Analysis of Physical Activity Using Wearable Health Technology in US Adults Enrolled in the All of Us Research Program: Multiyear Observational Study

BackgroundTo date, no studies have examined adherence to the 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (PAGA) in real-world longitudinal settings using objectively measured activity monitoring data. This study addresses this gap by using commercial activity monitoring (...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rujul Singh, Macy K Tetrick, James L Fisher, Peter Washington, Jane Yu, Electra D Paskett, Frank J Penedo, Steven K Clinton, Roberto M Benzo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2024-12-01
Series:Journal of Medical Internet Research
Online Access:https://www.jmir.org/2024/1/e65095
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846128731654979584
author Rujul Singh
Macy K Tetrick
James L Fisher
Peter Washington
Jane Yu
Electra D Paskett
Frank J Penedo
Steven K Clinton
Roberto M Benzo
author_facet Rujul Singh
Macy K Tetrick
James L Fisher
Peter Washington
Jane Yu
Electra D Paskett
Frank J Penedo
Steven K Clinton
Roberto M Benzo
author_sort Rujul Singh
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundTo date, no studies have examined adherence to the 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (PAGA) in real-world longitudinal settings using objectively measured activity monitoring data. This study addresses this gap by using commercial activity monitoring (Fitbit) data from the All of Us dataset. ObjectiveThe primary objectives were to describe the prevalence of adherence to the 2018 PAGA and identify associated sociodemographic determinants. Additionally, we compared 3 distinct methods of processing physical activity (PA) data to estimate adherence to the 2008 PAGA. MethodsWe used the National Institutes of Health’s All of Us dataset, which contains minute-level Fitbit data for 13,947 US adults over a 7-year time span (2015-2022), to estimate adherence to PAGA. A published step-based method was used to estimate metabolic equivalents and assess adherence to the 2018 PAGA (ie, ≥150 minutes of moderate- to vigorous-intensity PA per week). We compared the step-based method, the heart rate–based method, and the proprietary Fitbit-developed algorithm to estimate adherence to the 2008 PAGA. ResultsThe average overall adherence to the 2018 PAGA was 21.6% (3006/13,947; SE 0.4%). Factors associated with lower adherence in multivariate logistic regression analysis included female sex (relative to male sex; adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.66, 95% CI 0.60-0.72; P<.001); BMI of 25.0-29.9 kg/m2 (AOR 0.53, 95% CI 0.46-0.60; P<.001), 30-34.9 kg/m2 (AOR 0.30, 95% CI 0.25-0.36; P<.001), or ≥35 kg/m2 (AOR 0.13, 95% CI 0.10-0.16; P<.001; relative to a BMI of 18.5-24.9 kg/m2); being aged 30-39 years (AOR 0.66, 95% CI 0.56-0.77; P<.001), 40-49 years (AOR 0.79, 95% CI 0.68-0.93; P=.005), or ≥70 years (AOR 0.74, 95% CI 0.62-0.87; P<.001; relative to being 18-29 years); and non-Hispanic Black race or ethnicity (AOR 0.63, 95% CI 0.50-0.79; P<.001; relative to non-Hispanic White race or ethnicity). The Fitbit algorithm estimated that a larger percentage of the sample (10,307/13,947, 73.9%; 95% CI 71.2-76.6) adhered to the 2008 PAGA compared to the heart rate method estimate (4740/13,947, 34%; 95% CI 32.8-35.2) and the step-based method (1401/13,947, 10%; 95% CI 9.4-10.6). ConclusionsOur results show significant sociodemographic differences in PAGA adherence and notably different estimates of adherence depending on the algorithm used. These findings warrant the need to account for these disparities when implementing PA interventions and the need to establish an accurate and reliable method of using commercial accelerometers to examine PA, particularly as health care systems begin integrating wearable device data into patient health records.
