients with diabetes
topic Financial toxicity
Diabetes
Financial burden
Clinical practice
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-024-00834-5
work_keys_str_mv AT minalrpatel clinicallymeaningfulclassesoffinancialtoxicityforpatientswithdiabetes
AT jonathanptroost clinicallymeaningfulclassesoffinancialtoxicityforpatientswithdiabetes
AT micheleheisler clinicallymeaningfulclassesoffinancialtoxicityforpatientswithdiabetes
AT noelleecarlozzi clinicallymeaningfulclassesoffinancialtoxicityforpatientswithdiabetes