FORENSIC ISSUES OF CATEGORIZING CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS AS PERMANENT STRUCTURES: METHODOLOGICAL GUIDELINES FOR FORENSIC EXAMINERS
The article addresses the issue of subsuming construction projects under the category of permanent (non-permanent) structures. The authors offer detailed criteria for successful resolution of this issue, and present the appropriate course of inquiry for this line of forensic engineering investigatio...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Russian |
| Published: |
Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation, Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science
2018-03-01
|
| Series: | Теория и практика судебной экспертизы |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.tipse.ru/jour/article/view/387 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849252919969316864 |
|---|---|
| author | Andrei R. Chudievich Andrei Yu. Butyrin Dar'ya V. Khamidova |
| author_facet | Andrei R. Chudievich Andrei Yu. Butyrin Dar'ya V. Khamidova |
| author_sort | Andrei R. Chudievich |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The article addresses the issue of subsuming construction projects under the category of permanent (non-permanent) structures. The authors offer detailed criteria for successful resolution of this issue, and present the appropriate course of inquiry for this line of forensic engineering investigation. Special emphasis is placed on the resolution of complex forensic situations. The paper incorporates a systematic overview of primary and secondary indicators for identifying buildings, structures and facilities as permanent or non-permanent. Recommendations draw on extensive regulatory resources, as well as generalization, systematization and analysis of current forensic practices, and are illustrated with specific examples. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-0d36d657829d41f8bca87876e44161c8 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1819-2785 2587-7275 |
| language | Russian |
| publishDate | 2018-03-01 |
| publisher | Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation, Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Теория и практика судебной экспертизы |
| spelling | doaj-art-0d36d657829d41f8bca87876e44161c82025-08-20T03:56:29ZrusMinistry of Justice of the Russian Federation, Russian Federal Centre of Forensic ScienceТеория и практика судебной экспертизы1819-27852587-72752018-03-01131415110.30764/1819-2785-2018-13-1-41-51376FORENSIC ISSUES OF CATEGORIZING CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS AS PERMANENT STRUCTURES: METHODOLOGICAL GUIDELINES FOR FORENSIC EXAMINERSAndrei R. Chudievich0Andrei Yu. Butyrin1Dar'ya V. Khamidova2The Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian FederationThe Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation; The Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian FederationThe Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian FederationThe article addresses the issue of subsuming construction projects under the category of permanent (non-permanent) structures. The authors offer detailed criteria for successful resolution of this issue, and present the appropriate course of inquiry for this line of forensic engineering investigation. Special emphasis is placed on the resolution of complex forensic situations. The paper incorporates a systematic overview of primary and secondary indicators for identifying buildings, structures and facilities as permanent or non-permanent. Recommendations draw on extensive regulatory resources, as well as generalization, systematization and analysis of current forensic practices, and are illustrated with specific examples.https://www.tipse.ru/jour/article/view/387permanent structuretemporary structurefoundation depthprefabricated modular building elementsexpected service life of a construction projectutilitieslinear facilitiessubstructures |
| spellingShingle | Andrei R. Chudievich Andrei Yu. Butyrin Dar'ya V. Khamidova FORENSIC ISSUES OF CATEGORIZING CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS AS PERMANENT STRUCTURES: METHODOLOGICAL GUIDELINES FOR FORENSIC EXAMINERS Теория и практика судебной экспертизы permanent structure temporary structure foundation depth prefabricated modular building elements expected service life of a construction project utilities linear facilities substructures |
| title | FORENSIC ISSUES OF CATEGORIZING CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS AS PERMANENT STRUCTURES: METHODOLOGICAL GUIDELINES FOR FORENSIC EXAMINERS |
| title_full | FORENSIC ISSUES OF CATEGORIZING CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS AS PERMANENT STRUCTURES: METHODOLOGICAL GUIDELINES FOR FORENSIC EXAMINERS |
| title_fullStr | FORENSIC ISSUES OF CATEGORIZING CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS AS PERMANENT STRUCTURES: METHODOLOGICAL GUIDELINES FOR FORENSIC EXAMINERS |
| title_full_unstemmed | FORENSIC ISSUES OF CATEGORIZING CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS AS PERMANENT STRUCTURES: METHODOLOGICAL GUIDELINES FOR FORENSIC EXAMINERS |
| title_short | FORENSIC ISSUES OF CATEGORIZING CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS AS PERMANENT STRUCTURES: METHODOLOGICAL GUIDELINES FOR FORENSIC EXAMINERS |
| title_sort | forensic issues of categorizing construction projects as permanent structures methodological guidelines for forensic examiners |
| topic | permanent structure temporary structure foundation depth prefabricated modular building elements expected service life of a construction project utilities linear facilities substructures |
| url | https://www.tipse.ru/jour/article/view/387 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT andreirchudievich forensicissuesofcategorizingconstructionprojectsaspermanentstructuresmethodologicalguidelinesforforensicexaminers AT andreiyubutyrin forensicissuesofcategorizingconstructionprojectsaspermanentstructuresmethodologicalguidelinesforforensicexaminers AT daryavkhamidova forensicissuesofcategorizingconstructionprojectsaspermanentstructuresmethodologicalguidelinesforforensicexaminers |