Study on the use of intravascular ultrasound-guided coronary intravascular lithotripsy compared with rotational atherectomy: a single-center, retrospective study

Objective This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided coronary intravascular lithotripsy and rotational atherectomy in treating severe coronary artery calcification. Methods A retrospective analysis of 60 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ben Li, Jiaxing Li, Guangxin Hu, Shichang Zhang, Yongkang Ren, Mingyang Li, Yinping Li, Shaobin Jia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2024-12-01
Series:Journal of International Medical Research
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605241305369
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849219981105954816
author Ben Li
Jiaxing Li
Guangxin Hu
Shichang Zhang
Yongkang Ren
Mingyang Li
Yinping Li
Shaobin Jia
author_facet Ben Li
Jiaxing Li
Guangxin Hu
Shichang Zhang
Yongkang Ren
Mingyang Li
Yinping Li
Shaobin Jia
author_sort Ben Li
collection DOAJ
description Objective This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided coronary intravascular lithotripsy and rotational atherectomy in treating severe coronary artery calcification. Methods A retrospective analysis of 60 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention at the General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University from October 2022 to August 2023 was conducted. The patients were divided into two groups: 30 received IVUS-guided coronary intravascular lithotripsy and 30 underwent IVUS-guided rotational atherectomy. The primary endpoints comprised angiographic thrombolysis in myocardial infarction III flow and <30% stenosis post-percutaneous coronary intervention, and IVUS metrics, such as >80% stent expansion, avoiding high plaque burden or lipid-rich plaques, minimizing malapposition <0.4 mm/1 mm, and preventing tissue prolapse and dissection. Safety was assessed by complications and 1- and 6-month postoperative major adverse cardiovascular event rates. Results The primary endpoint was achieved in both groups. The treatment efficacy was 100% in all cases. At 1 and 6 months post-procedure, there was no significant difference in major adverse cardiovascular events, acute myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis between the two groups. Conclusion IVUS-guided coronary intravascular lithotripsy is a safe and effective alternative to rotational atherectomy, potentially reducing certain complications.
format Article
id doaj-art-0ad58ee28d424324b55ff7f747abfa4c
institution Kabale University
issn 1473-2300
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Journal of International Medical Research
spelling doaj-art-0ad58ee28d424324b55ff7f747abfa4c2024-12-25T00:03:19ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of International Medical Research1473-23002024-12-015210.1177/03000605241305369Study on the use of intravascular ultrasound-guided coronary intravascular lithotripsy compared with rotational atherectomy: a single-center, retrospective studyBen LiJiaxing LiGuangxin HuShichang ZhangYongkang RenMingyang LiYinping LiShaobin JiaObjective This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided coronary intravascular lithotripsy and rotational atherectomy in treating severe coronary artery calcification. Methods A retrospective analysis of 60 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention at the General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University from October 2022 to August 2023 was conducted. The patients were divided into two groups: 30 received IVUS-guided coronary intravascular lithotripsy and 30 underwent IVUS-guided rotational atherectomy. The primary endpoints comprised angiographic thrombolysis in myocardial infarction III flow and <30% stenosis post-percutaneous coronary intervention, and IVUS metrics, such as >80% stent expansion, avoiding high plaque burden or lipid-rich plaques, minimizing malapposition <0.4 mm/1 mm, and preventing tissue prolapse and dissection. Safety was assessed by complications and 1- and 6-month postoperative major adverse cardiovascular event rates. Results The primary endpoint was achieved in both groups. The treatment efficacy was 100% in all cases. At 1 and 6 months post-procedure, there was no significant difference in major adverse cardiovascular events, acute myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis between the two groups. Conclusion IVUS-guided coronary intravascular lithotripsy is a safe and effective alternative to rotational atherectomy, potentially reducing certain complications.https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605241305369
spellingShingle Ben Li
Jiaxing Li
Guangxin Hu
Shichang Zhang
Yongkang Ren
Mingyang Li
Yinping Li
Shaobin Jia
Study on the use of intravascular ultrasound-guided coronary intravascular lithotripsy compared with rotational atherectomy: a single-center, retrospective study
Journal of International Medical Research
title Study on the use of intravascular ultrasound-guided coronary intravascular lithotripsy compared with rotational atherectomy: a single-center, retrospective study
title_full Study on the use of intravascular ultrasound-guided coronary intravascular lithotripsy compared with rotational atherectomy: a single-center, retrospective study
title_fullStr Study on the use of intravascular ultrasound-guided coronary intravascular lithotripsy compared with rotational atherectomy: a single-center, retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Study on the use of intravascular ultrasound-guided coronary intravascular lithotripsy compared with rotational atherectomy: a single-center, retrospective study
title_short Study on the use of intravascular ultrasound-guided coronary intravascular lithotripsy compared with rotational atherectomy: a single-center, retrospective study
title_sort study on the use of intravascular ultrasound guided coronary intravascular lithotripsy compared with rotational atherectomy a single center retrospective study
url https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605241305369
work_keys_str_mv AT benli studyontheuseofintravascularultrasoundguidedcoronaryintravascularlithotripsycomparedwithrotationalatherectomyasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT jiaxingli studyontheuseofintravascularultrasoundguidedcoronaryintravascularlithotripsycomparedwithrotationalatherectomyasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT guangxinhu studyontheuseofintravascularultrasoundguidedcoronaryintravascularlithotripsycomparedwithrotationalatherectomyasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT shichangzhang studyontheuseofintravascularultrasoundguidedcoronaryintravascularlithotripsycomparedwithrotationalatherectomyasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT yongkangren studyontheuseofintravascularultrasoundguidedcoronaryintravascularlithotripsycomparedwithrotationalatherectomyasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT mingyangli studyontheuseofintravascularultrasoundguidedcoronaryintravascularlithotripsycomparedwithrotationalatherectomyasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT yinpingli studyontheuseofintravascularultrasoundguidedcoronaryintravascularlithotripsycomparedwithrotationalatherectomyasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT shaobinjia studyontheuseofintravascularultrasoundguidedcoronaryintravascularlithotripsycomparedwithrotationalatherectomyasinglecenterretrospectivestudy