A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing 2 Different Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons in De Novo Coronary Artery Disease

Background: The Genoss paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) is a novel PCB with shellac and vitamin E as excipients, enhancing drug delivery to the target lesion and minimizing restenosis. Objectives: This study aimed to compare quantitative coronary angiographic outcomes at 6 months after treatment of d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eun-Seok Shin, MD, PhD, Yongwhi Park, MD, PhD, Jong-Young Lee, MD, PhD, Ae-Young Her, MD, PhD, Min-Ku Chon, MD, PhD, Sunwon Kim, MD, PhD, Seung-Woon Rha, MD, PhD, Gyu Chul Oh, MD, PhD, Deok-Kyu Cho, MD, PhD, Bitna Kim, MS, Jang-Whan Bae, MD, PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-01-01
Series:JACC: Asia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772374724004721
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841553721727647744
author Eun-Seok Shin, MD, PhD
Yongwhi Park, MD, PhD
Jong-Young Lee, MD, PhD
Ae-Young Her, MD, PhD
Min-Ku Chon, MD, PhD
Sunwon Kim, MD, PhD
Seung-Woon Rha, MD, PhD
Gyu Chul Oh, MD, PhD
Deok-Kyu Cho, MD, PhD
Bitna Kim, MS
Jang-Whan Bae, MD, PhD
author_facet Eun-Seok Shin, MD, PhD
Yongwhi Park, MD, PhD
Jong-Young Lee, MD, PhD
Ae-Young Her, MD, PhD
Min-Ku Chon, MD, PhD
Sunwon Kim, MD, PhD
Seung-Woon Rha, MD, PhD
Gyu Chul Oh, MD, PhD
Deok-Kyu Cho, MD, PhD
Bitna Kim, MS
Jang-Whan Bae, MD, PhD
author_sort Eun-Seok Shin, MD, PhD
collection DOAJ
description Background: The Genoss paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) is a novel PCB with shellac and vitamin E as excipients, enhancing drug delivery to the target lesion and minimizing restenosis. Objectives: This study aimed to compare quantitative coronary angiographic outcomes at 6 months after treatment of de novo coronary artery disease (CAD) with 2 different types of PCBs. Methods: This prospective, multicenter, noninferiority trial randomized 204 patients with chronic coronary syndrome or stabilized acute coronary syndrome to treatment with the shellac and vitamin E-based PCB or the reference PCB (SeQuent Please NEO) in a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was noninferiority for the 6-month angiographic in-lesion late lumen loss. Results: The 6-month in-lesion late lumen loss was 0.06 ± 0.38 mm with shellac and vitamin E-based PCB vs 0.09 ± 0.36 mm with reference PCB. The 1-sided 97.5% upper confidence limit of the difference was 0.08 mm, which was lower than the noninferiority limit of 0.15 mm, achieving noninferiority (P for noninferiority = 0.001). There was comparable late lumen enlargement (44.7% vs 42.7%; P = 0.903) and binary restenosis rates (3.2% vs 6.7%; P = 0.442) following treatment with shellac and vitamin E-based PCB and reference PCB, respectively. Both PCBs had similar 12-month rates of target vessel failure (3.0% in shellac and vitamin E-based PCB vs 4.3% in reference PCB; P = 0.921). Conclusions: The Genoss PCB, formulated with shellac and vitamin E as excipients, demonstrated angiographic outcomes comparable to a clinically proven PCB in the treatment of de novo CAD. (Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Genoss® DCB and SeQuent® Please NEO in Coronary De Novo Lesions; NCT05096442)
format Article
id doaj-art-11ee9c0a0b3d43bfa2634cd9f2703ca5
institution Kabale University
issn 2772-3747
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series JACC: Asia
