ROMANIAN COURTS HOLDING JURISDICTION IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROBATION MEASURES
The new law of enforcement of sanctions and non-deprivation procedural measures, namely Law no. 253/2013 regulates “the jurisdictional nature of execution”. This jurisdictional nature of the enforcement of sanctions and non-deprivation procedural measures reflects through the involvement of the cou...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Nicolae Titulescu University Publishing House
2019-05-01
|
| Series: | Challenges of the Knowledge Society |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://cks.univnt.ro/download/cks_2019_articles%252F1_criminal_law%252FCKS_2019_criminal_law_003.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1846146869394145280 |
|---|---|
| author | Andrei-Dorin BĂNCILĂ |
| author_facet | Andrei-Dorin BĂNCILĂ |
| author_sort | Andrei-Dorin BĂNCILĂ |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The new law of enforcement of sanctions and non-deprivation procedural measures, namely Law no. 253/2013 regulates “the jurisdictional nature of execution”. This jurisdictional nature of the enforcement of sanctions and non-deprivation procedural measures reflects through the involvement of the courts in the resolution of a significant number of issues related to enforcement. Courts, either by judges delegated with administrative or judicial-administrative competences, or by judges in full capacity and who performs purely judicial duties specific to the judicial function, are called upon to perform activities designed to ensure the enforcement of the precepts contained in the court order or to regularize the actual execution by solving the incidents that arise during the execution. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-1012dac010184c58a4c07d5329414b05 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2068-7796 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2019-05-01 |
| publisher | Nicolae Titulescu University Publishing House |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Challenges of the Knowledge Society |
| spelling | doaj-art-1012dac010184c58a4c07d5329414b052024-12-02T00:48:00ZengNicolae Titulescu University Publishing HouseChallenges of the Knowledge Society2068-77962019-05-011312532ROMANIAN COURTS HOLDING JURISDICTION IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROBATION MEASURESAndrei-Dorin BĂNCILĂ0Faculty of Law „Nicolae Titulescu” University of Bucharest, RomaniaThe new law of enforcement of sanctions and non-deprivation procedural measures, namely Law no. 253/2013 regulates “the jurisdictional nature of execution”. This jurisdictional nature of the enforcement of sanctions and non-deprivation procedural measures reflects through the involvement of the courts in the resolution of a significant number of issues related to enforcement. Courts, either by judges delegated with administrative or judicial-administrative competences, or by judges in full capacity and who performs purely judicial duties specific to the judicial function, are called upon to perform activities designed to ensure the enforcement of the precepts contained in the court order or to regularize the actual execution by solving the incidents that arise during the execution.http://cks.univnt.ro/download/cks_2019_articles%252F1_criminal_law%252FCKS_2019_criminal_law_003.pdfprobation measuresthe enforcement courtthe judge delegated with the enforcementthe clerk delegated to the criminal enforcement departmentthe executionthe annulment and the revocation of the postponement of the punishmentthe suspension of the execution of the punishment under supervision or the conditional release |
| spellingShingle | Andrei-Dorin BĂNCILĂ ROMANIAN COURTS HOLDING JURISDICTION IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROBATION MEASURES Challenges of the Knowledge Society probation measures the enforcement court the judge delegated with the enforcement the clerk delegated to the criminal enforcement department the execution the annulment and the revocation of the postponement of the punishment the suspension of the execution of the punishment under supervision or the conditional release |
| title | ROMANIAN COURTS HOLDING JURISDICTION IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROBATION MEASURES |
| title_full | ROMANIAN COURTS HOLDING JURISDICTION IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROBATION MEASURES |
| title_fullStr | ROMANIAN COURTS HOLDING JURISDICTION IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROBATION MEASURES |
| title_full_unstemmed | ROMANIAN COURTS HOLDING JURISDICTION IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROBATION MEASURES |
| title_short | ROMANIAN COURTS HOLDING JURISDICTION IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROBATION MEASURES |
| title_sort | romanian courts holding jurisdiction in the implementation of the probation measures |
| topic | probation measures the enforcement court the judge delegated with the enforcement the clerk delegated to the criminal enforcement department the execution the annulment and the revocation of the postponement of the punishment the suspension of the execution of the punishment under supervision or the conditional release |
| url | http://cks.univnt.ro/download/cks_2019_articles%252F1_criminal_law%252FCKS_2019_criminal_law_003.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT andreidorinbancila romaniancourtsholdingjurisdictionintheimplementationoftheprobationmeasures |