Airway pressures generated by high flow nasal cannula in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a computational study

Abstract Introduction and objectives High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy is an increasingly popular mode of non-invasive respiratory support for the treatment of patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF). Previous experimental studies in healthy subjects have established that HFNC...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hossein Shamohammadi, Liam Weaver, Sina Saffaran, Roberto Tonelli, Marianna Laviola, John G. Laffey, Luigi Camporota, Timothy E. Scott, Jonathan G. Hardman, Enrico Clini, Declan G. Bates
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-01-01
Series:Respiratory Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-025-03096-x
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841544335405875200
author Hossein Shamohammadi
Liam Weaver
Sina Saffaran
Roberto Tonelli
Marianna Laviola
John G. Laffey
Luigi Camporota
Timothy E. Scott
Jonathan G. Hardman
Enrico Clini
Declan G. Bates
author_facet Hossein Shamohammadi
Liam Weaver
Sina Saffaran
Roberto Tonelli
Marianna Laviola
John G. Laffey
Luigi Camporota
Timothy E. Scott
Jonathan G. Hardman
Enrico Clini
Declan G. Bates
author_sort Hossein Shamohammadi
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction and objectives High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy is an increasingly popular mode of non-invasive respiratory support for the treatment of patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF). Previous experimental studies in healthy subjects have established that HFNC generates flow-dependent positive airway pressures, but no data is available on the levels of mean airway pressure (mPaw) or positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) generated by HFNC therapy in AHRF patients. We aimed to estimate the airway pressures generated by HFNC at different flow rates in patients with AHRF, whose functional lung volume may be significantly reduced compared to healthy subjects due to alveolar consolidation and/or collapse. Materials and methods We developed a high-fidelity mechanistic computational model of the cardiopulmonary system during HFNC therapy using data from healthy subjects, and then measured the mPaw and PEEP levels produced when different amounts of alveolar consolidation/collapse were incorporated into the model. Results When calibrated to represent normal lung physiology in healthy subjects, our model recapitulates the airway pressures produced by HFNC at different flow rates in healthy volunteers who were breathing normally, with their mouths closed or open. When different amounts of alveolar consolidation/collapse are implemented in the model to reflect the pathophysiology of AHRF, the mPaw and PEEP produced by HFNC at all flow rates increase as the functional lung volume decreases (up to a mPaw of 11.53 and a PEEP of 11.41 cmH2O at 60 L/min with the mouth closed when 50% of the model’s alveolar compartments are non-aerated). When the model was matched to individual patient data from a cohort of 58 patients with AHRF receiving HFNC at 60 L/min, the mean (standard deviation) of the mPaw / PEEP produced by HFNC in the models of these patients was 8.56 (1.50) / 8.92 (1.49) cmH2O with mouths closed, and 1.73 (0.31) / 1.36 (0.36) cmH2O with mouths open. Conclusions Our results suggest that the airway pressures produced by HFNC in patients with AHRF could be higher than is currently assumed based on experimental data from healthy subjects, particularly in patients whose mouths remain closed. Higher levels of PEEP could be beneficial if they lead to alveolar recruitment and improved lung compliance, but could cause alveolar overdistension if they do not, motivating the close monitoring of the effects of HFNC on lung mechanics. Further clinical studies are warranted to directly measure the airway pressures produced by HFNC in patients with different severities of AHRF.
format Article
id doaj-art-0e91d9f793a24d3096522be35d4a35a5
institution Kabale University
issn 1465-993X
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Respiratory Research
spelling doaj-art-0e91d9f793a24d3096522be35d4a35a52025-01-12T12:36:42ZengBMCRespiratory Research1465-993X2025-01-012611810.1186/s12931-025-03096-xAirway pressures generated by high flow nasal cannula in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a computational studyHossein Shamohammadi0Liam Weaver1Sina Saffaran2Roberto Tonelli3Marianna Laviola4John G. Laffey5Luigi Camporota6Timothy E. Scott7Jonathan G. Hardman8Enrico Clini9Declan G. Bates10School of Engineering, University of WarwickSchool of Engineering, University of WarwickSchool of Engineering, University of WarwickRespiratory Diseases Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University Hospital of Modena, University of Modena and Reggio EmiliaAnaesthesia and Critical Care, Injury Inflammation and Recovery Sciences, School of Medicine, University of NottinghamAnaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Galway University Hospitals, University of GalwayIntensive Care Medicine, Division of Asthma Allergy and Lung Biology, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, King’s College LondonCentre for Biomechanics and Rehabilitation Technologies, Stoke on Trent, University of StaffordshireAnaesthesia and Critical Care, Injury Inflammation and Recovery Sciences, School of Medicine, University of NottinghamRespiratory Diseases Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University Hospital of Modena, University of Modena and Reggio EmiliaSchool of Engineering, University of WarwickAbstract Introduction and objectives High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy is an increasingly popular mode of non-invasive respiratory support for the treatment of patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF). Previous experimental studies in healthy subjects have established that HFNC generates flow-dependent positive airway pressures, but no data is available on the levels of mean airway pressure (mPaw) or positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) generated by HFNC therapy in AHRF patients. We aimed to estimate the airway pressures generated by HFNC at different flow rates in patients with AHRF, whose functional lung volume may be significantly reduced compared to healthy subjects due to alveolar consolidation and/or collapse. Materials and methods We developed a high-fidelity mechanistic computational model of the cardiopulmonary system during HFNC therapy using data from healthy subjects, and then measured the mPaw and PEEP levels produced when different amounts of alveolar consolidation/collapse were incorporated into the model. Results When calibrated to represent normal lung physiology in healthy subjects, our model recapitulates the airway pressures produced by HFNC at different flow rates in healthy volunteers who were breathing normally, with their mouths closed or open. When different amounts of alveolar consolidation/collapse are implemented in the model to reflect the pathophysiology of AHRF, the mPaw and PEEP produced by HFNC at all flow rates increase as the functional lung volume decreases (up to a mPaw of 11.53 and a PEEP of 11.41 cmH2O at 60 L/min with the mouth closed when 50% of the model’s alveolar compartments are non-aerated). When the model was matched to individual patient data from a cohort of 58 patients with AHRF receiving HFNC at 60 L/min, the mean (standard deviation) of the mPaw / PEEP produced by HFNC in the models of these patients was 8.56 (1.50) / 8.92 (1.49) cmH2O with mouths closed, and 1.73 (0.31) / 1.36 (0.36) cmH2O with mouths open. Conclusions Our results suggest that the airway pressures produced by HFNC in patients with AHRF could be higher than is currently assumed based on experimental data from healthy subjects, particularly in patients whose mouths remain closed. Higher levels of PEEP could be beneficial if they lead to alveolar recruitment and improved lung compliance, but could cause alveolar overdistension if they do not, motivating the close monitoring of the effects of HFNC on lung mechanics. Further clinical studies are warranted to directly measure the airway pressures produced by HFNC in patients with different severities of AHRF.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-025-03096-xHigh flow nasal cannulaNon-invasive respiratory supportMathematical modellingComputer simulationPositive end expiratory pressure
spellingShingle Hossein Shamohammadi
Liam Weaver
Sina Saffaran
Roberto Tonelli
Marianna Laviola
John G. Laffey
Luigi Camporota
Timothy E. Scott
Jonathan G. Hardman
Enrico Clini
Declan G. Bates
Airway pressures generated by high flow nasal cannula in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a computational study
Respiratory Research
High flow nasal cannula
Non-invasive respiratory support
Mathematical modelling
Computer simulation
Positive end expiratory pressure
title Airway pressures generated by high flow nasal cannula in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a computational study
title_full Airway pressures generated by high flow nasal cannula in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a computational study
title_fullStr Airway pressures generated by high flow nasal cannula in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a computational study
title_full_unstemmed Airway pressures generated by high flow nasal cannula in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a computational study
title_short Airway pressures generated by high flow nasal cannula in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a computational study
title_sort airway pressures generated by high flow nasal cannula in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure a computational study
topic High flow nasal cannula
Non-invasive respiratory support
Mathematical modelling
Computer simulation
Positive end expiratory pressure
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-025-03096-x
work_keys_str_mv AT hosseinshamohammadi airwaypressuresgeneratedbyhighflownasalcannulainpatientswithacutehypoxemicrespiratoryfailureacomputationalstudy
AT liamweaver airwaypressuresgeneratedbyhighflownasalcannulainpatientswithacutehypoxemicrespiratoryfailureacomputationalstudy
AT sinasaffaran airwaypressuresgeneratedbyhighflownasalcannulainpatientswithacutehypoxemicrespiratoryfailureacomputationalstudy
AT robertotonelli airwaypressuresgeneratedbyhighflownasalcannulainpatientswithacutehypoxemicrespiratoryfailureacomputationalstudy
AT mariannalaviola airwaypressuresgeneratedbyhighflownasalcannulainpatientswithacutehypoxemicrespiratoryfailureacomputationalstudy
AT johnglaffey airwaypressuresgeneratedbyhighflownasalcannulainpatientswithacutehypoxemicrespiratoryfailureacomputationalstudy
AT luigicamporota airwaypressuresgeneratedbyhighflownasalcannulainpatientswithacutehypoxemicrespiratoryfailureacomputationalstudy
AT timothyescott airwaypressuresgeneratedbyhighflownasalcannulainpatientswithacutehypoxemicrespiratoryfailureacomputationalstudy
AT jonathanghardman airwaypressuresgeneratedbyhighflownasalcannulainpatientswithacutehypoxemicrespiratoryfailureacomputationalstudy
AT enricoclini airwaypressuresgeneratedbyhighflownasalcannulainpatientswithacutehypoxemicrespiratoryfailureacomputationalstudy
AT declangbates airwaypressuresgeneratedbyhighflownasalcannulainpatientswithacutehypoxemicrespiratoryfailureacomputationalstudy