spelling doaj-art-11ee9c0a0b3d43bfa2634cd9f2703ca52025-01-09T06:14:57ZengElsevierJACC: Asia2772-37472025-01-01511524A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing 2 Different Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons in De Novo Coronary Artery DiseaseEun-Seok Shin, MD, PhD0Yongwhi Park, MD, PhD1Jong-Young Lee, MD, PhD2Ae-Young Her, MD, PhD3Min-Ku Chon, MD, PhD4Sunwon Kim, MD, PhD5Seung-Woon Rha, MD, PhD6Gyu Chul Oh, MD, PhD7Deok-Kyu Cho, MD, PhD8Bitna Kim, MS9Jang-Whan Bae, MD, PhD10Department of Cardiology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, South Korea; Address for correspondence: Dr Eun-Seok Shin, Department of Cardiology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 877 Bangeojinsunhwan-doro, Dong-gu, Ulsan 44033, South Korea.Department of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine and Cardiovascular Center, South KoreaDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South KoreaDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangwon National University College of Medicine, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, Chuncheon, South KoreaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Cardiovascular Center and Research institute for Convergence of biomedical science and technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, South KoreaDepartment of Cardiology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, South KoreaCardiovascular Center, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, South KoreaCardiovascular Center and Cardiology Division, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South KoreaYonsei University College of Medicine and Cardiovascular Center, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yongin, South KoreaDepartment of Cardiology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, South KoreaDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Chungbuk National University, College of Medicine, Cheongju, South KoreaBackground: The Genoss paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) is a novel PCB with shellac and vitamin E as excipients, enhancing drug delivery to the target lesion and minimizing restenosis. Objectives: This study aimed to compare quantitative coronary angiographic outcomes at 6 months after treatment of de novo coronary artery disease (CAD) with 2 different types of PCBs. Methods: This prospective, multicenter, noninferiority trial randomized 204 patients with chronic coronary syndrome or stabilized acute coronary syndrome to treatment with the shellac and vitamin E-based PCB or the reference PCB (SeQuent Please NEO) in a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was noninferiority for the 6-month angiographic in-lesion late lumen loss. Results: The 6-month in-lesion late lumen loss was 0.06 ± 0.38 mm with shellac and vitamin E-based PCB vs 0.09 ± 0.36 mm with reference PCB. The 1-sided 97.5% upper confidence limit of the difference was 0.08 mm, which was lower than the noninferiority limit of 0.15 mm, achieving noninferiority (P for noninferiority = 0.001). There was comparable late lumen enlargement (44.7% vs 42.7%; P = 0.903) and binary restenosis rates (3.2% vs 6.7%; P = 0.442) following treatment with shellac and vitamin E-based PCB and reference PCB, respectively. Both PCBs had similar 12-month rates of target vessel failure (3.0% in shellac and vitamin E-based PCB vs 4.3% in reference PCB; P = 0.921). Conclusions: The Genoss PCB, formulated with shellac and vitamin E as excipients, demonstrated angiographic outcomes comparable to a clinically proven PCB in the treatment of de novo CAD. (Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Genoss® DCB and SeQuent® Please NEO in Coronary De Novo Lesions; NCT05096442)http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772374724004721drug-coated balloonoutcomepaclitaxelpercutaneous coronary interventionrandomized controlled trial
spellingShingle Eun-Seok Shin, MD, PhD
Yongwhi Park, MD, PhD
Jong-Young Lee, MD, PhD
Ae-Young Her, MD, PhD
Min-Ku Chon, MD, PhD
Sunwon Kim, MD, PhD
Seung-Woon Rha, MD, PhD
Gyu Chul Oh, MD, PhD
Deok-Kyu Cho, MD, PhD
Bitna Kim, MS
Jang-Whan Bae, MD, PhD
A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing 2 Different Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons in De Novo Coronary Artery Disease
