Plastic stress intensity factor behavior at small and large scale yielding
In this paper the plastic stress intensity factor (SIF) is used to study the coupling effects of the loading biaxiality, the material properties and the cracked body configuration in both the small- and large-scale yielding ranges. A finite element (FE) analysis is performed for a cracked Mode I pla...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Gruppo Italiano Frattura
2020-07-01
|
| Series: | Fracture and Structural Integrity |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.fracturae.com/index.php/fis/article/view/2788/2998 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841562222650720256 |
|---|---|
| author | Alexander Zakharov Valery Shlyannikov Anastasia Tartygasheva |
| author_facet | Alexander Zakharov Valery Shlyannikov Anastasia Tartygasheva |
| author_sort | Alexander Zakharov |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In this paper the plastic stress intensity factor (SIF) is used to study the coupling effects of the loading biaxiality, the material properties and the cracked body configuration in both the small- and large-scale yielding ranges. A finite element (FE) analysis is performed for a cracked Mode I plane strain plate subjected to biaxial tension/compression loading. The governing parameter of the elasticplastic crack-tip stress field In-integral at the crack tip, the J-integral, and the plastic SIF, are calculated as a functions of the loading biaxiality and the applied stress levels. The different trend of the In-integral distributions as a function of the applied stresses with respect to the J-integral is demonstrated. The contrary character of the distributions of the plastic SIF and the J-integral as a function of the biaxial stress ratio is observed. Special emphasis is put on the behavior of the J-integral and the plastic SIF for the specified test specimen geometries under mixed mode loading. The coupling effects of the mixed mode fracture and the material properties on the J-integral and the plastic SIF distributions for a set of the specimen configurations are stated. Comparative analysis of the values of the plastic SIF calculated for both small-scale and large-scale yielding in the test specimen configurations considered here is presented. A significant difference between the small- and the large-scale yielding plastic SIF in the full range of mixed modes is shown. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-1385c983ba8b4d3d80c20c3ef3a7486a |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1971-8993 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2020-07-01 |
| publisher | Gruppo Italiano Frattura |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Fracture and Structural Integrity |
| spelling | doaj-art-1385c983ba8b4d3d80c20c3ef3a7486a2025-01-03T01:05:15ZengGruppo Italiano FratturaFracture and Structural Integrity1971-89932020-07-01145322323510.3221/IGF-ESIS.53.1910.3221/IGF-ESIS.53.19Plastic stress intensity factor behavior at small and large scale yieldingAlexander ZakharovValery ShlyannikovAnastasia TartygashevaIn this paper the plastic stress intensity factor (SIF) is used to study the coupling effects of the loading biaxiality, the material properties and the cracked body configuration in both the small- and large-scale yielding ranges. A finite element (FE) analysis is performed for a cracked Mode I plane strain plate subjected to biaxial tension/compression loading. The governing parameter of the elasticplastic crack-tip stress field In-integral at the crack tip, the J-integral, and the plastic SIF, are calculated as a functions of the loading biaxiality and the applied stress levels. The different trend of the In-integral distributions as a function of the applied stresses with respect to the J-integral is demonstrated. The contrary character of the distributions of the plastic SIF and the J-integral as a function of the biaxial stress ratio is observed. Special emphasis is put on the behavior of the J-integral and the plastic SIF for the specified test specimen geometries under mixed mode loading. The coupling effects of the mixed mode fracture and the material properties on the J-integral and the plastic SIF distributions for a set of the specimen configurations are stated. Comparative analysis of the values of the plastic SIF calculated for both small-scale and large-scale yielding in the test specimen configurations considered here is presented. A significant difference between the small- and the large-scale yielding plastic SIF in the full range of mixed modes is shown.https://www.fracturae.com/index.php/fis/article/view/2788/2998biaxial loadingj-integralplastic stress intensity factormixed mode loading |
| spellingShingle | Alexander Zakharov Valery Shlyannikov Anastasia Tartygasheva Plastic stress intensity factor behavior at small and large scale yielding Fracture and Structural Integrity biaxial loading j-integral plastic stress intensity factor mixed mode loading |
| title | Plastic stress intensity factor behavior at small and large scale yielding |
| title_full | Plastic stress intensity factor behavior at small and large scale yielding |
| title_fullStr | Plastic stress intensity factor behavior at small and large scale yielding |
| title_full_unstemmed | Plastic stress intensity factor behavior at small and large scale yielding |
| title_short | Plastic stress intensity factor behavior at small and large scale yielding |
| title_sort | plastic stress intensity factor behavior at small and large scale yielding |
| topic | biaxial loading j-integral plastic stress intensity factor mixed mode loading |
| url | https://www.fracturae.com/index.php/fis/article/view/2788/2998 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT alexanderzakharov plasticstressintensityfactorbehavioratsmallandlargescaleyielding AT valeryshlyannikov plasticstressintensityfactorbehavioratsmallandlargescaleyielding AT anastasiatartygasheva plasticstressintensityfactorbehavioratsmallandlargescaleyielding |