Theodore Metochites’ Political Views: An Echo of the Tritheism or a Harbinger of the Baroque?

In Chapters 93 to 98 of the Sententious Notes (1320s), Theodore Metochites put forward an idea that the basic social and political agents in the society, i. e. emperor, aristocracy, and the people, belonged to different natures. Such a consideration, which was also uttered in passing by Shakespeare...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dmitrii Igorevich Makarov
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Ural Federal University 2024-12-01
Series:Античная древность и средние века
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.urfu.ru/index.php/adsv/article/view/8392
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846100071409516544
author Dmitrii Igorevich Makarov
author_facet Dmitrii Igorevich Makarov
author_sort Dmitrii Igorevich Makarov
collection DOAJ
description In Chapters 93 to 98 of the Sententious Notes (1320s), Theodore Metochites put forward an idea that the basic social and political agents in the society, i. e. emperor, aristocracy, and the people, belonged to different natures. Such a consideration, which was also uttered in passing by Shakespeare in Hamlet (1599–1601), meant theologically a transposition into the political philosophy of some tenets of the heresy of Tritheism, which was known to have emerged in the sixth century AD and to have become the target of polemics lead by Leontios of Byzantium, some Fathers of the Church, and anonymous polemists. In the late-thirteenth century, some allegations of this heresy came to be rejuvenated by John XI Bekkos in his messy theological system. Evidently, Metochites reinvigorates those Latinophile statements that already in the last third of the thirteenth century had been close to his father George Metochites, who had been condemned at the Council of Blachernai in 1285 together with John Bekkos and Constantine Meliteniotes. Metochites was certain to recognize aristocracy as the entelechy of the people and its political role, in compliance with a tenet of Theodore II Laskaris’ (1254–1258) Neoplatonism, to wit, that entelechy and difference are the two principles which govern all the beings. This article also considers some partly similar ideas about the role of the people and of the aristocracy in the social structure from the Foreigner (Forestiero) by Giulio Capaccio (1560–1634), a baroque thinker from Napoli. Capaccio was closer, than Metochites, to the concept of the people’s representation in the authorities, working on a regular basis. But Capaccio was also too close to the aforementioned notions of the Mediaeval Neoplatonism. Therefore, we believe, unlike Eva de Vries – van der Velden, that Metochites’ political views should be compared not with those of Montesquieu, but with those notions and concepts which were characteristic for the representatives of the Renaissance and Early Baroque world from the fourteenth to seventeenth century. Simultaneously, the idea of maintaining social harmony, which was conceived as similar to the musical one, was proffered as early as in the first century BC in the Confucian treatise Records of Music. Consequently, this concept goes beyond the Indo-European civilizational community.
format Article
id doaj-art-03793d69d0fe4b1d93e07a3f6d0083c7
institution Kabale University
issn 0320-4472
2687-0398
language deu
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Ural Federal University
record_format Article
series Античная древность и средние века
spelling doaj-art-03793d69d0fe4b1d93e07a3f6d0083c72024-12-30T17:48:48ZdeuUral Federal UniversityАнтичная древность и средние века0320-44722687-03982024-12-0152010.15826/adsv.2024.52.0195592Theodore Metochites’ Political Views: An Echo of the Tritheism or a Harbinger of the Baroque?Dmitrii Igorevich Makarov01) Уральский федеральный университет , Екатеринбург 2) Социологический институт РАН, филиал Федерального научно- исследовательского социологического центра РАН, Санкт-ПетербургIn Chapters 93 to 98 of the Sententious Notes (1320s), Theodore Metochites put forward an idea that the basic social and political agents in the society, i. e. emperor, aristocracy, and the people, belonged to different natures. Such a consideration, which was also uttered in passing by Shakespeare in Hamlet (1599–1601), meant theologically a transposition into the political philosophy of some tenets of the heresy of Tritheism, which was known to have emerged in the sixth century AD and to have become the target of polemics lead by Leontios of Byzantium, some Fathers of the Church, and anonymous polemists. In the late-thirteenth century, some allegations of this heresy came to be rejuvenated by John XI Bekkos in his messy theological system. Evidently, Metochites reinvigorates those Latinophile statements that already in the last third of the thirteenth century had been close to his father George Metochites, who had been condemned at the Council of Blachernai in 1285 together with John Bekkos and Constantine Meliteniotes. Metochites was certain to recognize aristocracy as the entelechy of the people and its political role, in compliance with a tenet of Theodore II Laskaris’ (1254–1258) Neoplatonism, to wit, that entelechy and difference are the two principles which govern all the beings. This article also considers some partly similar ideas about the role of the people and of the aristocracy in the social structure from the Foreigner (Forestiero) by Giulio Capaccio (1560–1634), a baroque thinker from Napoli. Capaccio was closer, than Metochites, to the concept of the people’s representation in the authorities, working on a regular basis. But Capaccio was also too close to the aforementioned notions of the Mediaeval Neoplatonism. Therefore, we believe, unlike Eva de Vries – van der Velden, that Metochites’ political views should be compared not with those of Montesquieu, but with those notions and concepts which were characteristic for the representatives of the Renaissance and Early Baroque world from the fourteenth to seventeenth century. Simultaneously, the idea of maintaining social harmony, which was conceived as similar to the musical one, was proffered as early as in the first century BC in the Confucian treatise Records of Music. Consequently, this concept goes beyond the Indo-European civilizational community.https://journals.urfu.ru/index.php/adsv/article/view/8392феодор метохитджулио капаччофеодор ii ласкарьполитическая философиятритеизмвасилевсаристократияэнтелехия
spellingShingle Dmitrii Igorevich Makarov
Theodore Metochites’ Political Views: An Echo of the Tritheism or a Harbinger of the Baroque?
Античная древность и средние века
феодор метохит
джулио капаччо
феодор ii ласкарь
политическая философия
тритеизм
василевс
аристократия
энтелехия
title Theodore Metochites’ Political Views: An Echo of the Tritheism or a Harbinger of the Baroque?
title_full Theodore Metochites’ Political Views: An Echo of the Tritheism or a Harbinger of the Baroque?
title_fullStr Theodore Metochites’ Political Views: An Echo of the Tritheism or a Harbinger of the Baroque?
title_full_unstemmed Theodore Metochites’ Political Views: An Echo of the Tritheism or a Harbinger of the Baroque?
title_short Theodore Metochites’ Political Views: An Echo of the Tritheism or a Harbinger of the Baroque?
title_sort theodore metochites political views an echo of the tritheism or a harbinger of the baroque
topic феодор метохит
джулио капаччо
феодор ii ласкарь
политическая философия
тритеизм
василевс
аристократия
энтелехия
url https://journals.urfu.ru/index.php/adsv/article/view/8392
work_keys_str_mv AT dmitriiigorevichmakarov theodoremetochitespoliticalviewsanechoofthetritheismoraharbingerofthebaroque