Unmanned aerial sprayers: evaluating platform configurations and flight patterns for effective chemical applications in modern vineyards
Unmanned Aerial Sprayers (UASs) are being sought after as a possible alternative to knapsack sprayers in topographically challenging vineyards. However, prior work has identified that UASs have issues with delivering adequate spray mix to the bottom canopy zones. This study was thus conducted to und...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2025-08-01
|
| Series: | Smart Agricultural Technology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772375525002667 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849326104425267200 |
|---|---|
| author | M. Jacob Schrader Dattatray G. Bhalekar Ramesh K. Sahni Lav R. Khot |
| author_facet | M. Jacob Schrader Dattatray G. Bhalekar Ramesh K. Sahni Lav R. Khot |
| author_sort | M. Jacob Schrader |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Unmanned Aerial Sprayers (UASs) are being sought after as a possible alternative to knapsack sprayers in topographically challenging vineyards. However, prior work has identified that UASs have issues with delivering adequate spray mix to the bottom canopy zones. This study was thus conducted to understand and potentially improve spray delivery to the grapevine bottom canopy zones through two flight patterns (cross-row and row-aligned) and three commercial UASs platform configurations (AGRAS T20, AGRAS T30, and AGRAS T30 ‘orchard configuration’, DJI Technology Co.). Three flights were conducted for each treatment at an application rate of 109 L ha-1 (11.47 GPA) over independent replicate test blocks. All tests were conducted in a vertical shoot position (VSP) trained vineyard (cv. Chardonnay). Water sensitive papers and mylar cards were used to quantify coverage (%) and deposition (ng cm-2), respectively. Overall, cross-row flight applications (coverage: 6.70 ± 1.38 % [mean ± standard error], deposition: 104.54 ± 17.71 ng cm-2) failed to provide significantly different (p > 0.05) spray delivery as compared to the row-aligned operations (coverage: 10.10 ± 2.14 %, deposition: 83.81 ± 11.17 ng cm-2). Similarly, coverage and deposition data collected for the three UAS geometries failed to present significant differences (p > 0.05). Regardless of configuration or flight pattern, the bottom canopy zone received significantly lower deposition than the top canopy zone across treatments. Further engineering towards optimization of UAS geometry is needed for efficient chemical application in modern VSP trained vineyards. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-0b7fe3de8e8b43e19c70db501fb27614 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2772-3755 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-08-01 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Smart Agricultural Technology |
| spelling | doaj-art-0b7fe3de8e8b43e19c70db501fb276142025-08-20T03:48:14ZengElsevierSmart Agricultural Technology2772-37552025-08-011110103310.1016/j.atech.2025.101033Unmanned aerial sprayers: evaluating platform configurations and flight patterns for effective chemical applications in modern vineyardsM. Jacob Schrader0Dattatray G. Bhalekar1Ramesh K. Sahni2Lav R. Khot3USDA-ARS, Horticultural Crops Production and Genetic Improvement Research Unit Worksite, Prosser, WA, USA; Center for Precision and Automated Agricultural Systems, Department of Biological Systems Engineering, Washington State University, Prosser, WA, USA; Corresponding authors.Center for Precision and Automated Agricultural Systems, Department of Biological Systems Engineering, Washington State University, Prosser, WA, USACenter for Precision and Automated Agricultural Systems, Department of Biological Systems Engineering, Washington State University, Prosser, WA, USA; Agricultural Mechanization Division, ICAR-Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Bhopal, MP, IndiaCenter for Precision and Automated Agricultural Systems, Department of Biological Systems Engineering, Washington State University, Prosser, WA, USA; Corresponding authors.Unmanned Aerial Sprayers (UASs) are being sought after as a possible alternative to knapsack sprayers in topographically challenging vineyards. However, prior work has identified that UASs have issues with delivering adequate spray mix to the bottom canopy zones. This study was thus conducted to understand and potentially improve spray delivery to the grapevine bottom canopy zones through two flight patterns (cross-row and row-aligned) and three commercial UASs platform configurations (AGRAS T20, AGRAS T30, and AGRAS T30 ‘orchard configuration’, DJI Technology Co.). Three flights were conducted for each treatment at an application rate of 109 L ha-1 (11.47 GPA) over independent replicate test blocks. All tests were conducted in a vertical shoot position (VSP) trained vineyard (cv. Chardonnay). Water sensitive papers and mylar cards were used to quantify coverage (%) and deposition (ng cm-2), respectively. Overall, cross-row flight applications (coverage: 6.70 ± 1.38 % [mean ± standard error], deposition: 104.54 ± 17.71 ng cm-2) failed to provide significantly different (p > 0.05) spray delivery as compared to the row-aligned operations (coverage: 10.10 ± 2.14 %, deposition: 83.81 ± 11.17 ng cm-2). Similarly, coverage and deposition data collected for the three UAS geometries failed to present significant differences (p > 0.05). Regardless of configuration or flight pattern, the bottom canopy zone received significantly lower deposition than the top canopy zone across treatments. Further engineering towards optimization of UAS geometry is needed for efficient chemical application in modern VSP trained vineyards.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772375525002667Unmanned aerial sprayersAngled sprayingCross-row sprayingRow-aligned sprayingSpray efficacy |
| spellingShingle | M. Jacob Schrader Dattatray G. Bhalekar Ramesh K. Sahni Lav R. Khot Unmanned aerial sprayers: evaluating platform configurations and flight patterns for effective chemical applications in modern vineyards Smart Agricultural Technology Unmanned aerial sprayers Angled spraying Cross-row spraying Row-aligned spraying Spray efficacy |
| title | Unmanned aerial sprayers: evaluating platform configurations and flight patterns for effective chemical applications in modern vineyards |
| title_full | Unmanned aerial sprayers: evaluating platform configurations and flight patterns for effective chemical applications in modern vineyards |
| title_fullStr | Unmanned aerial sprayers: evaluating platform configurations and flight patterns for effective chemical applications in modern vineyards |
| title_full_unstemmed | Unmanned aerial sprayers: evaluating platform configurations and flight patterns for effective chemical applications in modern vineyards |
| title_short | Unmanned aerial sprayers: evaluating platform configurations and flight patterns for effective chemical applications in modern vineyards |
| title_sort | unmanned aerial sprayers evaluating platform configurations and flight patterns for effective chemical applications in modern vineyards |
| topic | Unmanned aerial sprayers Angled spraying Cross-row spraying Row-aligned spraying Spray efficacy |
| url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772375525002667 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mjacobschrader unmannedaerialsprayersevaluatingplatformconfigurationsandflightpatternsforeffectivechemicalapplicationsinmodernvineyards AT dattatraygbhalekar unmannedaerialsprayersevaluatingplatformconfigurationsandflightpatternsforeffectivechemicalapplicationsinmodernvineyards AT rameshksahni unmannedaerialsprayersevaluatingplatformconfigurationsandflightpatternsforeffectivechemicalapplicationsinmodernvineyards AT lavrkhot unmannedaerialsprayersevaluatingplatformconfigurationsandflightpatternsforeffectivechemicalapplicationsinmodernvineyards |