Effectiveness analysis of a pharmacist-led intervention for orthopedic perioperative use of antibiotics: a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundFollowing the Chinese guidelines’ recommendation to completely cancel routine cephalosporin skin tests, the choice of cephalosporin as surgical prophylactic medication was affected. This was due to the limited cognition of the predictive value of cephalosporin skin test or the desire to av...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Danwei Wu, Yingxu Li, Jiancun Zhen, Yong Wu, Shuang Ren, Yuan Zhao, Ning Sun, Xuanzi Lin, Liangpeng Lai, Wei Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2024-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Pharmacology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2024.1365370/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846167435962482688
author Danwei Wu
Yingxu Li
Jiancun Zhen
Yong Wu
Shuang Ren
Yuan Zhao
Ning Sun
Xuanzi Lin
Liangpeng Lai
Wei Zhang
author_facet Danwei Wu
Yingxu Li
Jiancun Zhen
Yong Wu
Shuang Ren
Yuan Zhao
Ning Sun
Xuanzi Lin
Liangpeng Lai
Wei Zhang
author_sort Danwei Wu
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundFollowing the Chinese guidelines’ recommendation to completely cancel routine cephalosporin skin tests, the choice of cephalosporin as surgical prophylactic medication was affected. This was due to the limited cognition of the predictive value of cephalosporin skin test or the desire to avoid medical disputes. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate whether the pharmacist-led perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis model could improve clinicians’ medical behavior in choosing cephalosporin antibiotics for surgical prophylaxis.MethodsFrom July 2021 to May 2022, a retrospective analysis was conducted on the selection of surgical preventive medication, skin test, postoperative infection and adverse drug reactions in foot and ankle surgery. The study was divided into three period: the rountine cephalosporin skin test period (Period I: Skin Test), the period when the routine cephalosporin skin test was cancelled but the pharmacist did not intervene (Period II: Cancel Skin Test), and the period when the pharmacist-led perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis was implemented after the cancellation of the cephalosporin skin test (Period III: Pharmacist Intervention).ResultsA total of 1,583 patients were enrolled in this study. There was no significant difference in the utilization rate of cefuroxime between the routine skin test stage and the skin test cancelled stage [74.92% (Period I) vs. 74.54% (Period II), P > 0.05]. However, in the pharmacist intervention stage, the usage rate of cefuroxime significantly increased compared to the initial stage when the skin test was cancelled [87.07% (Period III) vs. 74.54% (Period II), P < 0.05]. The use of cephalosporins also increased in patients with self-reported beta-lactam allergies between these stages [41.94% (Period III) vs. 3.22% (Period II), P < 0.05)]. There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative infection and adverse drug reactions among the three periods.ConclusionThe pharmacist-led perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis model can significantly improve the medical behavior of clinicians in choosing cephalosporin antibiotics as surgical prophylactic medication and optimize the perioperative medication plan.
format Article
id doaj-art-13c84cde57c04a40a7a9e4fbab4a4cec
institution Kabale University
issn 1663-9812
language English
publishDate 2024-11-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Pharmacology
spelling doaj-art-13c84cde57c04a40a7a9e4fbab4a4cec2024-11-14T16:29:05ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Pharmacology1663-98122024-11-011510.3389/fphar.2024.13653701365370Effectiveness analysis of a pharmacist-led intervention for orthopedic perioperative use of antibiotics: a retrospective cohort studyDanwei Wu0Yingxu Li1Jiancun Zhen2Yong Wu3Shuang Ren4Yuan Zhao5Ning Sun6Xuanzi Lin7Liangpeng Lai8Wei Zhang9Department of Pharmacy, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Pharmacy, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Pharmacy, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Pharmacy, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Pharmacy, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Pharmacy, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, ChinaBackgroundFollowing the Chinese guidelines’ recommendation to completely cancel routine cephalosporin skin tests, the choice of cephalosporin as surgical prophylactic medication was affected. This was due to the limited cognition of the predictive value of cephalosporin skin test or the desire to avoid medical disputes. