Variation in acute myocardial infarction management by kidney function across hospitals in England: a cross-sectional study using the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP)

Objectives We hypothesised that there is substantial variation in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) treatment across English hospitals, particularly for people hospitalised for non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and with reduced kidney function. This study aimed to describe this variati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dorothea Nitsch, David Adlam, Clive Weston, Richard Grieve, John Deanfield, Mark De Belder, Patrick Bidulka, Rob Konstant-Hambling
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2025-05-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/15/5/e096991.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849321598176198656
author Dorothea Nitsch
David Adlam
Clive Weston
Richard Grieve
John Deanfield
Mark De Belder
Patrick Bidulka
Rob Konstant-Hambling
author_facet Dorothea Nitsch
David Adlam
Clive Weston
Richard Grieve
John Deanfield
Mark De Belder
Patrick Bidulka
Rob Konstant-Hambling
author_sort Dorothea Nitsch
collection DOAJ
description Objectives We hypothesised that there is substantial variation in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) treatment across English hospitals, particularly for people hospitalised for non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and with reduced kidney function. This study aimed to describe this variation at the hospital and the individual level to understand treatment variation and potential disparities in AMI management among people with reduced kidney function.Design Cross-sectional study.Setting Secondary care in England.Participants People hospitalised for AMI (ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or NSTEMI) in English hospitals and captured in the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project, 2014 to 2019. Kidney function was defined using estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) derived from the serum creatinine recorded within 24 hours of AMI admission.Outcome measure The primary outcome was recorded invasive cardiac intervention (at least one of angiography, percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft) compared with conservative management.Results We included 361 259 people with a first hospitalisation for AMI (STEMI or NSTEMI) at 209 hospitals for hospital-level analyses and 292 572 people with complete covariable data at 207 hospitals for individual-level analyses. We found substantial variation in the mean proportion of people with NSTEMI managed invasively across hospitals in England. At the individual level, using multivariable logistic regression to derive adjusted predicted probabilities to describe the association between kidney function and AMI management (invasive vs conservative management), we found that people had a lower adjusted predicted probability of being treated with invasive cardiac management with worsening eGFR range, particularly for NSTEMI cases (eGFR range 2: 76.6% (95% CI 76.3 to 76.8) vs eGFR range 5: 44.5% (95% CI 41.2 to 47.5)).Conclusions There is substantial AMI treatment variation across hospitals in England, particularly among people hospitalised for NSTEMI with reduced kidney function. Further research is needed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of NSTEMI management strategies for complex patients.
format Article
id doaj-art-04b4edc7a8b743e29325a696f45b2c3b
institution Kabale University
issn 2044-6055
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj-art-04b4edc7a8b743e29325a696f45b2c3b2025-08-20T03:49:42ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552025-05-0115510.1136/bmjopen-2024-096991Variation in acute myocardial infarction management by kidney function across hospitals in England: a cross-sectional study using the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP)Dorothea Nitsch0David Adlam1Clive Weston2Richard Grieve3John Deanfield4Mark De Belder5Patrick Bidulka6Rob Konstant-Hambling7Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London, UKDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences and NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UKGlangwili General Hospital, Carmarthen, UKDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UKNational Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research (NICOR), NHS Arden & Greater East Midlands Commissioning Support Unit, Leicester, UKNational Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research (NICOR), NHS Arden & Greater East Midlands Commissioning Support Unit, Leicester, UKNon-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London, UKNHS England, Redditch, UKObjectives We hypothesised that there is substantial variation in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) treatment across English hospitals, particularly for people hospitalised for non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and with reduced kidney function. This study aimed to describe this variation at the hospital and the individual level to understand treatment variation and potential disparities in AMI management among people with reduced kidney function.Design Cross-sectional study.Setting Secondary care in England.Participants People hospitalised for AMI (ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or NSTEMI) in English hospitals and captured in the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project, 2014 to 2019. Kidney function was defined using estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) derived from the serum creatinine recorded within 24 hours of AMI admission.Outcome measure The primary outcome was recorded invasive cardiac intervention (at least one of angiography, percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft) compared with conservative management.Results We included 361 259 people with a first hospitalisation for AMI (STEMI or NSTEMI) at 209 hospitals for hospital-level analyses and 292 572 people with complete covariable data at 207 hospitals for individual-level analyses. We found substantial variation in the mean proportion of people with NSTEMI managed invasively across hospitals in England. At the individual level, using multivariable logistic regression to derive adjusted predicted probabilities to describe the association between kidney function and AMI management (invasive vs conservative management), we found that people had a lower adjusted predicted probability of being treated with invasive cardiac management with worsening eGFR range, particularly for NSTEMI cases (eGFR range 2: 76.6% (95% CI 76.3 to 76.8) vs eGFR range 5: 44.5% (95% CI 41.2 to 47.5)).Conclusions There is substantial AMI treatment variation across hospitals in England, particularly among people hospitalised for NSTEMI with reduced kidney function. Further research is needed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of NSTEMI management strategies for complex patients.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/15/5/e096991.full
spellingShingle Dorothea Nitsch
David Adlam
Clive Weston
Richard Grieve
John Deanfield
Mark De Belder
Patrick Bidulka
Rob Konstant-Hambling
Variation in acute myocardial infarction management by kidney function across hospitals in England: a cross-sectional study using the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP)
BMJ Open
title Variation in acute myocardial infarction management by kidney function across hospitals in England: a cross-sectional study using the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP)
title_full Variation in acute myocardial infarction management by kidney function across hospitals in England: a cross-sectional study using the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP)
title_fullStr Variation in acute myocardial infarction management by kidney function across hospitals in England: a cross-sectional study using the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP)
title_full_unstemmed Variation in acute myocardial infarction management by kidney function across hospitals in England: a cross-sectional study using the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP)
title_short Variation in acute myocardial infarction management by kidney function across hospitals in England: a cross-sectional study using the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP)
title_sort variation in acute myocardial infarction management by kidney function across hospitals in england a cross sectional study using the myocardial ischaemia national audit project minap
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/15/5/e096991.full
work_keys_str_mv AT dorotheanitsch variationinacutemyocardialinfarctionmanagementbykidneyfunctionacrosshospitalsinenglandacrosssectionalstudyusingthemyocardialischaemianationalauditprojectminap
AT davidadlam variationinacutemyocardialinfarctionmanagementbykidneyfunctionacrosshospitalsinenglandacrosssectionalstudyusingthemyocardialischaemianationalauditprojectminap
AT cliveweston variationinacutemyocardialinfarctionmanagementbykidneyfunctionacrosshospitalsinenglandacrosssectionalstudyusingthemyocardialischaemianationalauditprojectminap
AT richardgrieve variationinacutemyocardialinfarctionmanagementbykidneyfunctionacrosshospitalsinenglandacrosssectionalstudyusingthemyocardialischaemianationalauditprojectminap
AT johndeanfield variationinacutemyocardialinfarctionmanagementbykidneyfunctionacrosshospitalsinenglandacrosssectionalstudyusingthemyocardialischaemianationalauditprojectminap
AT markdebelder variationinacutemyocardialinfarctionmanagementbykidneyfunctionacrosshospitalsinenglandacrosssectionalstudyusingthemyocardialischaemianationalauditprojectminap
AT patrickbidulka variationinacutemyocardialinfarctionmanagementbykidneyfunctionacrosshospitalsinenglandacrosssectionalstudyusingthemyocardialischaemianationalauditprojectminap
AT robkonstanthambling variationinacutemyocardialinfarctionmanagementbykidneyfunctionacrosshospitalsinenglandacrosssectionalstudyusingthemyocardialischaemianationalauditprojectminap