Oral health risks in adults who use electronic nicotine delivery systems and oral nicotine pouches: a critical review of the literature and qualitative synthesis of the available evidence

Abstract Background Use of combustible cigarettes (CCs) and smokeless oral tobacco products are well documented risk factors for a variety of oral diseases. However, the potential oral health risks of using recently introduced (since about 2000) non-combustible tobacco/nicotine products (NCPs: elect...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gerhard Scherer, Nikola Pluym, Max Scherer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-12-01
Series:Harm Reduction Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-024-01147-y
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841559708815589376
author Gerhard Scherer
Nikola Pluym
Max Scherer
author_facet Gerhard Scherer
Nikola Pluym
Max Scherer
author_sort Gerhard Scherer
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Use of combustible cigarettes (CCs) and smokeless oral tobacco products are well documented risk factors for a variety of oral diseases. However, the potential oral health risks of using recently introduced (since about 2000) non-combustible tobacco/nicotine products (NCPs: electronic cigarettes (ECs), heated tobacco products (HTPs) and oral nicotine pouches (ONPs), remain poorly established. Methods This review evaluates published human studies on detrimental oral health effects in people who use NCPs compared to those smoking cigarettes and those not using any tobacco/nicotine product (NU). We identified 52 studies, predominantly focusing on adults who used electronic cigarettes as an NCP. The studies exhibited significant heterogeneity regarding design, populations, endpoints and quality. Reported outcomes, based on both single and grouped endpoints were qualitatively evaluated by comparing people who use NCPs with NU and with people smoking CCs. Significant increases (indicating a worsening in oral health), significant decreases (indicating a lower level of detrimental effects) and no significant difference between groups were assigned scores of + 1, -1 and 0, respectively. Scores from studies belonging to the same single or grouped endpoints were averaged to a summary score ranging from − 1 to + 1. Results The qualitative meta-analysis revealed that comparisons of EC versus NU groups yielded mean scores of 0.29 for pre-cancerous lesions (N = 14 observations), 0.27 for inflammatory processes (N = 83), 0.43 for oral clinical parameters (N = 93) and 0.70 for shifts in the oral microbiome (N = 10). The corresponding values for the EC versus CC group comparisons amounted to -0.33 (N = 15), -0.14 (N = 76), -0.27 (N = 78) and 0.57 (N = 7). Most studies had significant limitations regarding group sizes, duration of NCP use (mostly only a few years) and validity of self-reported exclusive NCP use. Notably, the implications of dual use (EC + CC) and prior CC use were often not adequately considered. Conclusions The evaluated studies suggest that use of ECs is associated with relatively fewer detrimental oral health effects compared to smoking, yet oral health status remains poorer compared to not using any tobacco/nicotine products. These results have to be interpreted with caution due to a number of limitations and uncertainties in the underlying studies, particularly the potential biases and confounding factors inherent in cross-sectional study designs.
