Reflexiók a jogegységi panasz kezdeti működésére, különös tekintettel az első indokolatlan eltérést megállapító jogegységi panasz határozatra (Reflections on the early wokrings of the uniformity complaint procedure with special attention given to the first decision determining unjust deviation)
A considerable change happened in the role of the Curia as the highest court responsible for uniformity of the application of law. With the restricted precedent system coming into effect in 2020. now the uniformity of the application of law is primarily ensured by the binding power of the Curia’s de...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Hungarian |
| Published: |
Universitas-Győr Nonprofit Ltd.
2023-07-01
|
| Series: | KözigazgatásTudomány |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://kozigtudomany.hu/index.php/kozigtud/article/view/45/81 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1846102469414748160 |
|---|---|
| author | Ferenc Csibor |
| author_facet | Ferenc Csibor |
| author_sort | Ferenc Csibor |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | A considerable change happened in the role of the Curia as the highest court responsible for uniformity of the application of law. With the restricted precedent system coming into effect in 2020. now the uniformity of the application of law is primarily ensured by the binding power of the Curia’s decisions that have been published in the Collection of Court Decisions. Another important part of the system is the uniformity complaint procedure. A uniformity complaint can be submitted against the Curia’s decision that cannot be further opposed with revision process, if the decision contains a deviation from one of the Curia’s published decisions. If the deviation was unjustified the Uniformity Complaint Council will annul the decision, order the Curia to a new process, and will declare the binding interpretation of law, therefore strenghtening the unity of law. The goal of this study is to closely examine the first case when the Uniformity Complaint Council found unjust deviation. The examination covers the facts of the case serving as a basis for the complaint, and also the question of law that was the focus of the process, which is whether a preliminary ruling of the European Court of Justice can serve as a basis for retrial. While examining the question of law additional attention is given to the main tenets of the relevant EU literature about the institution of preliminary decision making, and the Hungarian legal procedure literature focusing on the topic of retrial. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-0663f19d77e84c32bfc44bcaeeab7df2 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2786-1910 |
| language | Hungarian |
| publishDate | 2023-07-01 |
| publisher | Universitas-Győr Nonprofit Ltd. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | KözigazgatásTudomány |
| spelling | doaj-art-0663f19d77e84c32bfc44bcaeeab7df22024-12-27T14:57:09ZhunUniversitas-Győr Nonprofit Ltd.KözigazgatásTudomány2786-19102023-07-0131203810.54200/kt.v3i1.45Reflexiók a jogegységi panasz kezdeti működésére, különös tekintettel az első indokolatlan eltérést megállapító jogegységi panasz határozatra (Reflections on the early wokrings of the uniformity complaint procedure with special attention given to the first decision determining unjust deviation)Ferenc Csibor0https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7919-0485University of Public ServiceA considerable change happened in the role of the Curia as the highest court responsible for uniformity of the application of law. With the restricted precedent system coming into effect in 2020. now the uniformity of the application of law is primarily ensured by the binding power of the Curia’s decisions that have been published in the Collection of Court Decisions. Another important part of the system is the uniformity complaint procedure. A uniformity complaint can be submitted against the Curia’s decision that cannot be further opposed with revision process, if the decision contains a deviation from one of the Curia’s published decisions. If the deviation was unjustified the Uniformity Complaint Council will annul the decision, order the Curia to a new process, and will declare the binding interpretation of law, therefore strenghtening the unity of law. The goal of this study is to closely examine the first case when the Uniformity Complaint Council found unjust deviation. The examination covers the facts of the case serving as a basis for the complaint, and also the question of law that was the focus of the process, which is whether a preliminary ruling of the European Court of Justice can serve as a basis for retrial. While examining the question of law additional attention is given to the main tenets of the relevant EU literature about the institution of preliminary decision making, and the Hungarian legal procedure literature focusing on the topic of retrial.https://kozigtudomany.hu/index.php/kozigtud/article/view/45/81limited precedent systemuniformity complaint procedureretriealpreliminary rulingthe uniformity of the application of law |
| spellingShingle | Ferenc Csibor Reflexiók a jogegységi panasz kezdeti működésére, különös tekintettel az első indokolatlan eltérést megállapító jogegységi panasz határozatra (Reflections on the early wokrings of the uniformity complaint procedure with special attention given to the first decision determining unjust deviation) KözigazgatásTudomány limited precedent system uniformity complaint procedure retrieal preliminary ruling the uniformity of the application of law |
| title | Reflexiók a jogegységi panasz kezdeti működésére, különös tekintettel az első indokolatlan eltérést megállapító jogegységi panasz határozatra (Reflections on the early wokrings of the uniformity complaint procedure with special attention given to the first decision determining unjust deviation) |
| title_full | Reflexiók a jogegységi panasz kezdeti működésére, különös tekintettel az első indokolatlan eltérést megállapító jogegységi panasz határozatra (Reflections on the early wokrings of the uniformity complaint procedure with special attention given to the first decision determining unjust deviation) |
| title_fullStr | Reflexiók a jogegységi panasz kezdeti működésére, különös tekintettel az első indokolatlan eltérést megállapító jogegységi panasz határozatra (Reflections on the early wokrings of the uniformity complaint procedure with special attention given to the first decision determining unjust deviation) |
| title_full_unstemmed | Reflexiók a jogegységi panasz kezdeti működésére, különös tekintettel az első indokolatlan eltérést megállapító jogegységi panasz határozatra (Reflections on the early wokrings of the uniformity complaint procedure with special attention given to the first decision determining unjust deviation) |
| title_short | Reflexiók a jogegységi panasz kezdeti működésére, különös tekintettel az első indokolatlan eltérést megállapító jogegységi panasz határozatra (Reflections on the early wokrings of the uniformity complaint procedure with special attention given to the first decision determining unjust deviation) |
| title_sort | reflexiok a jogegysegi panasz kezdeti mukodesere kulonos tekintettel az elso indokolatlan elterest megallapito jogegysegi panasz hatarozatra reflections on the early wokrings of the uniformity complaint procedure with special attention given to the first decision determining unjust deviation |
| topic | limited precedent system uniformity complaint procedure retrieal preliminary ruling the uniformity of the application of law |
| url | https://kozigtudomany.hu/index.php/kozigtud/article/view/45/81 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ferenccsibor reflexiokajogegysegipanaszkezdetimukodeserekulonostekintettelazelsoindokolatlanelterestmegallapitojogegysegipanaszhatarozatrareflectionsontheearlywokringsoftheuniformitycomplaintprocedurewithspecialattentiongiventothefirstdecisiondeterminingunjustdeviatio |