format Article
id doaj-art-0bb1ca991e68469ea745d9da286d8a54
institution Kabale University
issn 1438-8871
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Medical Internet Research
spelling doaj-art-0bb1ca991e68469ea745d9da286d8a542024-12-10T21:46:37ZengJMIR PublicationsJournal of Medical Internet Research1438-88712024-12-0126e6509510.2196/65095Analysis of Physical Activity Using Wearable Health Technology in US Adults Enrolled in the All of Us Research Program: Multiyear Observational StudyRujul Singhhttps://orcid.org/0009-0009-8757-0658Macy K Tetrickhttps://orcid.org/0009-0004-2605-9614James L Fisherhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3211-2691Peter Washingtonhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3276-4411Jane Yuhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0527-4022Electra D Pasketthttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8247-8299Frank J Penedohttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2780-0417Steven K Clintonhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2840-5865Roberto M Benzohttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8634-6472 BackgroundTo date, no studies have examined adherence to the 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (PAGA) in real-world longitudinal settings using objectively measured activity monitoring data. This study addresses this gap by using commercial activity monitoring (Fitbit) data from the All of Us dataset. ObjectiveThe primary objectives were to describe the prevalence of adherence to the 2018 PAGA and identify associated sociodemographic determinants. Additionally, we compared 3 distinct methods of processing physical activity (PA) data to estimate adherence to the 2008 PAGA. MethodsWe used the National Institutes of Health’s All of Us dataset, which contains minute-level Fitbit data for 13,947 US adults over a 7-year time span (2015-2022), to estimate adherence to PAGA. A published step-based method was used to estimate metabolic equivalents and assess adherence to the 2018 PAGA (ie, ≥150 minutes of moderate- to vigorous-intensity PA per week). We compared the step-based method, the heart rate–based method, and the proprietary Fitbit-developed algorithm to estimate adherence to the 2008 PAGA. ResultsThe average overall adherence to the 2018 PAGA was 21.6% (3006/13,947; SE 0.4%). Factors associated with lower adherence in multivariate logistic regression analysis included female sex (relative to male sex; adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.66, 95% CI 0.60-0.72; P<.001); BMI of 25.0-29.9 kg/m2 (AOR 0.53, 95% CI 0.46-0.60; P<.001), 30-34.9 kg/m2 (AOR 0.30, 95% CI 0.25-0.36; P<.001), or ≥35 kg/m2 (AOR 0.13, 95% CI 0.10-0.16; P<.001; relative to a BMI of 18.5-24.9 kg/m2); being aged 30-39 years (AOR 0.66, 95% CI 0.56-0.77; P<.001), 40-49 years (AOR 0.79, 95% CI 0.68-0.93; P=.005), or ≥70 years (AOR 0.74, 95% CI 0.62-0.87; P<.001; relative to being 18-29 years); and non-Hispanic Black race or ethnicity (AOR 0.63, 95% CI 0.50-0.79; P<.001; relative to non-Hispanic White race or ethnicity). The Fitbit algorithm estimated that a larger percentage of the sample (10,307/13,947, 73.9%; 95% CI 71.2-76.6) adhered to the 2008 PAGA compared to the heart rate method estimate (4740/13,947, 34%; 95% CI 32.8-35.2) and the step-based method (1401/13,947, 10%; 95% CI 9.4-10.6). ConclusionsOur results show significant sociodemographic differences in PAGA adherence and notably different estimates of adherence depending on the algorithm used. These findings warrant the need to account for these disparities when implementing PA interventions and the need to establish an accurate and reliable method of using commercial accelerometers to examine PA, particularly as health care systems begin integrating wearable device data into patient health records.https://www.jmir.org/2024/1/e65095
spellingShingle Rujul Singh
Macy K Tetrick
James L Fisher
Peter Washington
Jane Yu
Electra D Paskett
Frank J Penedo
Steven K Clinton
Roberto M Benzo
Analysis of Physical Activity Using Wearable Health Technology in US Adults Enrolled in the All of Us Research Program: Multiyear Observational Study
Journal of Medical Internet Research
title Analysis of Physical Activity Using Wearable Health Technology in US Adults Enrolled in the All of Us Research Program: Multiyear Observational Study
title_full Analysis of Physical Activity Using Wearable Health Technology in US Adults Enrolled in the All of Us Research Program: Multiyear Observational Study
title_fullStr Analysis of Physical Activity Using Wearable Health Technology in US Adults Enrolled in the All of Us Research Program: Multiyear Observational Study
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Physical Activity Using Wearable Health Technology in US Adults Enrolled in the All of Us Research Program: Multiyear Observational Study
title_short Analysis of Physical Activity Using Wearable Health Technology in US Adults Enrolled in the All of Us Research Program: Multiyear Observational Study
title_sort analysis of physical activity using wearable health technology in us adults enrolled in the all of us research program multiyear observational study
url https://www.jmir.org/2024/1/e65095
work_keys_str_mv AT rujulsingh analysisofphysicalactivityusingwearablehealthtechnologyinusadultsenrolledintheallofusresearchprogrammultiyearobservationalstudy
AT macyktetrick analysisofphysicalactivityusingwearablehealthtechnologyinusadultsenrolledintheallofusresearchprogrammultiyearobservationalstudy
AT jameslfisher analysisofphysicalactivityusingwearablehealthtechnologyinusadultsenrolledintheallofusresearchprogrammultiyearobservationalstudy
AT peterwashington analysisofphysicalactivityusingwearablehealthtechnologyinusadultsenrolledintheallofusresearchprogrammultiyearobservationalstudy
AT janeyu analysisofphysicalactivityusingwearablehealthtechnologyinusadultsenrolledintheallofusresearchprogrammultiyearobservationalstudy
AT electradpaskett analysisofphysicalactivityusingwearablehealthtechnologyinusadultsenrolledintheallofusresearchprogrammultiyearobservationalstudy
AT frankjpenedo analysisofphysicalactivityusingwearablehealthtechnologyinusadultsenrolledintheallofusresearchprogrammultiyearobservationalstudy
AT stevenkclinton analysisofphysicalactivityusingwearablehealthtechnologyinusadultsenrolledintheallofusresearchprogrammultiyearobservationalstudy
AT robertombenzo analysisofphysicalactivityusingwearablehealthtechnologyinusadultsenrolledintheallofusresearchprogrammultiyearobservationalstudy