THE DISCUSSION ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER OF MYASNIKOVSKY DISTRICT (1920s)
The article discusses the status of the city of Nakh-ichevan-on-Don. The city was founded by the Crimean Armenians in 1779, and in 1926-1928 it was the administrative center of the Armenian Myasnikovsky district. No single national district in the South of Russia had an administrative center in the...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Russian |
| Published: |
North-Caucasus Federal University
2021-09-01
|
| Series: | Гуманитарные и юридические исследования |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://humanitieslaw.ncfu.ru/jour/article/view/355 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1846120850160353280 |
|---|---|
| author | Victor Akopyan |
| author_facet | Victor Akopyan |
| author_sort | Victor Akopyan |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The article discusses the status of the city of Nakh-ichevan-on-Don. The city was founded by the Crimean Armenians in 1779, and in 1926-1928 it was the administrative center of the Armenian Myasnikovsky district. No single national district in the South of Russia had an administrative center in the city. Proclamation of Nakhichevan as the administrative center of the district enjoyed support among not only local officials and members of their families but the public at large, as they believed it conveyed deep national meaning. The leaders of the region and the district pursued a different goal. Having proclaimed Nakhichevan the center of the district, they tried to prevent the supporters of the Gadzievs clan that used to hold leading official positions in the district from regaining them. It was planned to relocate the center to Chaltyr or the Crimea as soon as Gadzievs's influence was eliminated. The author shows that in the year following the creation of Myasnikovsky district the higher management began to exert pressure on the Armenian authorities with the aim of making their own decisions about the transfer of the center of New Na-khchivan in one of large villages. In the discussion on the status of Nakhichevan as a district centre the fate of the city was under question. Without the consent of indigenous Armenian population of the Don, in 1928 the Central district of Nakhichevan was moved to the village of Crimea, and then to Chaltyr. In the same year, Nakhichevan was annexed to the city of Rostov-on-Don. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-0304830c9af04ebb9fc1b15ce0d77e93 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2409-1030 |
| language | Russian |
| publishDate | 2021-09-01 |
| publisher | North-Caucasus Federal University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Гуманитарные и юридические исследования |
| spelling | doaj-art-0304830c9af04ebb9fc1b15ce0d77e932024-12-16T07:19:34ZrusNorth-Caucasus Federal UniversityГуманитарные и юридические исследования2409-10302021-09-0102816353THE DISCUSSION ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER OF MYASNIKOVSKY DISTRICT (1920s)Victor Akopyan0Pyatigorsk State Linguistic UniversityThe article discusses the status of the city of Nakh-ichevan-on-Don. The city was founded by the Crimean Armenians in 1779, and in 1926-1928 it was the administrative center of the Armenian Myasnikovsky district. No single national district in the South of Russia had an administrative center in the city. Proclamation of Nakhichevan as the administrative center of the district enjoyed support among not only local officials and members of their families but the public at large, as they believed it conveyed deep national meaning. The leaders of the region and the district pursued a different goal. Having proclaimed Nakhichevan the center of the district, they tried to prevent the supporters of the Gadzievs clan that used to hold leading official positions in the district from regaining them. It was planned to relocate the center to Chaltyr or the Crimea as soon as Gadzievs's influence was eliminated. The author shows that in the year following the creation of Myasnikovsky district the higher management began to exert pressure on the Armenian authorities with the aim of making their own decisions about the transfer of the center of New Na-khchivan in one of large villages. In the discussion on the status of Nakhichevan as a district centre the fate of the city was under question. Without the consent of indigenous Armenian population of the Don, in 1928 the Central district of Nakhichevan was moved to the village of Crimea, and then to Chaltyr. In the same year, Nakhichevan was annexed to the city of Rostov-on-Don.https://humanitieslaw.ncfu.ru/jour/article/view/355the south of russianorth-caucasus regionnakhichevan-on-donthe don armeniansnational districtadministrative center |
| spellingShingle | Victor Akopyan THE DISCUSSION ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER OF MYASNIKOVSKY DISTRICT (1920s) Гуманитарные и юридические исследования the south of russia north-caucasus region nakhichevan-on-don the don armenians national district administrative center |
| title | THE DISCUSSION ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER OF MYASNIKOVSKY DISTRICT (1920s) |
| title_full | THE DISCUSSION ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER OF MYASNIKOVSKY DISTRICT (1920s) |
| title_fullStr | THE DISCUSSION ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER OF MYASNIKOVSKY DISTRICT (1920s) |
| title_full_unstemmed | THE DISCUSSION ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER OF MYASNIKOVSKY DISTRICT (1920s) |
| title_short | THE DISCUSSION ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER OF MYASNIKOVSKY DISTRICT (1920s) |
| title_sort | discussion on the administrative center of myasnikovsky district 1920s |
| topic | the south of russia north-caucasus region nakhichevan-on-don the don armenians national district administrative center |
| url | https://humanitieslaw.ncfu.ru/jour/article/view/355 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT victorakopyan thediscussionontheadministrativecenterofmyasnikovskydistrict1920s AT victorakopyan discussionontheadministrativecenterofmyasnikovskydistrict1920s |