Outcome differences in acute vs. acute on chronic heart failure and cardiogenic shock
Abstract Aims Despite advances in coronary reperfusion and percutaneous mechanical circulatory support, mortality among patients presenting with cardiogenic shock (CS) remains unacceptably high. Clinical trials and risk stratification tools have largely focused on acute CS, particularly secondary to...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Tara L. Jones, Michael C. Tan, Vidang Nguyen, Kathleen E. Kearney, Charles C. Maynard, Emily Anderson, Claudius Mahr, James M. McCabe |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2020-06-01
|
Series: | ESC Heart Failure |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12670 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Clinical outcomes following shock team implementation for cardiogenic shock: a systematic review
by: Mohamed Abdelnabi, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01) -
Can a mechanical circulatory support comprehensive approach to cardiogenic shock at referral centers reduce 30-day mortality?
by: Marina Pieri, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Sepsis-induced cardiogenic shock: controversies and evidence gaps in diagnosis and management
by: Ryota Sato, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Circulatory shock in adults in emergency department
by: Ashok Kumar Pannu
Published: (2023-07-01) -
Timing of mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis
by: Tanawat Attachaipanich, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01)