Study protocol for a hybrid type 3 effectiveness-implementation trial of a team-based implementation strategy to support educators’ use of a social engagement intervention

Abstract Background Remaking Recess (RR) is a school-based evidence-based peer social engagement intervention for autistic students. RR involves direct training and coaching with educators; however, educators face several barriers to implementation at both the individual- and organizational-levels....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jill Locke, Aksheya Sridhar, Wendy Shih, Stephanie Shire, Andria B. Eisman, Emily Kim, Adora Du, Christine Espeland, Connie Kasari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-01-01
Series:Implementation Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-024-01414-3
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841544410603454464
author Jill Locke
Aksheya Sridhar
Wendy Shih
Stephanie Shire
Andria B. Eisman
Emily Kim
Adora Du
Christine Espeland
Connie Kasari
author_facet Jill Locke
Aksheya Sridhar
Wendy Shih
Stephanie Shire
Andria B. Eisman
Emily Kim
Adora Du
Christine Espeland
Connie Kasari
author_sort Jill Locke
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Remaking Recess (RR) is a school-based evidence-based peer social engagement intervention for autistic students. RR involves direct training and coaching with educators; however, educators face several barriers to implementation at both the individual- and organizational-levels. This protocol paper describes a multi-site study that will test whether an educator-level implementation strategy, coaching, with or without a school-level implementation strategy, school-based teams, will maximize educators’ use (fidelity and sustainment) of RR for autistic students and their peers who are socially-isolated, rejected, or peripheral and may need additional support during recess. Methods This study will employ a hybrid type-3 effectiveness-implementation trial. Fifty-five elementary schools will be recruited as well as 121 educators (e.g., classroom assistants, aides), 55 general and special educator teachers, and 83–138 other school personnel (e.g., administrators). Additionally, at least 118 autistic students and allistic or non-autistic classmates will be recruited as RR recipients. Participants will complete baseline assessments at the beginning of the year, and all schools will be provided RR training. Schools will be randomized to coaching with or without school-based teams. This study will measure RR fidelity (primary outcome), RR sustainment, as well as peer engagement, social network inclusion, and social skills (secondary outcomes). It is expected that coaching with school-based teams will improve both RR fidelity and social network inclusion, while coaching with and without school-based teams will result in improved peer engagement and social skills. Discussion Previous research has documented barriers to RR implementation at both the individual- (provider) and organization-level (school). Using multi-level implementation strategies such as coaching with school-based teams may address these barriers and support RR implementation in schools. Findings from this study may guide future efforts to scale up tailored implementation strategies for use in public school districts, with the ultimate goal of increasing intervention access and improving student outcomes. Trial registration Name of the Registry: clinicaltrials.gov. Trial Registration: Clinical Trials ID: NCT06559267 . Date of Registration: August 15, 2024. Prospectively registered.
format Article
id doaj-art-0de0096102f4440db782dafb4d1b3a02
institution Kabale University
issn 1748-5908
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Implementation Science
spelling doaj-art-0de0096102f4440db782dafb4d1b3a022025-01-12T12:33:49ZengBMCImplementation Science1748-59082025-01-0120111410.1186/s13012-024-01414-3Study protocol for a hybrid type 3 effectiveness-implementation trial of a team-based implementation strategy to support educators’ use of a social engagement interventionJill Locke0Aksheya Sridhar1Wendy Shih2Stephanie Shire3Andria B. Eisman4Emily Kim5Adora Du6Christine Espeland7Connie Kasari8University of WashingtonUniversity of WashingtonUniversity of CaliforniaUniversity of OregonWayne State UniversityUniversity of WashingtonUniversity of WashingtonUniversity of WashingtonUniversity of CaliforniaAbstract Background Remaking Recess (RR) is a school-based evidence-based peer social engagement intervention for autistic students. RR involves direct training and coaching with educators; however, educators face several barriers to implementation at both the individual- and organizational-levels. This protocol paper describes a multi-site study that will test whether an educator-level implementation strategy, coaching, with or without a school-level implementation strategy, school-based teams, will maximize educators’ use (fidelity and sustainment) of RR for