Molecular dynamics study on wettability difference between lignite dust and silica dust

In this paper, the differences in the wetting mechanisms of lignite dust and silica dust were investigated using molecular dynamics simulations and quantum chemical methods. A water-surfactant-lignite coal dust/silica dust model was constructed and the interaction energy, radial distribution functio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peng YANG, Yanan WANG, Jie WANG, Hongfu JIA, Lingyun YANG, Dahe YAN, Wengang LI, Zimeng LI
Format: Article
Language:zho
Published: Editorial Office of Safety in Coal Mines 2025-01-01
Series:Meikuang Anquan
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mkaqzz.com/cn/article/doi/10.13347/j.cnki.mkaq.20230738
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841527870853218304
author Peng YANG
Yanan WANG
Jie WANG
Hongfu JIA
Lingyun YANG
Dahe YAN
Wengang LI
Zimeng LI
author_facet Peng YANG
Yanan WANG
Jie WANG
Hongfu JIA
Lingyun YANG
Dahe YAN
Wengang LI
Zimeng LI
author_sort Peng YANG
collection DOAJ
description In this paper, the differences in the wetting mechanisms of lignite dust and silica dust were investigated using molecular dynamics simulations and quantum chemical methods. A water-surfactant-lignite coal dust/silica dust model was constructed and the interaction energy, radial distribution function (RDF), mean square displacement (MSD), self-diffusion coefficient (D) and relative number density among the components within 100 ps after equilibrium were investigated by molecular dynamics simulations. The results show that the interaction energy and self-diffusion coefficient between cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide(CTAB) solution and lignite molecules are larger and the peak value of relative number density is higher compared to silica dust; by comparing the electrostatic potential of lignite dust with that of silica dust, the magnitude of the potential difference of SiO2 varies widely, which shows that the size of the potential difference between the dust surface and water molecules due to active agent adsorption is one of the factors affecting the difference in surface wettability, but the functional groups in lignite increase the intermolecular interactions and play a significant role in the wetting process.
format Article
id doaj-art-01229a539b3943bc82f564bb8089d595
institution Kabale University
issn 1003-496X
language zho
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Editorial Office of Safety in Coal Mines
record_format Article
series Meikuang Anquan
spelling doaj-art-01229a539b3943bc82f564bb8089d5952025-01-15T04:32:08ZzhoEditorial Office of Safety in Coal MinesMeikuang Anquan1003-496X2025-01-01561869210.13347/j.cnki.mkaq.20230738cMKAQ20230738Molecular dynamics study on wettability difference between lignite dust and silica dustPeng YANG0Yanan WANG1Jie WANG2Hongfu JIA3Lingyun YANG4Dahe YAN5Wengang LI6Zimeng LI7Shanxi Huajin Jining Coal Industry Co., Ltd., Linfen 042100, ChinaSchool of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, ChinaShanxi Huajin Jining Coal Industry Co., Ltd., Linfen 042100, ChinaSchool of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, ChinaSchool of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, ChinaShanxi Huajin Jining Coal Industry Co., Ltd., Linfen 042100, ChinaShanxi Huajin Jining Coal Industry Co., Ltd., Linfen 042100, ChinaSchool of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, ChinaIn this paper, the differences in the wetting mechanisms of lignite dust and silica dust were investigated using molecular dynamics simulations and quantum chemical methods. A water-surfactant-lignite coal dust/silica dust model was constructed and the interaction energy, radial distribution function (RDF), mean square displacement (MSD), self-diffusion coefficient (D) and relative number density among the components within 100 ps after equilibrium were investigated by molecular dynamics simulations. The results show that the interaction energy and self-diffusion coefficient between cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide(CTAB) solution and lignite molecules are larger and the peak value of relative number density is higher compared to silica dust; by comparing the electrostatic potential of lignite dust with that of silica dust, the magnitude of the potential difference of SiO2 varies widely, which shows that the size of the potential difference between the dust surface and water molecules due to active agent adsorption is one of the factors affecting the difference in surface wettability, but the functional groups in lignite increase the intermolecular interactions and play a significant role in the wetting process.https://www.mkaqzz.com/cn/article/doi/10.13347/j.cnki.mkaq.20230738silica dustcoal dustwettabilitymolecular dynamicsquantum chemistrydust control
spellingShingle Peng YANG
Yanan WANG
Jie WANG
Hongfu JIA
Lingyun YANG
Dahe YAN
Wengang LI
Zimeng LI
Molecular dynamics study on wettability difference between lignite dust and silica dust
Meikuang Anquan
silica dust
coal dust
wettability
molecular dynamics
quantum chemistry
dust control
title Molecular dynamics study on wettability difference between lignite dust and silica dust
title_full Molecular dynamics study on wettability difference between lignite dust and silica dust
title_fullStr Molecular dynamics study on wettability difference between lignite dust and silica dust
title_full_unstemmed Molecular dynamics study on wettability difference between lignite dust and silica dust
title_short Molecular dynamics study on wettability difference between lignite dust and silica dust
title_sort molecular dynamics study on wettability difference between lignite dust and silica dust
topic silica dust
coal dust
wettability
molecular dynamics
quantum chemistry
dust control
url https://www.mkaqzz.com/cn/article/doi/10.13347/j.cnki.mkaq.20230738
work_keys_str_mv AT pengyang moleculardynamicsstudyonwettabilitydifferencebetweenlignitedustandsilicadust
AT yananwang moleculardynamicsstudyonwettabilitydifferencebetweenlignitedustandsilicadust
AT jiewang moleculardynamicsstudyonwettabilitydifferencebetweenlignitedustandsilicadust
AT hongfujia moleculardynamicsstudyonwettabilitydifferencebetweenlignitedustandsilicadust
AT lingyunyang moleculardynamicsstudyonwettabilitydifferencebetweenlignitedustandsilicadust
AT daheyan moleculardynamicsstudyonwettabilitydifferencebetweenlignitedustandsilicadust
AT wengangli moleculardynamicsstudyonwettabilitydifferencebetweenlignitedustandsilicadust
AT zimengli moleculardynamicsstudyonwettabilitydifferencebetweenlignitedustandsilicadust