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate whether the pharmacist-led perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis model could improve clinicians’ medical behavior in choosing cephalosporin antibiotics for surgical prophylaxis.MethodsFrom July 2021 to May 2022, a retrospective analysis was conducted on the selection of surgical preventive medication, skin test, postoperative infection and adverse drug reactions in foot and ankle surgery. The study was divided into three period: the rountine cephalosporin skin test period (Period I: Skin Test), the period when the routine cephalosporin skin test was cancelled but the pharmacist did not intervene (Period II: Cancel Skin Test), and the period when the pharmacist-led perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis was implemented after the cancellation of the cephalosporin skin test (Period III: Pharmacist Intervention).ResultsA total of 1,583 patients were enrolled in this study. There was no significant difference in the utilization rate of cefuroxime between the routine skin test stage and the skin test cancelled stage [74.92% (Period I) vs. 74.54% (Period II), P > 0.05]. However, in the pharmacist intervention stage, the usage rate of cefuroxime significantly increased compared to the initial stage when the skin test was cancelled [87.07% (Period III) vs. 74.54% (Period II), P < 0.05]. The use of cephalosporins also increased in patients with self-reported beta-lactam allergies between these stages [41.94% (Period III) vs. 3.22% (Period II), P < 0.05)]. There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative infection and adverse drug reactions among the three periods.ConclusionThe pharmacist-led perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis model can significantly improve the medical behavior of clinicians in choosing cephalosporin antibiotics as surgical prophylactic medication and optimize the perioperative medication plan.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2024.1365370/fullsurgical prophylaxisantimicrobial stewardshippharmacist interventionβ-lactam allergyorthopedic surgery
spellingShingle Danwei Wu
Yingxu Li
Jiancun Zhen
Yong Wu
Shuang Ren
Yuan Zhao
Ning Sun
Xuanzi Lin
Liangpeng Lai
Wei Zhang
Effectiveness analysis of a pharmacist-led intervention for orthopedic perioperative use of antibiotics: a retrospective cohort study
Frontiers in Pharmacology
surgical prophylaxis
antimicrobial stewardship
pharmacist intervention
β-lactam allergy
orthopedic surgery
title Effectiveness analysis of a pharmacist-led intervention for orthopedic perioperative use of antibiotics: a retrospective cohort study
title_full Effectiveness analysis of a pharmacist-led intervention for orthopedic perioperative use of antibiotics: a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Effectiveness analysis of a pharmacist-led intervention for orthopedic perioperative use of antibiotics: a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness analysis of a pharmacist-led intervention for orthopedic perioperative use of antibiotics: a retrospective cohort study
title_short Effectiveness analysis of a pharmacist-led intervention for orthopedic perioperative use of antibiotics: a retrospective cohort study
title_sort effectiveness analysis of a pharmacist led intervention for orthopedic perioperative use of antibiotics a retrospective cohort study
topic surgical prophylaxis
antimicrobial stewardship
pharmacist intervention
β-lactam allergy
orthopedic surgery
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2024.1365370/full
work_keys_str_mv AT danweiwu effectivenessanalysisofapharmacistledinterventionfororthopedicperioperativeuseofantibioticsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT yingxuli effectivenessanalysisofapharmacistledinterventionfororthopedicperioperativeuseofantibioticsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT jiancunzhen effectivenessanalysisofapharmacistledinterventionfororthopedicperioperativeuseofantibioticsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT yongwu effectivenessanalysisofapharmacistledinterventionfororthopedicperioperativeuseofantibioticsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT shuangren effectivenessanalysisofapharmacistledinterventionfororthopedicperioperativeuseofantibioticsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT yuanzhao effectivenessanalysisofapharmacistledinterventionfororthopedicperioperativeuseofantibioticsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT ningsun effectivenessanalysisofapharmacistledinterventionfororthopedicperioperativeuseofantibioticsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT xuanzilin effectivenessanalysisofapharmacistledinterventionfororthopedicperioperativeuseofantibioticsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT liangpenglai effectivenessanalysisofapharmacistledinterventionfororthopedicperioperativeuseofantibioticsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT weizhang effectivenessanalysisofapharmacistledinterventionfororthopedicperioperativeuseofantibioticsaretrospectivecohortstudy