Effects of different microfracture drilling parameters on bone quality: a finite element analysis

BackgroundMicrofracture drilling is a surgical technique that involves creating multiple perforations in areas of cartilage defects to recruit stem cells from the bone marrow, thereby promoting cartilage regeneration in the knee joint. Increasing the exposed bone marrow surface area (more holes in t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jiayi Luo, Zihao Zou, Qiang Zou, Siwei Luo, Jialin He, Chuan Ye
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2024.1515136/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841555058362155008
author Jiayi Luo
Jiayi Luo
Zihao Zou
Qiang Zou
Qiang Zou
Siwei Luo
Jialin He
Chuan Ye
Chuan Ye
author_facet Jiayi Luo
Jiayi Luo
Zihao Zou
Qiang Zou
Qiang Zou
Siwei Luo
Jialin He
Chuan Ye
Chuan Ye
author_sort Jiayi Luo
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundMicrofracture drilling is a surgical technique that involves creating multiple perforations in areas of cartilage defects to recruit stem cells from the bone marrow, thereby promoting cartilage regeneration in the knee joint. Increasing the exposed bone marrow surface area (more holes in the same area) can enhance stem cell outflow. However, when the exposed area is large, it may affect the mechanical strength of the bone at the site of the cartilage defect. The purpose of this study is to use the finite element method to analyze the effects of drilling diameter, hole spacing, and drilling depth during microfracture surgery on the stability of the bone structure at the cartilage defect site.MethodsIn this study, a normal knee joint model was selected for solid modeling, and a model of a femoral medial condyle cartilage defect was constructed. Microfracture holes with different diameters (1.0 mm, 2.0 mm, 3.0 mm), depths (10 mm, 30 mm), and spacings (1.0 mm, 2.0 mm, 3.0 mm) were created in the femoral medial condyle cartilage defect model. Using Ansys software, the knee joint’s loading conditions in the standing position were simulated, and the structural stability of the model was analyzed. The holes in areas of stress concentration were selected for more detailed mechanical analysis.ResultsThe Von Mises stresses for all the drilling parameters did not exceed the yield strength of the bone. Changes in the drilling parameters did not affect the bone structure around the holes. When smaller diameter drilling tools with closer spacing were used, the average maximum Von Mises stress and the average Von Mises stress on the holes were the lowest.ConclusionAlthough the optimal combination of drilling parameters was not determined, this study provides a mechanical reference for the effects of drilling parameters on bone quality. It demonstrates that using smaller diameter drilling tools with closer spacing in areas of the same defect size results in a greater number of holes, with a lesser impact on bone stability. This study provides a mechanical reference for microfracture drilling.
format Article
id doaj-art-0cf27f0627d84d939b0cb88c3b308e94
institution Kabale University
issn 2296-4185
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
spelling doaj-art-0cf27f0627d84d939b0cb88c3b308e942025-01-08T06:12:03ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology2296-41852025-01-011210.3389/fbioe.2024.15151361515136Effects of different microfracture drilling parameters on bone quality: a finite element analysisJiayi Luo0Jiayi Luo1Zihao Zou2Qiang Zou3Qiang Zou4Siwei Luo5Jialin He6Chuan Ye7Chuan Ye8Department of Orthopaedics, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, ChinaCenter for Tissue Engineering and Stem Cell Research, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, ChinaCenter for Tissue Engineering and Stem Cell Research, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, ChinaDepartment of Orthopaedics, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, ChinaCenter for Tissue Engineering and Stem Cell Research, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, ChinaCenter for Tissue Engineering and Stem Cell Research, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, ChinaCenter for Tissue Engineering and Stem Cell Research, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, ChinaDepartment of Orthopaedics, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, ChinaCenter for Tissue Engineering and Stem Cell Research, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, ChinaBackgroundMicrofracture drilling is a surgical technique that involves creating multiple perforations in areas of cartilage defects to recruit stem cells from the bone marrow, thereby promoting cartilage regeneration in the knee joint. Increasing the exposed bone marrow surface area (more holes in the same area) can enhance stem cell outflow. However, when the exposed area is large, it may affect the mechanical strength of the bone at the site of the cartilage defect. The purpose of this study is to use the finite element method to analyze the effects of drilling diameter, hole spacing, and drilling depth during microfracture surgery on the stability of the bone structure at the cartilage defect site.MethodsIn this study, a normal knee joint model was selected for solid modeling, and a model of a femoral medial condyle cartilage defect was constructed. Microfracture holes with different diameters (1.0 mm, 2.0 mm, 3.0 mm), depths (10 mm, 30 mm), and spacings (1.0 mm, 2.0 mm, 3.0 mm) were created in the femoral medial condyle cartilage defect model. Using Ansys software, the knee joint’s loading conditions in the standing position were simulated, and the structural stability of the model was analyzed. The holes in areas of stress concentration were selected for more detailed mechanical analysis.ResultsThe Von Mises stresses for all the drilling parameters did not exceed the yield strength of the bone. Changes in the drilling parameters did not affect the bone structure around the holes. When smaller diameter drilling tools with closer spacing were used, the average maximum Von Mises stress and the average Von Mises stress on the holes were the lowest.ConclusionAlthough the optimal combination of drilling parameters was not determined, this study provides a mechanical reference for the effects of drilling parameters on bone quality. It demonstrates that using smaller diameter drilling tools with closer spacing in areas of the same defect size results in a greater number of holes, with a lesser impact on bone stability. This study provides a mechanical reference for microfracture drilling.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2024.1515136/fullmicrofracturefinite element analysisosteoarthritis of the knee (KOA)drillingkirschner wire
spellingShingle Jiayi Luo
Jiayi Luo
Zihao Zou
Qiang Zou
Qiang Zou
Siwei Luo
Jialin He
Chuan Ye
Chuan Ye
Effects of different microfracture drilling parameters on bone quality: a finite element analysis
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
microfracture
finite element analysis
osteoarthritis of the knee (KOA)
drilling
kirschner wire
title Effects of different microfracture drilling parameters on bone quality: a finite element analysis
title_full Effects of different microfracture drilling parameters on bone quality: a finite element analysis
title_fullStr Effects of different microfracture drilling parameters on bone quality: a finite element analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effects of different microfracture drilling parameters on bone quality: a finite element analysis
title_short Effects of different microfracture drilling parameters on bone quality: a finite element analysis
title_sort effects of different microfracture drilling parameters on bone quality a finite element analysis
topic microfracture
finite element analysis
osteoarthritis of the knee (KOA)
drilling
kirschner wire
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2024.1515136/full
work_keys_str_mv AT jiayiluo effectsofdifferentmicrofracturedrillingparametersonbonequalityafiniteelementanalysis
AT jiayiluo effectsofdifferentmicrofracturedrillingparametersonbonequalityafiniteelementanalysis
AT zihaozou effectsofdifferentmicrofracturedrillingparametersonbonequalityafiniteelementanalysis
AT qiangzou effectsofdifferentmicrofracturedrillingparametersonbonequalityafiniteelementanalysis
AT qiangzou effectsofdifferentmicrofracturedrillingparametersonbonequalityafiniteelementanalysis
AT siweiluo effectsofdifferentmicrofracturedrillingparametersonbonequalityafiniteelementanalysis
AT jialinhe effectsofdifferentmicrofracturedrillingparametersonbonequalityafiniteelementanalysis
AT chuanye effectsofdifferentmicrofracturedrillingparametersonbonequalityafiniteelementanalysis
AT chuanye effectsofdifferentmicrofracturedrillingparametersonbonequalityafiniteelementanalysis