Analysis of Whistleblowing in Academia

This paper aims to describe the status of whistleblowing channels in academic institutions as well as the perception that academics have towards the act of reporting unethical issues. Due to European legislation, organizations are obliged to provide reporting mechanisms. Our results show that a lar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Francisco Valente Gonçalves, Susana Sousa Lourenço, Sofia Correia Alegria, Darragh McCashin, Raquel Sampaio
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Instituto Paulista de Estudos Bioéticos e Jurídicos 2025-01-01
Series:Brazilian Journal of Forensic Sciences, Medical Law and Bioethics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://bjfs.org/bjfs/bjfs/article/view/1019
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841555876548182016
author Francisco Valente Gonçalves
Susana Sousa Lourenço
Sofia Correia Alegria
Darragh McCashin
Raquel Sampaio
author_facet Francisco Valente Gonçalves
Susana Sousa Lourenço
Sofia Correia Alegria
Darragh McCashin
Raquel Sampaio
author_sort Francisco Valente Gonçalves
collection DOAJ
description This paper aims to describe the status of whistleblowing channels in academic institutions as well as the perception that academics have towards the act of reporting unethical issues. Due to European legislation, organizations are obliged to provide reporting mechanisms. Our results show that a large number of individuals within the academic context suffer unethical issues. These results may trigger the possibility that academic institutions have been failing (i) to provide robust mechanisms to identify and investigate unethical behaviors in academia and (ii) to disseminate/discuss the act of reporting within students and staff. Taking into consideration the results and the reality that exists in academic institutions where demanding workload and stress promote environments where retaliations are expected, the authors discuss needs that institutions need to reflect on regarding compliance, integrity and ethics as well as forensic evidence that can be used in investigations in order to provide a safe space to report unethical issues that are observed or experienced.
format Article
id doaj-art-13c2d87af51544ba8abf6e1d4a8b09aa
institution Kabale University
issn 2237-261X
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Instituto Paulista de Estudos Bioéticos e Jurídicos
record_format Article
series Brazilian Journal of Forensic Sciences, Medical Law and Bioethics
spelling doaj-art-13c2d87af51544ba8abf6e1d4a8b09aa2025-01-07T19:23:47ZengInstituto Paulista de Estudos Bioéticos e JurídicosBrazilian Journal of Forensic Sciences, Medical Law and Bioethics2237-261X2025-01-0112310.17063/bjfs12(3)y2024274-290Analysis of Whistleblowing in AcademiaFrancisco Valente Gonçalves0Susana Sousa Lourenço1Sofia Correia Alegria2Darragh McCashin3Raquel Sampaio4RUMO.Solutions, Lisboa, PortugalRUMO.Solutions, Lisboa, PortugalRUMO.Solutions, Lisboa, PortugalSchool of Psychology, Dublin City University, Dublin, IrelandDireito Mental, Lisboa, Portugal This paper aims to describe the status of whistleblowing channels in academic institutions as well as the perception that academics have towards the act of reporting unethical issues. Due to European legislation, organizations are obliged to provide reporting mechanisms. Our results show that a large number of individuals within the academic context suffer unethical issues. These results may trigger the possibility that academic institutions have been failing (i) to provide robust mechanisms to identify and investigate unethical behaviors in academia and (ii) to disseminate/discuss the act of reporting within students and staff. Taking into consideration the results and the reality that exists in academic institutions where demanding workload and stress promote environments where retaliations are expected, the authors discuss needs that institutions need to reflect on regarding compliance, integrity and ethics as well as forensic evidence that can be used in investigations in order to provide a safe space to report unethical issues that are observed or experienced. https://bjfs.org/bjfs/bjfs/article/view/1019WhistleblowingAcademiaWellbeing
spellingShingle Francisco Valente Gonçalves
Susana Sousa Lourenço
Sofia Correia Alegria
Darragh McCashin
Raquel Sampaio
Analysis of Whistleblowing in Academia
Brazilian Journal of Forensic Sciences, Medical Law and Bioethics
Whistleblowing
Academia
Wellbeing
title Analysis of Whistleblowing in Academia
title_full Analysis of Whistleblowing in Academia
title_fullStr Analysis of Whistleblowing in Academia
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Whistleblowing in Academia
title_short Analysis of Whistleblowing in Academia
title_sort analysis of whistleblowing in academia
topic Whistleblowing
Academia
Wellbeing
url https://bjfs.org/bjfs/bjfs/article/view/1019
work_keys_str_mv AT franciscovalentegoncalves analysisofwhistleblowinginacademia
AT susanasousalourenco analysisofwhistleblowinginacademia
AT sofiacorreiaalegria analysisofwhistleblowinginacademia
AT darraghmccashin analysisofwhistleblowinginacademia
AT raquelsampaio analysisofwhistleblowinginacademia