format Article
id doaj-art-0392ba34d7f7463fa481386feb82b5ad
institution Kabale University
issn 1477-7517
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Harm Reduction Journal
spelling doaj-art-0392ba34d7f7463fa481386feb82b5ad2025-01-05T12:12:44ZengBMCHarm Reduction Journal1477-75172024-12-0121111510.1186/s12954-024-01147-yOral health risks in adults who use electronic nicotine delivery systems and oral nicotine pouches: a critical review of the literature and qualitative synthesis of the available evidenceGerhard Scherer0Nikola Pluym1Max Scherer2ABF Analytisch-Biologisches Forschungslabor GmbHABF Analytisch-Biologisches Forschungslabor GmbHABF Analytisch-Biologisches Forschungslabor GmbHAbstract Background Use of combustible cigarettes (CCs) and smokeless oral tobacco products are well documented risk factors for a variety of oral diseases. However, the potential oral health risks of using recently introduced (since about 2000) non-combustible tobacco/nicotine products (NCPs: electronic cigarettes (ECs), heated tobacco products (HTPs) and oral nicotine pouches (ONPs), remain poorly established. Methods This review evaluates published human studies on detrimental oral health effects in people who use NCPs compared to those smoking cigarettes and those not using any tobacco/nicotine product (NU). We identified 52 studies, predominantly focusing on adults who used electronic cigarettes as an NCP. The studies exhibited significant heterogeneity regarding design, populations, endpoints and quality. Reported outcomes, based on both single and grouped endpoints were qualitatively evaluated by comparing people who use NCPs with NU and with people smoking CCs. Significant increases (indicating a worsening in oral health), significant decreases (indicating a lower level of detrimental effects) and no significant difference between groups were assigned scores of + 1, -1 and 0, respectively. Scores from studies belonging to the same single or grouped endpoints were averaged to a summary score ranging from − 1 to + 1. Results The qualitative meta-analysis revealed that comparisons of EC versus NU groups yielded mean scores of 0.29 for pre-cancerous lesions (N = 14 observations), 0.27 for inflammatory processes (N = 83), 0.43 for oral clinical parameters (N = 93) and 0.70 for shifts in the oral microbiome (N = 10). The corresponding values for the EC versus CC group comparisons amounted to -0.33 (N = 15), -0.14 (N = 76), -0.27 (N = 78) and 0.57 (N = 7). Most studies had significant limitations regarding group sizes, duration of NCP use (mostly only a few years) and validity of self-reported exclusive NCP use. Notably, the implications of dual use (EC + CC) and prior CC use were often not adequately considered. Conclusions The evaluated studies suggest that use of ECs is associated with relatively fewer detrimental oral health effects compared to smoking, yet oral health status remains poorer compared to not using any tobacco/nicotine products. These results have to be interpreted with caution due to a number of limitations and uncertainties in the underlying studies, particularly the potential biases and confounding factors inherent in cross-sectional study designs.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-024-01147-yCombustible cigarettesElectronic cigarettesHeated tobacco productsOral nicotine pouchesOral health
spellingShingle Gerhard Scherer
Nikola Pluym
Max Scherer
Oral health risks in adults who use electronic nicotine delivery systems and oral nicotine pouches: a critical review of the literature and qualitative synthesis of the available evidence
Harm Reduction Journal
Combustible cigarettes
Electronic cigarettes
Heated tobacco products
Oral nicotine pouches
Oral health
title Oral health risks in adults who use electronic nicotine delivery systems and oral nicotine pouches: a critical review of the literature and qualitative synthesis of the available evidence
title_full Oral health risks in adults who use electronic nicotine delivery systems and oral nicotine pouches: a critical review of the literature and qualitative synthesis of the available evidence
title_fullStr Oral health risks in adults who use electronic nicotine delivery systems and oral nicotine pouches: a critical review of the literature and qualitative synthesis of the available evidence
title_full_unstemmed Oral health risks in adults who use electronic nicotine delivery systems and oral nicotine pouches: a critical review of the literature and qualitative synthesis of the available evidence
title_short Oral health risks in adults who use electronic nicotine delivery systems and oral nicotine pouches: a critical review of the literature and qualitative synthesis of the available evidence
title_sort oral health risks in adults who use electronic nicotine delivery systems and oral nicotine pouches a critical review of the literature and qualitative synthesis of the available evidence
topic Combustible cigarettes
Electronic cigarettes
Heated tobacco products
Oral nicotine pouches
Oral health
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-024-01147-y
work_keys_str_mv AT gerhardscherer oralhealthrisksinadultswhouseelectronicnicotinedeliverysystemsandoralnicotinepouchesacriticalreviewoftheliteratureandqualitativesynthesisoftheavailableevidence
AT nikolapluym oralhealthrisksinadultswhouseelectronicnicotinedeliverysystemsandoralnicotinepouchesacriticalreviewoftheliteratureandqualitativesynthesisoftheavailableevidence
AT maxscherer oralhealthrisksinadultswhouseelectronicnicotinedeliverysystemsandoralnicotinepouchesacriticalreviewoftheliteratureandqualitativesynthesisoftheavailableevidence