JACC: Asia
drug-coated balloon
outcome
paclitaxel
percutaneous coronary intervention
randomized controlled trial
title A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing 2 Different Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons in De Novo Coronary Artery Disease
title_full A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing 2 Different Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons in De Novo Coronary Artery Disease
title_fullStr A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing 2 Different Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons in De Novo Coronary Artery Disease
title_full_unstemmed A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing 2 Different Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons in De Novo Coronary Artery Disease
title_short A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing 2 Different Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons in De Novo Coronary Artery Disease
title_sort prospective randomized trial comparing 2 different paclitaxel coated balloons in de novo coronary artery disease
topic drug-coated balloon
outcome
paclitaxel
percutaneous coronary intervention
randomized controlled trial
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772374724004721
work_keys_str_mv AT eunseokshinmdphd aprospectiverandomizedtrialcomparing2differentpaclitaxelcoatedballoonsindenovocoronaryarterydisease
AT yongwhiparkmdphd aprospectiverandomizedtrialcomparing2differentpaclitaxelcoatedballoonsindenovocoronaryarterydisease
AT jongyoungleemdphd aprospectiverandomizedtrialcomparing2differentpaclitaxelcoatedballoonsindenovocoronaryarterydisease
AT aeyounghermdphd aprospectiverandomizedtrialcomparing2differentpaclitaxelcoatedballoonsindenovocoronaryarterydisease
AT minkuchonmdphd aprospectiverandomizedtrialcomparing2differentpaclitaxelcoatedballoonsindenovocoronaryarterydisease
AT sunwonkimmdphd aprospectiverandomizedtrialcomparing2differentpaclitaxelcoatedballoonsindenovocoronaryarterydisease
AT seungwoonrhamdphd aprospectiverandomizedtrialcomparing2differentpaclitaxelcoatedballoonsindenovocoronaryarterydisease
AT gyuchulohmdphd aprospectiverandomizedtrialcomparing2differentpaclitaxelcoatedballoonsindenovocoronaryarterydisease
AT deokkyuchomdphd aprospectiverandomizedtrialcomparing2differentpaclitaxelcoatedballoonsindenovocoronaryarterydisease
AT bitnakimms aprospectiverandomizedtrialcomparing2differentpaclitaxelcoatedballoonsindenovocoronaryarterydisease
AT jangwhanbaemdphd aprospectiverandomizedtrialcomparing2differentpaclitaxelcoatedballoonsindenovocoronaryarterydisease
AT eunseokshinmdphd prospectiverandomizedtrialcomparing2differentpaclitaxelcoatedballoonsindenovocoronaryarterydisease
AT yongwhiparkmdphd prospectiverandomizedtrialcomparing2differentpaclitaxelcoatedballoonsindenovocoronaryarterydisease
AT jongyoungleemdphd prospectiverandomizedtrialcomparing2differentpaclitaxelcoatedballoonsindenovocoronaryarterydisease
AT aeyounghermdphd prospectiverandomizedtrialcomparing2differentpaclitaxelcoatedballoonsindenovocoronaryarterydisease
AT minkuchonmdphd prospectiverandomizedtrialcomparing2differentpaclitaxelcoatedballoonsindenovocoronaryarterydisease
AT sunwonkimmdphd prospectiverandomizedtrialcomparing2differentpaclitaxelcoatedballoonsindenovocoronaryarterydisease
AT seungwoonrhamdphd prospectiverandomizedtrialcomparing2differentpaclitaxelcoatedballoonsindenovocoronaryarterydisease
AT gyuchulohmdphd prospectiverandomizedtrialcomparing2differentpaclitaxelcoatedballoonsindenovocoronaryarterydisease
AT deokkyuchomdphd prospectiverandomizedtrialcomparing2differentpaclitaxelcoatedballoonsindenovocoronaryarterydisease
AT bitnakimms prospectiverandomizedtrialcomparing2differentpaclitaxelcoatedballoonsindenovocoronaryarterydisease
AT jangwhanbaemdphd prospectiverandomizedtrialcomparing2differentpaclitaxelcoatedballoonsindenovocoronaryarterydisease