Austen Henry Layard at the remains of Nineveh: The everyday life of an archaeological expedition

The everyday life of research laboratories has been widely viewed as a promising avenue of historiographic studies concerning the accumulation, processing, and production of scholastic knowledge, which depends on many internal and external factors. Austen Henry Layard’s expedition is an unusual exam...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: A.A. Popova
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Kazan Federal University 2021-12-01
Series:Ученые записки Казанского университета: Серия Гуманитарные науки
Subjects:
Online Access:https://kpfu.ru/uz-eng-hum-2021-6-9.html
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The everyday life of research laboratories has been widely viewed as a promising avenue of historiographic studies concerning the accumulation, processing, and production of scholastic knowledge, which depends on many internal and external factors. Austen Henry Layard’s expedition is an unusual example of a historian’s laboratory. Most modern scholars agree that the excavations carried out by him date back to the prescientific stage in archeology development. At this stage, the theoretical and methodological foundations of this discipline were still undeveloped. Nevertheless, A.H. Layard’s contribution to the deve­lopment of historical scholarship in general and Assyriology in particular was enormous. From that standpoint, the research performed at A.H. Layard’s laboratory, the process of obtaining and formalizing knowledge within it, and the factors that influenced its activity are of great interest. This article focuses on the factors of the everyday life of a laboratory scholar. Their influence on how the studies of the expedition’s materials were performed is analyzed. A.H. Layard’s main work “Nineveh and Its Remains” became a bestseller and drew the public’s attention to the Assyrian history and culture, as well as marked the beginning of the Assyriological research legitimization among scholars.
ISSN:2541-7738
2500-2171