autistic students and their peers who are socially-isolated, rejected, or peripheral and may need additional support during recess. Methods This study will employ a hybrid type-3 effectiveness-implementation trial. Fifty-five elementary schools will be recruited as well as 121 educators (e.g., classroom assistants, aides), 55 general and special educator teachers, and 83–138 other school personnel (e.g., administrators). Additionally, at least 118 autistic students and allistic or non-autistic classmates will be recruited as RR recipients. Participants will complete baseline assessments at the beginning of the year, and all schools will be provided RR training. Schools will be randomized to coaching with or without school-based teams. This study will measure RR fidelity (primary outcome), RR sustainment, as well as peer engagement, social network inclusion, and social skills (secondary outcomes). It is expected that coaching with school-based teams will improve both RR fidelity and social network inclusion, while coaching with and without school-based teams will result in improved peer engagement and social skills. Discussion Previous research has documented barriers to RR implementation at both the individual- (provider) and organization-level (school). Using multi-level implementation strategies such as coaching with school-based teams may address these barriers and support RR implementation in schools. Findings from this study may guide future efforts to scale up tailored implementation strategies for use in public school districts, with the ultimate goal of increasing intervention access and improving student outcomes. Trial registration Name of the Registry: clinicaltrials.gov. Trial Registration: Clinical Trials ID: NCT06559267 . Date of Registration: August 15, 2024. Prospectively registered.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-024-01414-3TeamSchoolsAutismImplementationRecess
spellingShingle Jill Locke
Aksheya Sridhar
Wendy Shih
Stephanie Shire
Andria B. Eisman
Emily Kim
Adora Du
Christine Espeland
Connie Kasari
Study protocol for a hybrid type 3 effectiveness-implementation trial of a team-based implementation strategy to support educators’ use of a social engagement intervention
Implementation Science
Team
Schools
Autism
Implementation
Recess
title Study protocol for a hybrid type 3 effectiveness-implementation trial of a team-based implementation strategy to support educators’ use of a social engagement intervention
title_full Study protocol for a hybrid type 3 effectiveness-implementation trial of a team-based implementation strategy to support educators’ use of a social engagement intervention
title_fullStr Study protocol for a hybrid type 3 effectiveness-implementation trial of a team-based implementation strategy to support educators’ use of a social engagement intervention
title_full_unstemmed Study protocol for a hybrid type 3 effectiveness-implementation trial of a team-based implementation strategy to support educators’ use of a social engagement intervention
title_short Study protocol for a hybrid type 3 effectiveness-implementation trial of a team-based implementation strategy to support educators’ use of a social engagement intervention
title_sort study protocol for a hybrid type 3 effectiveness implementation trial of a team based implementation strategy to support educators use of a social engagement intervention
topic Team
Schools
Autism
Implementation
Recess
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-024-01414-3
work_keys_str_mv AT jilllocke studyprotocolforahybridtype3effectivenessimplementationtrialofateambasedimplementationstrategytosupporteducatorsuseofasocialengagementintervention
AT aksheyasridhar studyprotocolforahybridtype3effectivenessimplementationtrialofateambasedimplementationstrategytosupporteducatorsuseofasocialengagementintervention
AT wendyshih studyprotocolforahybridtype3effectivenessimplementationtrialofateambasedimplementationstrategytosupporteducatorsuseofasocialengagementintervention
AT stephanieshire studyprotocolforahybridtype3effectivenessimplementationtrialofateambasedimplementationstrategytosupporteducatorsuseofasocialengagementintervention
AT andriabeisman studyprotocolforahybridtype3effectivenessimplementationtrialofateambasedimplementationstrategytosupporteducatorsuseofasocialengagementintervention
AT emilykim studyprotocolforahybridtype3effectivenessimplementationtrialofateambasedimplementationstrategytosupporteducatorsuseofasocialengagementintervention
AT adoradu studyprotocolforahybridtype3effectivenessimplementationtrialofateambasedimplementationstrategytosupporteducatorsuseofasocialengagementintervention
AT christineespeland studyprotocolforahybridtype3effectivenessimplementationtrialofateambasedimplementationstrategytosupporteducatorsuseofasocialengagementintervention
AT conniekasari studyprotocolforahybridtype3effectivenessimplementationtrialofateambasedimplementationstrategytosupporteducatorsuseofasocialengagementintervention