Comparison of influence of high thoracic epidural anesthesia and central analgesia on hemodynamic during on-bypass coronary artery bypass grafting

Objective. Despite some advantages, the use of high thoracic epidural anesthesia (HTEA) during cardiac operations may be discouraged by fear of adverse hemodynamic effects. Aim. To compare the hemodynamic effects of HTEA and central analgesia (CA) during on-bypass CABG. Methods. 132 patients were...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: V. A. Sobokar, S. N. Gritsenko, M. S. Potapenko
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Zaporizhzhia State Medical and Pharmaceutical University 2015-06-01
Series:Zaporožskij Medicinskij Žurnal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://zmj.zsmu.edu.ua/article/view/44487/42745
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849308668015673344
author V. A. Sobokar
S. N. Gritsenko
M. S. Potapenko
author_facet V. A. Sobokar
S. N. Gritsenko
M. S. Potapenko
author_sort V. A. Sobokar
collection DOAJ
description Objective. Despite some advantages, the use of high thoracic epidural anesthesia (HTEA) during cardiac operations may be discouraged by fear of adverse hemodynamic effects. Aim. To compare the hemodynamic effects of HTEA and central analgesia (CA) during on-bypass CABG. Methods. 132 patients were assigned into two groups – study group (n = 85), where the surgery was carried out under HTEA and control group (n = 47) - where the surgery was carried out under CA. Data of the intraoperative monitoring and trans-oesophageal cardiac ultrasound - cardiac index (CI), stroke index (SI), ejection fraction (EF) and index of systemic vascular resistance (ISVR) were obtained. Results. After induction and sternotomy patients in the study group had higher EF - 57(53, 65)% vs 54 ± 7% (p = 0,013) and 55 ± 8 vs 52 ± 9%, (p = 0,031). After sternotomy CI and SI in the study group were also higher, respectively 2,42 (2,0;3,1) vs 2,23±0,63 l · min-1 · m-2, (p = 0,041) and 43 (34;46) vs 37±10 ml · m-2 (p = 0.014). Conclusion. We concluded that HTEA has advantages over CA by its influence on hemodynamics.
format Article
id doaj-art-0f0542c556db46ecb6c50f7843801ce8
institution Kabale University
issn 2306-4145
2310-1210
language English
publishDate 2015-06-01
publisher Zaporizhzhia State Medical and Pharmaceutical University
record_format Article
series Zaporožskij Medicinskij Žurnal
spelling doaj-art-0f0542c556db46ecb6c50f7843801ce82025-08-20T03:54:24ZengZaporizhzhia State Medical and Pharmaceutical UniversityZaporožskij Medicinskij Žurnal2306-41452310-12102015-06-0136064http://dx.doi.org/10.14739/2310-1210.2015.3.44487Comparison of influence of high thoracic epidural anesthesia and central analgesia on hemodynamic during on-bypass coronary artery bypass graftingV. A. Sobokar S. N. GritsenkoM. S. PotapenkoObjective. Despite some advantages, the use of high thoracic epidural anesthesia (HTEA) during cardiac operations may be discouraged by fear of adverse hemodynamic effects. Aim. To compare the hemodynamic effects of HTEA and central analgesia (CA) during on-bypass CABG. Methods. 132 patients were assigned into two groups – study group (n = 85), where the surgery was carried out under HTEA and control group (n = 47) - where the surgery was carried out under CA. Data of the intraoperative monitoring and trans-oesophageal cardiac ultrasound - cardiac index (CI), stroke index (SI), ejection fraction (EF) and index of systemic vascular resistance (ISVR) were obtained. Results. After induction and sternotomy patients in the study group had higher EF - 57(53, 65)% vs 54 ± 7% (p = 0,013) and 55 ± 8 vs 52 ± 9%, (p = 0,031). After sternotomy CI and SI in the study group were also higher, respectively 2,42 (2,0;3,1) vs 2,23±0,63 l · min-1 · m-2, (p = 0,041) and 43 (34;46) vs 37±10 ml · m-2 (p = 0.014). Conclusion. We concluded that HTEA has advantages over CA by its influence on hemodynamics.http://zmj.zsmu.edu.ua/article/view/44487/42745Epidural AnesthesiaAnalgesiaHemodynamics
spellingShingle V. A. Sobokar
S. N. Gritsenko
M. S. Potapenko
Comparison of influence of high thoracic epidural anesthesia and central analgesia on hemodynamic during on-bypass coronary artery bypass grafting
Zaporožskij Medicinskij Žurnal
Epidural Anesthesia
Analgesia
Hemodynamics
title Comparison of influence of high thoracic epidural anesthesia and central analgesia on hemodynamic during on-bypass coronary artery bypass grafting
title_full Comparison of influence of high thoracic epidural anesthesia and central analgesia on hemodynamic during on-bypass coronary artery bypass grafting
title_fullStr Comparison of influence of high thoracic epidural anesthesia and central analgesia on hemodynamic during on-bypass coronary artery bypass grafting
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of influence of high thoracic epidural anesthesia and central analgesia on hemodynamic during on-bypass coronary artery bypass grafting
title_short Comparison of influence of high thoracic epidural anesthesia and central analgesia on hemodynamic during on-bypass coronary artery bypass grafting
title_sort comparison of influence of high thoracic epidural anesthesia and central analgesia on hemodynamic during on bypass coronary artery bypass grafting
topic Epidural Anesthesia
Analgesia
Hemodynamics
url http://zmj.zsmu.edu.ua/article/view/44487/42745
work_keys_str_mv AT vasobokar comparisonofinfluenceofhighthoracicepiduralanesthesiaandcentralanalgesiaonhemodynamicduringonbypasscoronaryarterybypassgrafting
AT sngritsenko comparisonofinfluenceofhighthoracicepiduralanesthesiaandcentralanalgesiaonhemodynamicduringonbypasscoronaryarterybypassgrafting
AT mspotapenko comparisonofinfluenceofhighthoracicepiduralanesthesiaandcentralanalgesiaonhemodynamicduringonbypasscoronaryarterybypassgrafting