Intérêt du principe de solidarité écologique pour la valorisation des usages pastoraux dans les Pyrénées
Some French lawyers support the establishment of a new category of goods, the “common goods” to deal with the ecological emergency. The political anthropology of juridicity focuses its attention on the social dynamics associated with "commoning". The aim is to restore the dynamics of law r...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fra |
| Published: |
Éditions en environnement VertigO
2022-12-01
|
| Series: | VertigO |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/vertigo/38413 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841552997718425600 |
|---|---|
| author | Sigrid Aubert |
| author_facet | Sigrid Aubert |
| author_sort | Sigrid Aubert |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Some French lawyers support the establishment of a new category of goods, the “common goods” to deal with the ecological emergency. The political anthropology of juridicity focuses its attention on the social dynamics associated with "commoning". The aim is to restore the dynamics of law revealed by legal pluralism by paying particular attention to the conditions of emergence and promotion of social innovations carried by collectives of users of the land and the natural resources. In many situations, these social innovations contribute to the assumption of responsibility by citizens for interdependent relationships between humans and between humans and non-humans, in contexts where the proposals put forward by the State or the markets do not seem satisfactory to the inhabitants of the territories concerned. According to this approach, it is possible to postulate that the general principle of ecological solidarity is completed by a legal fact: the existence of a (social and) ecological solidarity experienced by a collective of users (human and non-human). This fact generates, between the members of the communities of uses considered, duties and prerogatives, likely to constitute the source of a right opposable to third parties: a right to the use of the land and the natural resources it bears. The customary law associated with the expression of ecological solidarity can thus lead to the reification of particular, existing or desirable behaviours (including behaviours associated with the exercise of public power) at different territorial scales. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-1485e79779624db0a0d159d25f87cb17 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1492-8442 |
| language | fra |
| publishDate | 2022-12-01 |
| publisher | Éditions en environnement VertigO |
| record_format | Article |
| series | VertigO |
| spelling | doaj-art-1485e79779624db0a0d159d25f87cb172025-01-09T12:36:27ZfraÉditions en environnement VertigOVertigO1492-84422022-12-013710.4000/vertigo.38413Intérêt du principe de solidarité écologique pour la valorisation des usages pastoraux dans les PyrénéesSigrid AubertSome French lawyers support the establishment of a new category of goods, the “common goods” to deal with the ecological emergency. The political anthropology of juridicity focuses its attention on the social dynamics associated with "commoning". The aim is to restore the dynamics of law revealed by legal pluralism by paying particular attention to the conditions of emergence and promotion of social innovations carried by collectives of users of the land and the natural resources. In many situations, these social innovations contribute to the assumption of responsibility by citizens for interdependent relationships between humans and between humans and non-humans, in contexts where the proposals put forward by the State or the markets do not seem satisfactory to the inhabitants of the territories concerned. According to this approach, it is possible to postulate that the general principle of ecological solidarity is completed by a legal fact: the existence of a (social and) ecological solidarity experienced by a collective of users (human and non-human). This fact generates, between the members of the communities of uses considered, duties and prerogatives, likely to constitute the source of a right opposable to third parties: a right to the use of the land and the natural resources it bears. The customary law associated with the expression of ecological solidarity can thus lead to the reification of particular, existing or desirable behaviours (including behaviours associated with the exercise of public power) at different territorial scales.https://journals.openedition.org/vertigo/38413pastoralismPyreneesecological solidaritycustomary law |
| spellingShingle | Sigrid Aubert Intérêt du principe de solidarité écologique pour la valorisation des usages pastoraux dans les Pyrénées VertigO pastoralism Pyrenees ecological solidarity customary law |
| title | Intérêt du principe de solidarité écologique pour la valorisation des usages pastoraux dans les Pyrénées |
| title_full | Intérêt du principe de solidarité écologique pour la valorisation des usages pastoraux dans les Pyrénées |
| title_fullStr | Intérêt du principe de solidarité écologique pour la valorisation des usages pastoraux dans les Pyrénées |
| title_full_unstemmed | Intérêt du principe de solidarité écologique pour la valorisation des usages pastoraux dans les Pyrénées |
| title_short | Intérêt du principe de solidarité écologique pour la valorisation des usages pastoraux dans les Pyrénées |
| title_sort | interet du principe de solidarite ecologique pour la valorisation des usages pastoraux dans les pyrenees |
| topic | pastoralism Pyrenees ecological solidarity customary law |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/vertigo/38413 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sigridaubert interetduprincipedesolidariteecologiquepourlavalorisationdesusagespastorauxdanslespyrenees |